MN Content Talk: White Supremacy's Blame Game | Part Two

Assalamu alaikum. Assalamu alaikum, everyone. Welcome to another session of content talks. Okay. So we finished last time we were doing the video titled white supremacy blame game.

Okay? So it was really about this idea of shifting the blame for atrocities, for injustices, for, you know, all of these negative things that they did trying to shift the blame on someone else. Right? So this was the main idea of the video. Divided it into, like, roughly 10 sections in which we go over the different aspects that Ustaz mentions in the video.

Yeah? So we managed to do the first three parts, which were really related. First of all, it was you know, this video for people who have not maybe listened to it was about the that we really need to erect our partitions. Right? And there's no place for ingenuine debate or, like, communication with people who are really trying to harm the discussion.

So this was the main starting point of this whole video. It was about an x space where some person you know, I'll not mention the name, but some type of person with this westerner mindset tried to somehow provoke the space, tried to make people uncomfortable, tried to derail them, tried to derail the conversation. So, you know, noticed that, and he really just made this video because this is the whole Western approach. Right? And we spoke about the Western approach to even getting to the truth of understanding stuff.

It's all about this debating, about questioning, being critical, being, you know, even pessimistic at times. Right? So all of this was part of the discussion last week. In case you're interested, it's been uploaded on YouTube. It's on spaces as well.

Then we moved on to really like, because this blame shifting has to somehow be you know, it's even historically. Right? So we looked at different instances in the historical from the historical perspective, and we also understood that most of these instances were based on the normal dunya wi western mindset type of approach. Right? It it's not something, you know, we think about it that there was some ideologies related to it and so on, but, really, it's all about profits.

It's all about the complicity of the major institutions, how they profited from it. And we understand the realities nowadays in this fashion, so why cannot we understand the history in the same manner. Alright? It's always some type of monetary interests in these injustices. We finished those parts.

We discussed them in detail. So now we are at part four, which is blame shifting as moral cowardice. Okay? And I always proceed in a manner that I play part of the video that discusses the specific aspect, and then I pause it, we discuss it, and then we move on, inshallah, to the next part. Okay?

So now I will play this part of the video. Inshallah. So miss.

Just be honest. I mean, of course, Jews did participate across the year. That was a lucrative evil that you normalize. But make no mistake about it. That was a white European Christian enterprise.

Jews had a walk on role as historical ledger by ledger review of every surviving British and American slave voyage puts the Jews share of the Atlantic traffic well under 2%. That's a statistical whisper beside the roar of Christian capital. Let's be serious. So, no, the slave trade was not some covert, semantic conspiracy hoisted on the European. It was an enterprise conceived, financed, and defended by Christian and Cuba power.

It would just sample the corner of the poison banquet that the European just laid themselves. They spread that banquet out. Now that's not to exonerate anyone who is involved in that. It's just facts. This is just the facts.

You were the buyers. You were the transporters. You were the owners. You were the slave drivers, and everybody knows it. You wanna put every wicked thing that you've done at the feet of the Jews.

You know? Were the Jews masterminds behind the Spanish inquisition? Were they masterminds behind the crusades? The same the the the saving witch hunts? You know?

The Jews, I suppose, made you genocide the native Americans. The Jews made you lynch African Americans. The Jews made you drop the atomic bombs on Japan. Right? Every evil, every inhuman thing that you've done was done at the behest of the Jews or was done because the Jews

Yeah. Exactly. So that's the part, that we'll be discussing now. So yeah. So I'll start off, inshallah.

Welcome brother and to the chat. Please accept the microphone, inshallah, whenever you are free to do so. So I mean, this is the purpose of what we're doing. We inshallah hope to gain, you know, pure knowledge and truth. Yeah.

So what drives certain narratives to exaggerate this minority involvement? Okay. Just to clarify, when I speak of minority, we all know from, you know, again, another content of Ustad Shaheed that this is the global majority. But in The USA or in the West, they are called minorities. Right?

