Back to transcripts

Middle Nation 100 Days Challenge: Qawwamun

Middle Nation · 12 Sep 2025 · 72:20 · YouTube

I hope it's live, InshaAllah. InshaAllah, you can hear me?

InshaAllah, verify that. It's now just waiting for the next chapter show before we begin properly. We have completed about ten days of 10 between ten to twelve days of content.

And it's getting completed. Right?

Yeah. Completed, and we just began the new theme for this week.

Ah. And what's the theme for this

week? Psychological decolonization.

Aiwa. Okay.

And it will take a few this will go on for about three weeks or so. A lot.

So for anyone who doesn't know, let's just do a recap of what this is. Yeah. The what the that we're doing something called we're calling it the middle day one hundred day challenge.

Yeah.

Because I'm I'm sort of recapping this because we've gotten a lot of new subscribers over the last, I don't know, twenty four, forty eight hours. Yes. A lot of people have come to the channel as a result of the Charlie Kirk incident

Uh-huh.

And the and the video response that I made to it. So there will be probably potentially people who will see this or who might join the live who aren't actually that familiar with the channel or with the channel's content. Mhmm. Once you come to the channel, you'll see that there's what? 12,000 sorry, 1,200 videos Mhmm.

Or so?

1,400.

1,400, sorry. A 400 videos. It's a lot to go through, obviously. And some of them are relatively long as well, so it's a lot of content to try to sort through. So Middle Nation came up with the idea to sort of pick key videos Mhmm.

On themes.

Based on certain themes. We came up with a series of themes, and then a series of videos that match those themes, or that sort of elucidate those themes. Mhmm. And then we're going through each video. Sometimes sometimes over a over a course of a few days for one video to break down the different points that are in the video.

Yes. And then Middle Nation people, Middle Nationers, if you wanna call it. Mhmm. I've never known what we should call people. People who who who follow Middle Nation and who participate with Middle Nation produce their own content on the basis of the prompts that that we give them for the themes and the specific subjects or topics that are covered in the videos.

Mhmm. So the last one that we just finished and that we're doing a live now, sort of to to to close it off Uh-huh. Is the original channel was called from the ayah in Quran about So that was the original channel. And then when I felt that I had covered that topic as much as I when I said everything that I had to say really with regards to that topic, it was it was basically in response to the red pill nonsense that was very rampant at that time, still rampant until now. I I created that our moon channel specifically for that purpose to deal with relationship issues Mhmm.

Men and women, gender issues, and so forth in the context of Islam. And it's that was never a topic that was my area. It was never something that I particularly enjoyed doing, but I felt that it was a necessary thing to do. So that was that's I think our moon is roughly 200 videos.

About 140 videos.

Okay. 240 videos.

You have all the playlist?

Yeah. The playlist is there. So when I when I changed it to over to Middle Nation where we were now discussing geopolitics and sort of social critique and so on, and and Middle Nation, the the three objectives of Middle Nation, as I want you to know by now, is economic sovereignty, political independence, and psychological decolonization of the Muslim world and the global South more broadly. When we changed it over to to to Middle Nation, and that's that's the area of my real expertise and interest, Then we just turned into a playlist.

Mhmm.

So when going through the Middle Nation challenge, we didn't overlook the original content because also the content actually deals with an aspect of psychological decolonization. Because because the red pill nonsense and all of this gender nonsense and all of this relationship confusion is symptomatic of Western thinking. It's it's it's really arising out of the West because people in the rest of the world, certainly people in the rest of the Muslim don't have these kinds of issues unless you bring them to us. Yeah. And that's why I I initiated the channel in the first place because I was seeing that you're trying to bring these you're trying to bring this confusion now to the Muslim world.

Yeah. Basically, there's one video where it wasn't covered in the challenge,

but it

was our problem their problems are not our problem.

Precisely. Their problems are not our problems. Yeah. And their solutions to their problems are not our are not our solutions.

Yeah.

They you're trying to you're trying to export to the Muslim world your solutions to your problems when we don't even have those problems to begin with, and your solutions never do anything but create more problems for you.

And yeah. And confusion

and Yeah. That's that's their that's their approach. If we solve a problem by just creating more problems, so we won't forget about the first problem. Exactly. That's their problem solving approach.

There's a brother here who I believe is a brother. Thank you, Ustad, for becoming a woman. He prepared me for marriage more than

you know.

Brother, I'm makes me

very happy. I'm very happy to hear that.

Yeah. And pretty much I I think I think you've you've you've covered the ground. It's a comprehensive

I think so. And I and I and I also like, when I was actively posting, okay, the channel wasn't big at that time at all. Mhmm. It was growing very fast. Yeah.

And if I had any sense as a social media or what do you call influencer or what have you, YouTuber, I would have just stuck with that content because it always gets fused. Yeah. Because everybody's in relationships, so once they're in relationships and and it's a it's always a trending topic. So if I had any sense Yeah. And wanted to have a really big channel, I I just would have stuck with that.

Mhmm. But I really felt like I had every I had said everything that I had to say about it. And none of the red pill advocates, none of the red pill resellers Mhmm. Were ever able to really respond intelligently to anything that I had said. They they were never able to debunk my debunking.

Mhmm. And so I felt that I had dismantled it sufficiently Yeah. And and could could rid myself of the topic. Because like I say, it was never really a favorite Yeah. Area of mine.

Because I I I honestly just feel it's all rubbish. Mhmm. All of this is rubbish.

I mean, previously, we had political independence as the theme and we sorry. We we were covering the OCJFC.

Mhmm.

And several videos, we we we had to pass through the video over a course of number or a number of days. But for the Kawamong section, the 240 videos that you will be going through are very short videos.

Yes. Yes. That was that was sort of my my thing was was most of the videos are four minute four to five minutes in length. They're, like, bite size. Mhmm.

Very quick.

Exactly.

I yeah. I don't think I had think maybe the longest that I had was maybe ten minutes

Yeah. Perhaps. Every every video that it has like a again, it's a collection of information all, you know, summarized and clearly explained in a matter of minutes, you know, four minutes average.

And and and and really that's that all that does is show you the extent to which all of these problems and all of this confusion really is nothing but nonsense. Mhmm. And it it it can be relatively easily dispensed with. Exactly. It doesn't take much.

It it only takes a few four minute video. Apparently, two hundred and forty four minute videos Yeah. To to dismiss it.

But we still have demand, you know, for more of that content.

Again, because I know. Because this is something, you know because everyone is busy in their own life Mhmm. And everyone is busy, you know, the the the things that are the priority for everyone is their own immediate sphere Yeah. Their own immediate personal sphere. And, you know, obviously a lot of the audience is American.

Mhmm. Obviously, almost the entirety of the audience is either English only or at least English speaking.

Mhmm.

So this is a big problem or a big issue, say Yeah. For people in the West, for for English speaking people and so on.

So Yeah.

You know, it's always going to be a topic.

So okay. So let's just move forward to the different the dozen or so videos that we have to go through in the Kowloon series. So again, I would like to emphasize, as Shahid has already mentioned, this was the past challenge. Today, began the new series of psychological decolonization series. So look out for these prompts and and all the the history of the prompts that we posted in the main discussion group as well as the social media brigade group, so you can

Yeah. Please them. Yeah. If you again, if you're new here Yeah. We have a Telegram discussion group, a Middle Nation discussion group, and we have several sort of associated and related groups on Telegram.

Like, have a book discussion group. We have a social media brigade brigades group. We have a regions group that has, I think, over 600 people in it Mhmm. Where you can talk to people and learn from people in different parts of the world to to to know about what's really going on in the in those different parts of the world and get a perspective from people in those different parts of the world Yes. Which I think is for for me personally, the Regents Group is the most one of the most valuable Yeah.

Things that we've created. But the social media engaged group is we have the people who are participating in the challenge Yes. Who are creating content on a variety of platforms on TikTok, on on x. Yes. And I don't know.

On YouTube as well, actually.

Yeah. YouTube.

On TikTok.

Instagram. Yeah. Yeah.

And so there, you can also get some kind of training. Yeah. Some sort of social media training. This is completely free, obviously. Yeah.

Just to, like, help you with your with your content, with what you wanna write, what what you wanna say, how you wanna say it, what you maybe should or shouldn't say, and

so forth. So for the priority, have a few priorities.

Alright.

How do I join? So first, you join the main discussion group, and then you will be directed

Yeah.

To the relevant channels that you would have to, you know, take the prompts go off of the prompts and and participate in the challenge. So basically, for step one, join the middle nation

Join middle nation discussion group. Now now let me just say for for people again who haven't joined before Mhmm. Or maybe who also aren't familiar with Telegram, there are impostors just as there are impostor accounts for me on TikTok. There are impostor accounts for me on Instagram, impostor accounts for me on X even. Mhmm.

So just make sure that it's the real thing. I participate personally in the Middle Nation discussion group and in in all of the subgroups as well. So just search Middle Nation or maybe some one of the one of the moderators can put a link.

Yeah. I'm gonna share the link. Yes. Samira has already shared

Okay. So you'll see the link there. If you go there, then you can join the actual Middle Nation discussion group.

Yeah. And So without further ado, I will now start to recap the videos that we went through. So we began with the practical principles of men, the first video.

Yeah. Kind of remember that one.

Yeah. Thirty thirty two. So basically, talking about how men have to frequently negotiate with the dunya Mhmm. Between their principles and their responsibilities, and how men have to bend until they break, dust themselves off, and then stand stand up straight again, and this time knowing how far we can bend without damage.

Correct.

Basically, you know, like balancing between your ideals and what can be realistically achieved.

Right.

You know? And I thought it was an interesting point, an interesting video to go through because we were just covering about the leaders, you know, the the the kind of choices, difficult choices that the Muslim leaders have to navigate. Mhmm. In order to chart the course, understanding the landscape, the geopolitical landscape and the difficulties that they have to grapple with in making decisions that would benefit us in the long run. You know, it was tied with the, you know, our discussion on the preteral for Deglia as well.

Mhmm.

And then, it was a good connect, I mean, was a link, you know, in in continuing the the challenge. So I thought it was a good

I think yeah. I think it's very useful because, you know, it it will help you how can I say this? I think that I think that people look at politics and look at at at, you know, state actors. And they apply different standards, different human standards, to what you apply to actual people, which is not correct because they're nothing but people and dealing with people. Politics is the business of dealing with people and dealing with with real existing circumstances just like you have to do in your personal life, just like you have to do in your own individual private life.

And so anyone on the on a on an individual level, you know this already. You already understand that as as a man, there are some things that you can and cannot do. There are some things that you obviously want to do. But in order to achieve them, you have to maybe, compromise. You have to maybe sacrifice.

You have to negotiate. You have to make some sort of trade offs, some sorts of deals, and so on. But you have to do that in your own personal life. What do you think is what do you think is like on the state level? Mhmm.

But somehow you want states, and and and and leaders of whole states who have millions of people depending upon them making wise decisions. You want them to act rashly. You want them to act recklessly for the sake of, quote, unquote, ideals Mhmm. For the sake of morals, for the sake of moral ideals. More you want them to behave moralistically when you know perfectly well that you in your own life can't do that.

Exactly.

You have to you you you know, everyone actually understands realpolitik because you all operate upon realpolitik in your own life Mhmm. In in in your own decisions as you move through the world. You have to be realistic. There's not another way to survive on this planet. You have to be realistic.

Okay. And, I will now proceed to the next video

Okay.

That we discussed, substantive

Oh, I'm sorry. Sorry. Let me let me just pause that because this is something that that is men specifically because this this video was talking about the practical principles of men. Right? Practical what?

Principles, was it?

The practical principles of men.

Practical principles of men. Yeah. Because men don't have the luxury of being idealistic. Men in this world, you don't have the luxury of operating in an idealistic manner because no one is gonna take care of you. There's no scenario If you're a man, there's no scenario where someone's gonna take care of you.

You're the one who always ends up being the one who takes care of others, whether it's your wife or whether it's your parents, your mother, your siblings, your children, and so on. You're the one who ends up having to take care of people. You're the one who ends up being held accountable. You're the one who has to fix things when they go wrong. You're the one who solves the the the problems of of the people in your family as best you can.

That is expected of you. Mhmm. Now you may or may not succeed in that, but that is expected of you in ways that it is not expected of women. Mhmm. Women are the ones who are taken care of, or it should be that way.

Women are the ones who are taken care of, and you're the one taking care. Mhmm. So this means that you don't have the luxury, and it is self indulgent for you to be overly emotional, for you to be over idealistic, for you to be utopian, for you to be any of in any of these very any of it's for you to have any of these qualities that you can only safely have when you have no responsibilities. If you have responsibilities, it's a must that you're a realistic person, and you're able to make compromises, and you're able to do trade offs, and you're able to bend until you break. And then, as you said, learn from that experience how far you can bend without breaking.

I mean, it's a it's a it's a load, you know. I I don't know how anyone would imagine that they could take the take that position, much less think, you know, of what they would do in their shoes, you know.

But this is the thing also about this is one of the things that really irritated me about the the whole red pill movement and still does, except that I don't see much of it anymore. We don't have a problem with this being the case. We take pride in this. As men, we take pride in this. We take pride in our ability to take care of.