But we do not think about them as minorities. But let's just for the sake of understanding, you know, the word, what I mean are the small groups that were always targeted and blamed for any injustice that the Westerners did. K? Is this emphasis on a statistically negligible minority sort of a mechanism for deflecting some truth and mostly uncomfortable truth about majority complicity in crimes? How does it shape our collective willingness to face moral accountability when we keep on, you know, deflecting onto others?

Why does it seem easier for Westerners to blame external groups rather than confront the reality that these atrocities were largely shaped by their own institutions and values? Values, quote unquote. Right? How might our collective consciousness shift if we prioritize historical accuracy over scapegoating and if we acknowledge the full extent of the majority responsibility? Can the West and Westerners meaningfully reconcile with their best if they continue to evade accountability by projecting their own moral failings onto external groups.

So, please, the floor is yours, my dear esteemed speakers. Feel free to chime in whoever wants to go first.

I would like to start with pointing out, obviously, the similarities between the current situation with Charlie Kirk and the main topic that works like, we're talking about today. Obviously, same kind of model is being used here repeatedly with the West. And so when you kind of start to deconstruct what they're doing, which basically tells us the direction of where they're going and whether or not they can actually meaningfully reconcile with their past or not, you'll find a consistent pattern of, first of all, polarization followed by abstraction. And the abstraction is exactly in this blame shifting, this constant blame shifting. It makes it hard for actual intelligent truth seekers to seek out the truth, as well as it makes it for the people that don't want to do so to find an excuse by saying either that it's, like, hard or that it doesn't matter, so on and so forth.

And so you'll notice that the polarization has to be done first. There has to be this highlighting of a specific group or highlighting of both opposite ends that aren't really opposite. Think of a spectrum that we're dealing with, and we know that life in general and dunya operates in gradually, like, gradients. Right? It's not really operating in chunks or nodes.

There are obviously things that are more akin to nodes in life, but most things operate based on a spectrum. And so think that when you're operating on a spectrum, what the West does consistently is they highlight both ends of the spectrum, and then they abstract the middle so that the connection between the two highlighted ends diminishes and becomes very difficult to pinpoint. That way, you're kind of always pushed to only see the highlighted so called opposites, And then they can continue to blame shift. They can continue to normalize this polarized perspective of the world and make people internalize it, and then they crystallize it, which is basically the phase where you can't even have a constructive conversation with someone where you can open their eyes.

Well, you know, how do you connect it to this exaggeration of minority involvement? Right? Like, I understand what you're saying, and I'm not saying it's not correct. It is. This polarization, they even present for you the spectrum.

Right? This is the spectrum that you are allowed to function in. This is part of how they construct these narratives, how they construct their perception or, you know, this narrative creation and everything. But I'm really asking why specifically do they exaggerate minority involvement. Right?

Like, you know, it's some sort of whenever something whenever they do some injustice, immediately when they should face the repercussions of that injustice, they shift it onto someone else. Right? This is the mechanism that I'm trying to highlight because this is some psychological need or, like, some go to reaction. Right? Immediately, whenever you are blamed for something, let's some let's find someone who I can blame it on.

And most of the time, it's some minority group. So

the part where you see yeah. Why why does it seem, like, easier for the West to to to not just exaggerate, but to do like, they seem to it seems easier for them to do, like, like, shift the the the the blame on the minorities. I'm kind of reminded when the the very early stage of the in in Mecca where where they they felt like the prophet because again, if you you consider the situation carefully, you will see or you will notice that it was some there there's some semblance. So the Kufar are a majority and the Muslims are a minority. And the Muslims did nothing at all except that they adhere to a new religion.

They didn't practice any sort of violence. They weren't and, yeah, they weren't stealing anything. So no harm was being done at all by the Muslims. Yet all the narratives that we get in the seerah is that, you know, the elders of Quraish are always saying they are the reason of our decay. They are the reason of our you know, that this content that is in Mecca, it's all because of Muhammad and his followers.