We take pride in our ability to be responsible for, to be the one who solves problems, to who bears the burdens. We take pride in that. Whereas the the red pill movement They're complains about it. Yeah. Complains about it and acts like it's unfair and so forth.

You actually have a problem with being a man. Mhmm. You actually have a problem with the burden of masculinity because it's a burden to you, not something that you're proud of. Mhmm. Rather than being proud of the fact that you're the one who can bear the burden.

Yep. This the you're you're actually trying to inculcate in men weakness. And feminine qualities, and no offense to women, but the feminine qualities of not you know, wanting to share the responsibilities and so forth rather than taking pride in the in the fact that you're able to take responsibility and to take care of people Mhmm. And the the people over whom you are. You have authority and responsibility.

Mhmm. Which now okay. It's a very good tie up to the following video. On day 33, substantive masculinity, the quality of selflessness. You know?

So, again, we talked about how Allah has chosen men only as his most accountable and responsible slave, and the the necessary qualities to succeed in his in this role is basically selfless selflessness. And this is the essence of masculinity, the essence of chivalry, and at the heart of man's nature. We need to advance the discussion of masculinity to talk about real substance and not superficial issues of manhood away from confused, immature, western, non Muslim concepts and revive stoic and selfless character taught in Islam and embodied in the prophets.

Yeah. Absolutely.

Basically, you know, this it's just a continuation

of Yeah. Yeah. This is I mean, yeah. Exactly. This is this is this is also, you know, the the the the whole red pill movement and the, you know, men's rights

Yeah.

Advocacy and and whatnot is like in the infantilization. Yeah. The infantilization of men. Why are you supposed to care about the material things and the and you know what I mean? Like, it like, they're they're always these are the types.

Right? With the with their sunglasses and and their expensive clothes and their fancy cars and their yachts and their mansions and how to become a millionaire and the high value man and all of Yes. This and and all of this very very western superficial, you know

Markers.

Hoarding Mhmm. Mentality. Mhmm. This is all weakness. Mhmm.

This is very weak. This is this is not masculinity. This is not historical or traditional masculinity. It certainly isn't masculinity in Islam. Yeah.

As I say, you take pride in the one who provides. Yes. That's not what I'm I'm not here for the stuff. Yeah. I get the stuff so that I can give it

to you. Exactly.

And and and and I get the honor and the pleasure out of being able to be the one to do that. Mhmm. And now you're complaining about not being able to have the stuff for yourself. Well, is this is a I'm sorry. This is a womanly quality.

This is a womanly quality.

It's very petty.

Now you want the satin pillows? You know? What is this?

Okay. Somebody's asking, spanky two one four two x. Could you know they should simplify some ideas for kids? It would help parents explain world events through an Islamic lens as a counter to what our children learn in the media.

That's a very interesting idea.

Yeah. We will we will consider it, and and obviously we've we've been talking it.

We have been talking about it, and I think that there is one sister in Middle Nation Yeah. Who is who has already prepared some, but this is based on Kabomun, I think. Is I it

believe she has a a number of, geopolitical

Okay. Okay. She's putting together a kind of a curriculum, I think, just for her own kids. Yeah. But that might be useful for for others.

So we'll see about developing something

like that. Yeah. She she was quite generous in sharing Yeah.

She was. She she shared it.

So once again, SPENCY2142X, if you're not in the middle nation discussion group, please join the discussion group, and we will direct you accordingly. Shahid is present on most days in the discussion group, and he actively participates in it. And there have been some questions also in between Okay. About current affairs

Alright.

That I would like to highlight because again, if you join the channel, the discussion group, and if you go through the chat history, you will find that Shaheen has talked about some of the questions that have been placed here.

Yeah. And also I'll I'll just say also, when you join the when you when you join the discussion group, you can you can it's public for reading. Mhmm. If you want to speak, then you have to join Yeah. I believe.

Yeah. And what I would advise is that you come and observe for some period of time Mhmm. Before you join in order to speak. Mhmm. Because for one thing, we're it's it's quite a disciplined and orderly discussion.

It's not like a a free for all. Mhmm. This isn't, you know, some Reddit or or or, you know, like I say, a free for all type of a forum. Mhmm. Just the same way that we do the lives on x if you've participated or or been an audience on on the x spaces that we do.

Mhmm. We're ex we try to be very disciplined. We try to be very organized. We try to be very orderly. And it's not like, for example, it's not it's not just open.

Yeah. It's the middle nation discussion. We talk about issues that are relevant to middle nation that are usually featured in the videos. There is, you know, a free flowing discussion on a number of topics. However, if you if you if you say how can I say this?

There's there's a standard. I'll just say it like that. You know, one of the things that I always talk about is the fact that we need to erect partitions around discourse, and there there needs to be really an entry requirement, an entry level standard of being able to discern whether or not you're going to be able to participate fruitfully for yourself and for the rest of the people in the disc discussion.

Yes.

Whether you can benefit and whether we can benefit from you being with us.

Yes.

So come and and observe the chat and see how it works

Yeah.

And see how, you know There's rules, Yanni.

Yeah. Follow along with the I mean, again, we invite you to join the group to and and for any of your queries, your your questions, you may refer to the chat history.

Yeah. Most of the things there are so many so many so many issues that are, you know, frequent frequently come

up. Mhmm.

And and we have definitely discussed them, you know, depending if it's a frequently discussed issue Yeah. Then it is something that we have addressed in the chat.

You'll be

able to find it by doing a search.

For example, Sammy Gitt, you've asked what is Shrei's view of our the recent Qatar attack. You may Mhmm. Once again, I would like to refer you to that.

Okay. Yeah. Well, I was yeah. I was in the discussion group talking about it as it as as the news Unfolded.

Came Yeah.

What I'll say about the Qatar attack, I I said when it initially happened that it it my my my gut feeling was that it's unlikely that Qatar was not aware and did not accept this to happen. However, it's possible that it went sideways because I don't think that there was any if now, this is all obviously conjecture and speculation based on patterns in in the way the different players have relationships between the different players in the region. There is reason to believe that Atar was aware of this, approved it, agreed to it, just like the attack on the base, by the the Iranian attack on the base. Mhmm. That didn't come as a surprise to anyone.

That was choreographed. So it's possible that this was also choreographed. However, it's also possible that they didn't have any they did not approve for any Qataris to die in that attack. So when that happened, when Qataris were killed in that attack, the the the how to say, the plan is annulled. Mhmm.

And and now we're we're going to move in a different direction. The other possibility, of course, is that Netanyahu was just acting rogue. Mhmm. Even rogue against The United States, and he was just acting on his own. Now I know everyone knows how implausible that is.

It certainly is impossible. I'm just naming it as a possibility that he just operated on his own. Mhmm. The the official story that seems to be coming out and that Trump himself sort of put the story out Mhmm. Was that he learned about Netanyahu going to attack Qatar.

He was mortified that that was gonna happen, and then he tipped off the Qataris that it was going to happen. So that's sort of the official narrative now. Okay. That may or may not be true. Okay.

There are there are a number of ways for you to try to discern what actually happened. For example, there there are there are people on social media. There are outlets on social media, individuals on social media, and legacy media who are reliably liars, who are reliably spinners of narrative, who are reliably propagandists, neo con propagandists. So if you see them saying something, you'll know that what they're saying is completely wrong. So that helps you to dismiss certain narratives.

For example, Qatar is weak. Qatar got caught out Uh-huh. And they're afraid, and they're scared, and they're just kowtowing to America and so forth. Okay. So that we could put that aside now because I know that this is being said by people who've never done anything but lie.

Mhmm. So you can put that aside. I think that in a situation like this where the details of what happened are not clear and are probably not knowable, the best approach is to take a sort of a a a theory of geopolitics where you just look at the macro trends, the macro trajectories, and the momentum of those trajectories, and then just see, does this event now that now I'm not just talking about the event in other

Mhmm.

But just generally. This is a general way to approach this. When event happens that the, reason for it is not clear or the the motives are not clear, look at the trends, look at the trajectories and the momentum of those trajectories, and then see does this action halt that trajectory? Does it or does it halt the momentum? Does it reverse the momentum?

Does it accelerate the momentum, or is it none of the above? It has no effect whatsoever. Now if you look at the the situation in Qatar, it does nothing but accelerate the existing momentum. Mhmm. The momentum of the isolation of Israel Yeah.

The momentum of the elimination of Netanyahu from political life Yeah. The solidification of the Arab region on one strategy, on one agenda, on one plan, united plan Yeah. And the removal of America actively Yeah. As a mediator Mhmm. And as well as the removal of American military force Mhmm.

From The Gulf, the military bases. Mhmm. All of those things, that was already a trajectory that we're moving in. There was already a momentum that we were moving in. Now the attack on Qatar does nothing but accelerate that.

Yeah. It just solidifies

So then you can then you can that that will help inform your hypothesis about what happened and why.

Mhmm. Alright.

So Because because I'm sorry to interrupt, but but but because also there are some sometimes oftentimes, in in politics and in life, predictable behavior is manipulated. Yeah. It doesn't mean that the that the actor whose behavior is being manipulated is taking orders. Mhmm. But I know how you're gonna

act. Yeah.

So if I do this, I know that you will do that. Mhmm. So I will do this so that I can get you to do that. You see what I mean? Yeah.

So for example, if you know that Netanyahu is in the position that he's in, he has all of these corruption cases. His the settlers are even storming against him. Even the settlers are against him. Mhmm. He's he's holding on by a thread politically.

Zionism is in its last last breaths, and his own political career is in its last breaths.

Mhmm.

The European Union is turning against them or has turned against them really. The Palestinian state is gonna be recognized by multiple European countries.

Mhmm.

You're about to have a UN vote on acknowledging or recognizing Palestinian state.

Mhmm.

So there are so many things happening, and he is a desperate man at this point. So you have to you have to look at you know, if he if you know that he's going to behave in a reckless manner, it's possible it's you can theorize that it's possible that he was given a green light to attack Qatar precisely because it would accelerate the trajectory and the momentum of everything that's been happening, and it will it will expedite the end of his political career. That's possible. I'm not saying that that's what happened Mhmm. But that's possible.

It's also possible that he just did it on his own. But either way, I said this about Syria when the when when Bashar al Assad was removed Mhmm. By a consensus of regional players

Uh-huh.

And Russia and China. When he was removed and and Iran, well, that's in the region. When he was removed and Sharah took power, there was all kind of discussion in our group, in the telegram group Mhmm. About, well, what about this or what about that, and what about the Jews, what about the Christians, and what about Egypt, and what about this, and so on, and ISIS, and and what about The US, and and all of these, and Israel. I said, look at the waters, not the boats.

Because most of the boats in these waters don't even have motors, don't have rudders, don't have sails. They move in the way that the water is moving. Mhmm. They're just like rudderless vessels in the water. They will move whatever way the current is moving.

Mhmm. So as long as you know which way the current is going, you don't have to busy yourself with the details about who's on which boat because everything is still moving in a certain direction. Yeah. And that's the case in The Middle East. Everything is moving in a certain trajectory.

When the when the recording is posted, please rewind to this section, listen to it again. This is really really critical in in whenever we assess or analyze anything.

I think so because you can you can get very busy.

Yeah. With all the noise.

Yeah. Yeah. And like everyone is busy now with the Charlie Kirk issue. Everyone is very busy with the suspect, and now there's gonna now they're gonna be even more busy about looking up the history of the suspect and whatever he ever said on Facebook and and Twitter and coming up with all kind of theories and so forth. And you're you you you'll waste so much time with this.

Yeah. We we are and we are supposed to be an example for mankind, so we should be distinct in our approach because our understanding is guided.

Right. You have to be able to separate the relevant from the irrelevant. What's what's relevant information and what's irrelevant information. And they want to keep you busy all the time with irrelevant information, making you think that it it's world changing information. If I get to the bottom of this, if I get these details, then, you know, it's it's gonna shake the world.

Yeah. But all of it is irrelevant.

Yeah. Okay. So moving on to the topic. So from, Substantive Masculinity, the quality of selflessness, we moved forward to Rudula not being performance. So masculinity is not performative.

So it's a very connected entirely. It's a very brief video, and I think we've already covered much of this subject. And then we proceeded to talk about how alarmism is not masculine. And how we have to have the ability, men, have to have the ability to accurately assess risks and danger. So that they can, you know, they'll they'll be able to balance whatever alarming information that comes to them against a set of contextual information to determine what level of concern is actually called for.

Mhmm.

And again, this is also tied with It's

tied it's

all exactly.

It's tied with politics. Yeah. Exactly. So tied tied with politics. Yeah.

Because because I've I've said this before, if you're in the middle nation discussion group, then you would have seen, for example, when the when the when the more recent attacks were going on between the tit for tat were going on between Iran and Israel. Uh-huh. Everyone everyone was in on social media, across social media, and even in the mainstream media. Oh, it's World War three.

Yes.

It's Armageddon. Everyone in the middle nation discussion group knew that that was not the case. Yeah. Everyone in the middle nation discussion group was calm, cool, and collected, and we knew what's really going on. Mhmm.