So they are they are the harbingers of of of destruction. And this was being said before the Muslims made Hijra to Al Medina. This was being said for thirteen years during the Meccan period. So instead of, you know, confronting the injustices within their own system, within their own, you know, tribal malignant system, which, you know, takes wealth from the poor and, you know, practices or or, you know, cheats in in in in on many occasions and deceives on many occasions, you know, just for the reason that it can be done or, you know, practice some sort of brute force against the weak. So all of these injustices, you know, they were blamed on the Muslims, subhanAllah, while they didn't actually do anything of the sort.

They the they were doing that in the Muslims, in the they were preaching what is in actuality against all of these practices. But whenever you would hear any whenever any Arab would come to Mecca during the pilgrims pilgrimage season or during the Hajj season, and he would immediately find the elders of Parash or any nonbeliever from Parash saying, you know, this this whole thing in Mecca we're dealing with, this whole incident, you know, we're we're facing grave trouble. The Muslims are are are are great troublemakers. Not not us, not the not the Quraysh, not the practices we're we're we're we're doing. No.

It's the Muslims. It's the minority, the helpless minority who are actually done nothing. So I think it's there's a there's a resemblance in the psychology and the mindset that we want to preserve the status quo at any cost. And in in in so doing, we'll always blame the minority because the status quo was not they were filthy rich. They had respectable power amongst the Arabs.

Although the prophet was promising Qurayshan that if they adhere to Islam, they will even be more privileged because Islam was the the one for religion. And the Arabs, they respected Polish. And nevertheless, whether they were living in the their their own deities or in Allah's time, Arabs would follow Polish because they were the keepers of the house. But they they didn't want any of that. They wanted to keep the status quo, and they were fearing that the Arabs might not follow them and so on and so forth.

So in in long story short, I'm sorry for taking so long, it's to preserve the status quo. And in order to preserve the status quo, which is them being rich and, you know, keeping the social fabric as it is and maintaining a leadership role in that amongst the Arabs, they tended to blame the the the Muslim minority in Mecca.

You know, subhanAllah, such great points. Right? Because in like, whenever you commit some crime, sin, or injustice or, you know, whatever negative, you have two options. Either you will admit it or you will have to say that someone else did it. Right?

Like, there is no other option. Right? It happened. So it had to be someone. Either it was you or it was someone else.

And as Muslims, we are taught always, you know, to take responsibility of our actions. Right? We always, you know, turn in and repentance, and we will look into it. Right? But this is the main distinction.

Right? Either own up to your actions and the effects that they have or just blame it on someone else. Right? Like, there is no other option. We as Muslims are, you know, told to take the first approach.

Right? Everyone else takes the second approach. Right? Some groups have put intermediaries in between to solve it for them. Right?

So the accountability is kinda, you know, outsourced, we can say. But yeah. So great points. Thank you, brother Omar. Please, brother Haleef, I'm sorry for keeping you.

I apologize. I will be staring. So that's what's said. I didn't know any the point honestly as to why why they are so reticent to accept responsibility, We kind of get to it towards the end of of what we're gonna get to, but let's just take it from the horse's mouth. You know, let's talk about the contemporary, what's on everybody's mind right now, whatever what happened in Utah with Charlie Kirk.

Governor of Utah himself, what did he say? He said, for thirty three hours, I've been praying that this person was from another country, that he he came from another state and maybe drove from another state, somebody came from another country. Sadly, that prayer was not answered the way I hoped for. But here's the key. Why did he say that?

He tells you. He says, just because I thought it would make it easier on us if we could just say, hey. We don't do that here. And that's the crux of it. They're looking for some level of ease because it's so much easier to not accept responsibility just as you mentioned, brother Riley, so so astutely just now that what are we called to do?

In the we understand that we're called to take responsibility for what we've done, and that is what is going to facilitate and motivate you towards which has an inherent level of accountability. You have to fess up to what you've done and then make changes. But if you're never willing to do that first step, you're never gonna get to that point. And what prevents you from that? Well, the first thing that prevents you from that is recognizing that it's difficult work.

It's tough to take on personal responsibility, but it has to be done. And you just see it there. I was just wishing that it was somebody else. And and look at look at what he says too. It's not just another country.