And we did not overreact. We didn't we didn't allow ourselves to be alarmed. When that's part of that again is because this is a thing that we've talked about many many times, region and politics and the relationships and everything like this. So that's the reason for that. But just as a general rule, when something happens that is alarming, your knee jerk reaction should not be to immediately talk about it on Twitter, on TikTok, on X, on YouTube, or what have you.

Mhmm. Your immediate reaction should be silence and observation and deliberation and reflection, and try to understand what what has just happened. Mhmm. Measure it, weigh it, know the parameters of it, know the the shape of it, and and and make a a reasoned calm assessment of how much danger or risk is involved in this issue and or this event that has just happened rather than immediately flying off the handle. Mhmm.

And and, I mean, we would be in World War five by now, at least. As many times as we've been told that World War three is about to pop off, it was gonna pop off with Ukraine. Mhmm. It's gonna pop off with Iran a couple of times. Now that they attacked Qatar, oh, it's gonna be World War three again.

Okay? We would already have had multiple world wars by now

Yeah.

If if that had if they if these analysts were right. All of these analysts, by the way, who said these types of things, if you follow them, you should unfollow them. Go back on anyone's on anyone's Twitter thread or X thread, what do you call, feed their account. Anyone who has just just, you know, search the word. Search search their account and and the term WW one one one

Okay.

Three three, you know, w w three. Anyone who has said has even used the term in the last six months to a year, just unfollow them because they don't know what they're talking about.

Yeah. Again, to to use to exaggerate the importance of like isolated incidents, to create hysteria and and panic, you know, just to drive, I don't know, people to your content or whatever.

Exactly. It's all sensationalistic. Just for the point of driving engagement.

Exactly. And okay. So

Which is really despicable. This is very despicable in my opinion. Mhmm. And it's and it's it's it's very poisonous, and you're poisoning your culture, you're poisoning your society, not just individual minds.

Mhmm.

You're poisoning like, because you get you get trapped in a in a whirlpool, in an algorithmic whirlpool that just pulls you down, that just drags you down into a crisis state in your mind where you really feel like the whole world is falling apart and the sky is gonna fall down. And then this can drive you to desperate actions. Mhmm. It can not just drive you mental. Yeah.

You know, you you become, you know, the anxiety and the stress and the what and and then this can potentially drive you to the actions of, for example, the person who just shot that man.

Yeah.

That boy. Obviously, everyone is going to be talking about whether or not he's a plant, whether he's real, whether he's Mossad, whether he's blah blah blah. I don't care. I I could care less Mhmm. What he is.

And and I'll just say, I don't know if people in the chat are asking about this this topic. Not yet. Okay. I'm surprised. That's that's that's good on the chat.

Yeah. The the they just announced that they've captured, that they've arrested a boy, a 20 year old boy who supposedly is the one who shot the 31 year old boy.

Okay.

I'm just I'll just say for for the record and for anyone who who wants to to hear my opinion about that, it is completely irrelevant who the identity is and what his motives were. And why is it irrelevant? Because it happened in America. It happened in America, and in America, the only thing that matters is narratives. And it doesn't matter what the police investigation doesn't matter what law enforcement concludes.

It doesn't matter what the judges say, what the court says, what his sentence is, or what have you. No one cares about that because everyone is gonna follow whatever narrative suits their political agendas.

Right.

There is never gonna be a unanimous acceptance of whatever law enforcement concludes about this boy. Mhmm. Never. Just like there isn't until now about Kennedy, there isn't about 09:11, there isn't about Martin Luther King's assassination, there isn't even about Malcolm X's assassination or any assassination, RFK's assassination. Mhmm.

There's no consensus. There's no consensus. There's no unanimity.

Uh-huh.

Everyone does not accept the official version, and that will be the case with this case. Mhmm. Everyone will follow whatever Mhmm. Narrative suits their agenda.

Yeah. Today and years from now.

So it it if if the killing happened in a civilized country, in an intelligent country, then it would matter who did it. Mhmm. And it would matter why they did it, and it would matter what the investigation found. All of that would matter. And the conclusion of the law enforcement investigation would be accepted by the public.

There wouldn't be any any dissenting strange theories about it. But this happened in America. Therefore, anything that happens into in in America is immediately inserted into the narrative meat grinder, and what comes out comes out. And it has no resemblance to truth whatsoever, and no one cares. Yep.

Because if like we were talking we were sort of joking about it in the chat. Niall said, what? Jewish Jewish candles were found in his dresser drawer. Okay. Okay.

They weren't, but all that has to happen is for someone to say that they were Yeah. And now that becomes part of the lore. Mhmm. That becomes part of the narrative. And obviously, we we've seen over the last since it happened, there's a narrative developing that Charlie Kirk was gonna change sides against Israel.

I see.

And that he was gonna, you know, take a different position. And therefore, Israel killed him, and then a guy heard from a guy who's close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie Kirk said that he's afraid Israel is gonna kill him if he turns against them and blah blah blah blah blah. Okay? All of this is because, I know we're not this isn't the topic that we're supposed to be covering. All of this is because Israel is finished.

Zionism is finished. The OCGFC, the a national OCGFC, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital, no longer have a use

Yeah.

For Zionism. Now Zionism and Israel, as it has as it has existed for the last seventy years

Mhmm.

Is a liability now. Mhmm. Now you have a population that you radicalized in America, the right wing, who are by nature to the bone hate Jews Yeah. To the bone, these fundamentalist Christians Mhmm. These KKK progeny

Yeah.

Hate Jews at the core of their being. Uh-huh. And now they're all pro Israel. And even their pro Israel status, even their pro Israel stance, their pro Zionist stance is based on the desire for the annihilation of the Jews on the end times. Mhmm.

They we're going to bring about the Armageddon so that all the Jews can die. So so even their love for Israel is based on their hatred hatred of the Jews. So they have it in their bones to hate Jews, but but you have programmed them to suppress that and to love Israel

Yeah.

And to talk like that cartoon Ted Cruz about the well, the Bible tells me to love Israel and so on.

Right.

Okay. Now you have to deprogram them. Yeah. You have to let them know, no, you can actually remove the the lid on your anti Jewish hatred now. Mhmm.

And you've had Candace Owens, you've had Tucker Carlson, you've had a number of others. Dan, what's his name? The Armenian. A number of others who are helping the right wing white evangelical Christian Zionists come to terms with and to reconcile themselves with, it's actually okay Right. For me to just come out as a flaming anti Semite.

I hate to use that term because obviously it's wrong.

Right.

Flaming hater of Jews.

Yeah.

And but one of the purposes of that service obviously also is that it washes the blame of America. Mhmm. That's one of reasons why they talk about IPAC all the time. Yeah. And why they say that that these that these sterling congressmen and congresswomen and senators and powerful people had to be blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein to support Israel.

Right.

Like like the millions of dollars that they get from the defense sector isn't enough. Mhmm. So this narrative now, there there was a narrative that was developing since Charlie Kirk was killed that the Mossad did it, that Israel did it, and Allahu Adam. Allahu Adam. It's possible.

It's not impossible. It's possible. But the point of the but the point here is that that's a narrative that they're pushing to serve a political agenda, which is the agenda of that is in line with or aligned with

Yeah.

The existing trajectory and momentum. Mhmm. So it may or may not be true, but spreading that narrative has a function and has a purpose. Because certainly, you and I both know if if it was true, if it is true that Mossad did it, you would never find out. Yeah.

Because precisely for the same reasons that you that that same faction, that same political faction talks about, Jewish control of anything and everything, Jewish control of the media, Jewish control of finance, Jewish control of the banks, Jewish control of politics, Jews control the whole world, and so on and so on and so on. That same faction is the ones that would be saying that the Israelis are the ones who killed Charlie Kirk. Right. Well, how did they let that get out? How did they let you find that out?

How did they let that information leak Yeah. When they have such control? Maybe they did. But again, my point I'll go back to the point of if an event happens and the details of that event are unclear, and the reasons for that event are unclear, let's move to something that is clear, which is existing momentum and trajectories.

Okay. So there are about 300 plus people.

We have

about fifteen minutes to go.

Okay. Sorry.

We'll try

to get through this.

I was just yeah. So the next one okay. The next one now, we go into a little bit more of the sociology sociological aspect of the Kabomon series. The title is Don't Deny Your Father. Here, we are trying to get to the root of the these ideas that are not natural.

Red pill theory and all of its offshoots are related and related concepts are derived from and informed by the theory of evolution and evolutionary psychology. And all of these are based upon the belief that human beings evolved from ape like animals. So the entire understanding of human being and psyche is drawn from the study of the animal kingdom. Okay? No such foundation can ever provide meaningful insight into our lives and natures.

Least of all for the Muslims.

Yeah. And I remember I remember when I made that video Yeah. I found it very ironic that this is being pushed by people who are supposedly pro men and pro act pro pro pro what men's rights

Mhmm.

Pro fathers and all of this. Mhmm. And everything that you're pushing is based on a denial of Adam On Nabi Adam, our father, the father of mankind, the father of humanity. I find that very it's ironic. It's contradictory Mhmm.

That you are supposedly, you know, trying to uplift men, husbands, fathers, and the the core of everything that you believe in is that we're animals

Right.

Which means that you're denying our actual origin, which means that you're denying our actual father, the father of the human race. It doesn't matter to me if there are people who still choose to reject that Mhmm. If they're atheists or agnostics or people who otherwise are ashamed of their religious belief Okay. And feel that I need to find some kind of a way to make it reconcile with science. Right.

So I'll come up with all kind of mental gymnastics. What happened is exactly what Allah said happened. Adam was created exactly the way that Allah said he was created. The human race is a special unique creation Mhmm. On this earth.

Mhmm. We're not animals. We can't learn anything from animals.

Mhmm.

That's not well, the only thing that we can learn from animals is the is the magnitude of Allah's ability to create and say subhanAllah when we look at everything that Allah create. But but we we we don't guide our behavior by studying beasts. Mhmm. And this even this the what alpha male idea Mhmm. Was derived from the study of wolves.

What are you gonna learn about yourself Okay. From studying a wild dog? This is it's it's ludicrous. Mhmm. But you accept it as because it's supposedly based on some kind of science.

Mhmm. Evolutionary science, and then then they came up with a quasi scientific evolutionary psychology Mhmm. Which is all mumbo jumbo, which is all ridiculous. And anyone who's involved in psychology, which is already debatable to what extent you can even call psychology itself a science.

Yeah.

But even people who are in psychology scoff at evolutionary psychology. Mhmm. You know? So, yes, it it it's you you have to if you don't accept, if you don't understand the reality that human beings are a unique special creation on this earth with a unique purpose Mhmm. With unique faculties, if you don't understand that, then you certainly can't teach anyone how to be a man.

Yeah. Alright. Now, moving forward.

Alright.

The next video, on October, we were talk we went through the video titled, don't expect praise don't expect to be praised for being a man. Mhmm. Don't expect, you know. So in here, we're taught we basically covered the fact that men's marital rights are very few while their responsibilities are vast, that their role involves dealing with the slings and arrows of life, absorbing blows, taking hits with very little to no recognition, and being frequently criticized, berated, mistreated, doubted, ignored, and even resented. Mhmm.

I mean, is in a microcosm. Once again Mhmm. In a, know, in a macro level Mhmm. It applies to heads of states.

Mhmm. Absolutely.

Our Muslim leaders,

you know. Absolutely.

So again, a man's wife and family may not understand his struggles or the difficulties he faces.

They won't.

And the whole point of his role is to be taken for granted, in being continuously relied upon, dependent upon, and needed by his dependents.

If you're yeah. In fact, if you're doing your job properly as a man, you will know that because you are being taken for granted. Mhmm. That's the sign that you're doing your job properly as a man. Okay.

See, you know, this again, because of the first of all, the the basis of this problem in the West is among red pilled people Mhmm. And people who pretend to to be pro, I don't know, masculinity, pro man, or what have you. The the the the basis of the confusion here is the materialism and the the seeking after attention, seeking after praise, seeking after validation, and wanting to get things. And, all of these are inferior traits. These are all in these are all deficiencies.

Everything that that you that the West teaches you, you should want and teaches you how to be, all of those are deficiencies. Seeking attention, seeking validation, wanting to be appreciated, wanting to be thanked, wanting to be complimented, wanting to get material things, and so on. These are all deficiencies of character. Not these are not things that you should want as a man. These are not things that you should pine for.

Now we we we the only thing that we really do want from those that we love and those that we take care of is appreciation. We wanna be appreciated, and we wanna be respected. Mhmm. We know we're not gonna be understood. We know that we're not going to have that we know that our struggles, we know that everything that we grapple with and everything that we do is not going to be comprehended by those who do we who we take care of, which is why we're the ones taking care of them.

Mhmm. You understand? Because we're the ones who have the qualification to do that. Like, the the the person at a at a at a certain entry level position in a in a company doesn't know anything about what the CEO has to grapple with, what the what the CEO or the owner of the company has to do. That's why they're in different jobs.