I mean, he also said another state just because quote unquote, we don't do that here and, you know, let's not even get into the fact that this is just what they've put out in the world as as Salish Shaheed has said many times coming back home to roost. These are the hands coming home to roost. This is what you do everywhere else. Why did you think you would be immune from it? But, you know, I could go on, but I don't wanna I don't wanna belabor the point because there's I'm sure we'll get to that later.

There's a couple of different ayats that we can talk about too that really touch on the lack of responsibility and what's what's at play here, but I think that's the crux of it. It's just so much easier to not accept responsibility to find someone else to blame. And they've taken the easy path just like their ideologue had has done since the beginning, and that is Iblis. Yeah.

Exactly. That that's all it boils down to. That's the you know, that was the first approach of, you know, the for a sin. Right? Like, Thank you, brother.

Please sister Nisa, and then we will go, inshallah, to brother Nabil.

Thank you so much for continuing today's content talks. You know, the fact that our topic today, you can see it is still happening, various aspects in our lives on in society. You know, that is shocking. This is a very important topic that we must always be speaking about because we need to make change. And with regards to the questions that you asked, Profound, our speakers have already, you know, touched on a few points like, definitely, to avoid accountability.

It makes it so much easier for them not to have to correct their behavior because they don't want to correct their behavior. The reason why they're scapegoating, for example, by focusing on corrupt African leaders, you know, within Africa, all you hear about is they have corrupt leaders. Their presidents are corrupt. While people tend to forget that the corrupted bill leaders needs a corrupting entity, so they forget that it is the same white supremacists, the same West that is corrupting those leaders that they are placing to be our so called guardians, our leaders. They are placing them there.

So it keeps victims in perpetual as perpetual victims. Therefore, people in that society thinks that it is normal. This is how life should be. Like, brother Shahid always talks about, you know, their their their ethos is might makes right. As a victim, you tend to believe that, okay, the most powerful is the most brutal, is the most horrific behavior.

That is what makes you powerful. So it is easier to subdue or subjugate mentally enslaved people or society than rational thinkers. And the main point that they want to or the main reason why they are doing it is because they want to maintain generational enslavement that is mentally and physically. So they're not just doing it just for this day and age, just for now, just for their benefit. They're also doing it for their offspring's benefit to to carry on their lineage in that manner and their legacy of colonialism and their legacy of being thus perceived as superior.

So that is what their main point is, is to keep the generational enslavement going.

Yeah. Great point, Like, if you put into people the might is right, then, you know, Halas, they're accustomed to this. This is the part of the colonization, as you mentioned, greatly, and it immediately puts you in a position of, like, perceived superiority just because you are you know, have better weapons or something. Like, it's crazy. Yeah.

Sorry. I don't know if brother Nabi wanted to say something. I see that maybe it was addressed. So please, brother Abdur Rahman or brother Nabi. I don't know.

I just wanna say you the first question you mentioned was what what is the roots to the blame shift and why do Westerners always blame shift? I think it was touched on by, I think, was it brother Jose Faitlou? I think, basically, it just comes down to the fact that the society is a spawn of Iblis, sorry to say. But Western society takes on the approach that at least took in Jannah when he was asked the question of to bow to Adam and he refused. And instead and his response was blaming it that he was weaker in the sense that he was made out of clay and I was made of fat.

So it's a combination of superiority and also blame shifting. At the same time, you feel you're so superior, and at the same time, you feel I can be I can't I can't be wrong. I no matter how wrong I am, it's not me. It's someone else. That's basically all I want to say, but that is a constant, I think, would I say, behavior within the West, and its roots its roots is Iblis.

The honest truth.

100%. 100%. And we will touch upon it in just, you know, two sections later because in the video does mention it. So we will look at it in. And so please keep your thoughts for that part.