And I find it also funny that you have men who will complain about all of what you just said, that that we don't get thanked, don't get understood, we don't get appreciation, we don't get compliments, we don't blah blah blah blah blah, we don't get praise and so forth. Mhmm. They'll complain about that, but then they'll brag about how much they can lift at the gym. You understand the connection? Mhmm.

You're proud of your strength when it's just muscles. You're proud of the burdens that you can carry Mhmm. When it's just physical. Mhmm. But the psychological burdens that you carry, the responsibilities that you carry, you're supposed to be proud of that.

Yeah. You know what I'm saying? So you should have the same approach. Barre. Like you you want to be the one who can carry the heaviest weight.

Mhmm. When you're at the gym Mhmm. You want to be the one who can bench press the the the the heaviest Yeah. Weights the biggest bench press Mhmm. Dead lift or what have you.

You want to be the one to do that. But when it comes to responsibilities, you don't want to be the one to do that. Why? That's that's inconsistent. When when the the one is not actually an indication of your masculinity, but the other is.

If you can bear all of the the all of the responsibilities, you can bear the psychological struggles that men have to go through in order to take care of their families. You can bear that without any of the anxiety or the stress or the turmoil that goes on in your struggle touching your family. Yeah. That's something that a man is proud of. Mhmm.

You wanna you wanna keep your you wanna keep all of everything that you're going through completely apart from your family, from your wife, from your children, and so on. No one's supposed to know what you go through. Mhmm. And if you want people to know what you go through, then I'm sorry, that's not manly, that's not masculine at all. Mhmm.

No one's supposed to even know what you go through. That's why I said, if you're doing your job as a man, you'll be taken for granted.

Mhmm. Alright. Now, just quickly going to the next part, next video, we talked about gender equality being a gender equality is a magical belief. So basically, you know, science and history actually demonstrating that men and women are not equal, not even close, and trying to reshape that reality and society to affirm otherwise is a fool's errand, and we, the Muslims, are not gonna fall

for it. Yeah. I

think this is we we can

It's fairly it's fairly clear, I think. Yeah. I mean, it it it sort of it sort of goes back to what I was just talking about, which is that you have accepted the the this idea of equality. Mhmm. So now men who call themselves masculine and who call themselves masculinity coaches

Mhmm.

Men men's coaches and so forth. You're saying according to the principle of equality, now I want the things that women have. Now I wanna now I want all the things that the women have. I want I want the praise, I want the flattery, I want the compliments, I want the stuff, you know. I want the the the fancy things.

I wanna be able to I I wanna I wanna have you pay for the dinner Yeah. And so on, you know. Now I want all the things that that women have because I've I've I've bought this delusional idea of men and women's equality.

Yeah.

Now if see the I know that the problem kinda comes up because women believe it. Mhmm. Women have been made to believe it. Even though there's no evidence for it whatsoever in terms of now people people will argue about, well, their brains are the same and they're this and that the other. I I I'm not interested in that.

I'm interested in lived reality of all people, of all time, forever. Men and women are not equal, they're obviously extremely different. Just as a man is different from another man, and a woman is different from another woman, then the whole idea of equality across two entire categories of humanity is absurd on the face of it. This is why it's a magical delusional belief. Mhmm.

Women have been convinced of

it. Mhmm.

And that in and of itself is a sign, is a proof of the inequality. Yeah. Because if you've actually convinced yourself of that when you are clearly, there's no evidence for this. Mhmm. The the this if you believe in the if you believe in the equality, this is in in and of itself a proof of inequality.

Mhmm.

Okay. Then continuing on from that, we went to talk about pirouma and minding your own business. Basically, minding your lay, masculinity, and women's spaces. If the women are not, if these are women that you are not responsible for, it's none of your business.

It's not your job.

Yeah. So this is just the bottom line of that particular video. And then on day 40, we featured the video Warlords and Ideal Men.

Ah, okay. The Jordan Peterson?

Yeah. The as a response to some of the Jordan Peterson and

Sam Harrison.

Yeah. Because again, it deals with the Wawa. It's not men with the it's not relationship Right. Per se, but you know, again, if just to recap, people like Sam Harris and John Peterson, they they like to, you know, malign Islam because they claim that Rasulullah was a warlord. Mhmm.

And basically, for us, what we know is that he it simply means that the prophet engaged in and regulated the inevitability of human conflict essentially. Right? Which increases not detracts from his value as a as a role model and archetypal ideal man, you know, just going by the language that Peterson goes. But the Christian version of prophet Nabiisa that they have provided the West with no realistic example to follow.

Yes. Of

course. So therefore Peterson's ideal man leaves followers with no ethical or moral guidance.

Mhmm. And and there's no better example of that than than Peterson himself. Exactly. There's no better example of that. Mhmm.

Peterson who says that that prophet Muhammad was involved in wars, was involved in violence, and that Islam includes laws with regards to violence Mhmm. With regards to combat and conflict and war and so forth. That therefore Islam is a violent religion and Jesus in the bible never had anything to do with any of that. Mhmm. And then tweeting, give them hell.

Kill the Palestinians. Mhmm. Finish them off. Okay. This is this is all you need to know.

Mhmm. Your religion did not equip you for the real world. Mhmm. The version of the version of Isa, the version of Jesus, prophet Jesus, that you invented is completely useless as a as a role model in the real world. That that that's not don't misunderstand me.

Prophet in real life was not irrelevant or or useless in the real world, but you took away everything that was useful. Mhmm. And you created a completely Fictitious. Fictitious version.

Yeah.

Fictitious version. Yeah. That can't guide you in this life. Mhmm.

Okay. Now going on to the last two

videos Sorry. Sorry. Yeah. Ahead. Also Yeah.

You want to say that you oppose prophet Muhammad Mhmm. Because he was a warlord. Mhmm. That's a way of saying that that's not exactly what you are. Yep.

That's a way of of of by implication. Yeah. Oh, I'm just aghast at the idea of violence. Exactly. I I just believe in peace and love and happiness.

Right. When you've been anything but.

When you've been anything but.

Yeah. Now, the last two videos, now the second day 41, we the video is titled leave her turbulence alone. Once again, this is again a simple video. Basically, women are not entirely complicated, although they like to put forth that they are. Mhmm.

But inherently very simple, but they appear complicate complicated due to internal turbulence or emotional fluctuations, and how men should actually not attempt to resolve this turbulence, but rather exercise selective, strategic, compassionate, dismissiveness. Being involved in a woman's emotional complexities can escalate minor issues into significant conflicts. So instead, men ought to remain supportive and patient without trying to comprehend or fix these internal struggles as they are an ongoing aspect of women's experiences.

And they're they're they're mostly sort themselves out Mhmm. Most of the time. Mhmm. I think I think part of this I think part of the problem comes about, honestly, you know. I don't think that it's because men men want to solve problems, men want their, their wives to be happy.

So when a woman comes with her turmoil and her turbulence, well, we wanna solve it. Mhmm. And you shouldn't you shouldn't bother because it's gonna be fine. She's gonna be fine. Yeah.

You know? Like, if if you ask if you if you ask a woman, you know, coffee, tea, or milk, or what have you, you know, like they ask on a plane Yeah. She'll ask for tea, but she'll ask if she can have a storm in it. Yeah. Because they like to have a storm in a teacup, and that's and that's mostly what women deal with.

They like, I don't know if they like it, but they're they're prone to a completely unnecessary drama that usually does not need a reaction.

Okay. So finally, the video that we discussed was it's titled, it's my table.

Oh, it's my table. Yes.

Yeah. So, again, this is again a popular query that goes around.

What do you bring to the table? Yeah. So

I need not say more. So this is the Mhmm. The last video, and we've already crossed an hour. So again, what do you bring to the table? What's the problem with this question?

Well, I mean, video itself answers that question.

Yeah.

I would say it was a very popular video, by the way, especially on TikTok. It went around a lot. And I I think it went it went around a lot by a lot of women shared that video Mhmm. Who would never be invited to the table in the first place. Because my my point in that video was it's my table.

I'm the host. I don't need you to bring anything. If I have invited you to my banquet, to my feast, you don't need to bring anything. It's not a potluck. Mhmm.

I'm the one who provides. Mhmm. Because that's what a man is supposed to do. We're the ones who who provide. So I'm not asking you what you bring to the table.

I have already just like when you do invite someone to your dinner to a dinner, when you invite someone to a banquet, it's not an open invitation. Mhmm. Have guests that you select Mhmm. That you want to bring to your table based upon the fact that you think that they're gonna be good guests Mhmm. That you already appreciate them.

You've already vetted them, Jani. Okay. So there was a lot of people who shared that video and who commented on that video and who liked that video who would never have been invited to the table in the first place. You already don't qualify. Yeah.

And then there were people who complained saying, oh, said guests. Yeah. First of all, they were angry because I used plural. Mhmm. Well, I'm a Muslim.

Mhmm. I can have more than one guest at my table. As a husband, I can have more than one wife. I can have four. Mhmm.

So I said guests. I use plural. Mhmm. That is not gonna apply to you people who haven't come to your senses yet and come to Islam. But then the other thing was, oh, he said guest, he didn't say, like, we're not partners.

It's like I'm a guest

Right.

And it's his table, his rules. Yes. Correct. Yes. That's correct.

Yeah. It's Because you're not my sister. We're not related by blood. Uh-huh. You are in a relationship with me as long as we both consent to that.

Mhmm. As long as we both agree on that. That this is in Islam, this is a contractual agreement between the two of us, and that contract can be nulled. Mhmm. We can agree two part ways.

Mhmm. The table in this scenario or in that analogy, the table is my life, it's everything that I've built, it's everything that I am, it's everything that I have. So yes, you're a guest in my life because you're not my you're not my kin, you're not we're not related by blood. Yeah. You're here because I invited you here and you accepted that invitation.

Mhmm. And as long as you behave well and as long as I behave well, we'll stay together. Mhmm. Do you understand? So of course, guest, if you don't understand that some that anyone else in your life who isn't a family member, if you don't understand anyone in your life who isn't a family member is a guest in your life.

Mhmm. Period. They're a guest in your life.

Okay. We we have a a fan pumping question.

Oh. One

one question.

Okay.

Hungry Hippos, thoughts on the recent UN Security Council where Pakistan and Israel got into it. Can we expect Pakistan to get more involved?

I I would doubt that Pakistan will get more involved. I think Pakistan is very interested in trying to join breaks. Okay. That that will have colored their behavior Mhmm. At the Iran.

To be honest, I haven't seen the Yeah. When you talk about them getting into it. Okay. I was watching the the the meeting, but I didn't I didn't I didn't see the Pakistan

Okay.

Section. Alright. I just wanted to say to anyone who has been asking questions or making comments, my eyesight is very bad, so I can't see them at all. I'm relying on my wife to read the comments to me or to select the comments.

Yes. I am

So if I so don't think I'm ignoring you, Yani. I can't I can't see the comments.

Okay. So once again, this brings me to the this is the end of the videos that we

Okay.

Went over. We went over a dozen videos over the past twelve days, eight video a day, and then now we've resumed the long format videos and each video will be for this particular video is almost an hour long. It will be at least six days.

Okay. That's the that now we're moving into the area of psychological decolonization.

Psychological decolonization, and we're talking about how to

The first video is radical realism, is it?

Yes. Radical realism. And for and I would like to also point out for participants who are listening in and who want to join, I know it's very difficult to not watch the entire video and then make your contribution in its entirety. But I would I break down the videos in sections because every section needs to be properly consumed and extracted and understood before we move on to the the next section. I mean, I don't know if Sharif made the content with that intent, but when I view it and and plan the prompts, I go according to how each section would enhance your understanding.

So it's like a flow, you know. So it's essential that you follow along the prompts and not go over

the That's really yeah. Masha'allah, that's really doing a great service in my opinion because I know that first of all, there's a huge number of videos, and then any any single video I believe is quite dense

Yeah.

In in in the what's being conveyed. Mhmm. And so I think to break them down into manageable sections, manageable segments is very valuable. So, if you if you come to the telegram, group and you join the challenge and follow the prompts, then, yes, please actually follow or or watch only the segment that has Okay. I removed the microphone.

The sound quality is gonna be very bad. My microphone wasn't fully charged, unfortunately. I hope you can hear me. Can you hear me now? Confirm?

Yes. It's back.

Okay. The sound will be bad now because I don't have the microphone. Just watch the segment that has been allotted for that day. Mhmm. This is also doing making it easier for you that you don't have to watch what is almost an hour long video.

Yeah. Just watch however many minutes there are Yes. For that day, and then you can can craft your your content based on that particular thing. This is a a very good teaching and learning approach, I think. It's it's almost like a curriculum of being able to break down the videos into into manageable, absorbable segments.

Yeah. I

think we we should probably close off.

Yes. We've already crossed the hour, and I think we should close Alright. For the session.

Well, thanks, everyone. Yeah.

We will be meeting again in about six to seven days from now.

Six about a week? Yeah. So we'll have another live, inshaAllah, in about a week's time, inshaAllah. But, again, we'll I'll put when I when I put this video up on on on YouTube Mhmm. I'll put a link to the discussion group as well.

InshaAllah. InshaAllah. Okay. Everyone for joining, and

0:00 / 72:20

تمّ بحمد الله