And please, brother Abdul Rahman. I'm I'm sorry if you want me to call you for Abdul Rahman. I don't know, but I prefer to call people by their names. So if it's you know, just let me know if it's bad. So

You can call me whatever you like, brother. So to answer your question as to why this clear contradiction of claiming superiority was somehow also being manipulated by minority groups, and in my opinion, it's very evident because this system serves a purpose. I just wanna quote James Baldwin here from his book, The White Man's Guild. He says, people who imagine that history flatters them are impaled on their history like a butterfly on a pin and becoming capable of seeing or changing themselves or the world. They are dimly or vividly aware that the history they have fed themselves is mainly a lie, but they do not know how to release themselves from it, and they suffer enormously from the resulting personal incoherence.

Now what I'd like to point out is that they are not victims of this narrative. They are not victims of the slide. This this contradiction exists simply because this they don't want to change. It's not that they are unable to change because they are shackled by this narrative. It's this narrative exists so that they don't ever have to change, so they can keep doing what they have always done.

And we see this throughout their history. The scapegoating doesn't just serve to blame minorities for certain isolated incidents, but to portray them as the eternal enemy, right, throughout European history. Muslims are the existential threat to Christendom. Jews felt that they scapegoated for countless things from plagues to being the capitalist bankers while simultaneously being the Bolshevik communists despite declaring a contradiction, portraying their violence as tragic necessities or accidents. Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a tragedy, but it's justified.

But nine eleven is proof of Islamic evil. It is a it becomes a culture and religious blame when it's committed by nonminorities. Colonial genocides were unfortunate accents, but anticolonial uprising is barbaric.

Yeah. Thank you very much. Like, great points, and especially how you mentioned that it is a choice. It is a voluntary choice. Right?

It's not, like, nature. Because, you know, even with this might as right, they will say, yeah. Well, it's nature. Right? You know?

Always the stronger beast wins. Like, okay. Like, if you think about yourself as a beast, good for you, but, you know, don't just generalize on all people think that way. Right? So, usually, this again, it's something that as if, you know, I don't have control over it.

It's just how it is. Stronger will win. You know? So I'm stronger. It means I am right.

Right? So subhanAllah. And they their argument is that it's given, you know, by nature. Like, really? Is this given by nature?

SubhanAllah.

Yes. I would just like to add, it's also important to emphasize how the narrative changes and shifts and evolves. For example, the slavery of African enslavement of Africans was initially portrayed as a civilizing mission. You know, these people are not civilized. They're civilized.

We're we're doing them a favor. And when the and they invest a lot of resources into uplifting this narrative by inventing sciences that demonized and dehumanized Africans to make it a legitimate claim. And when the brutality of slavery became too big to ignore, they immediately point the blame to Africans and say, well, they were selling themselves, which is absurd, you know, to to to blame a people for their own enslavement. Like, the mental gymnastics you have to do to reach that conclusion is absolutely absurd. And as brother Nabil pointed out in a previous content talk, that everyone else's idea of slavery was completely different to the barbaric and brutal shuttle slavery that the West practiced.

And this is another one of their tricks. They want to make it seem like, oh, yeah. Everybody was doing it. No. No.

Nobody. As as said in one of his videos, nobody contributed more and innovated more in slavery than you did.

Okay. So, you know, the point is that a society that cannot honestly examine its past invariably undermines its present. Right? And if accountability remains, like, perpetually displaced, it just shows I think someone mentioned it at the beginning, this immaturity. Right?

I think brother Amaru, it was that it really is immature and brotherhood of variety because owning up to your actions is the, you know, adult thing to do. Right? Keeping on blaming something, that's just childish. Right? So it just reinforces this idea that there was never civilized because, like, they cannot own up to their actions even.

So how can you convince me that you're civilized when you keep on blaming someone else for any bad thing that you did? Alright? So subhanAllah. Yeah. There is an, like, moral labor that is required for any authentic reconciliation.

You know? But by constantly projecting the moral failing onto other groups, you are just escaping the first necessary step towards correcting your trajectory. Right? So with this, I think I hope, inshallah, we somehow took out what we could from this section. And if nobody has anything to add, I'll, inshallah, move on to the second section, which is exactly as, you know, brother Abdul Rahman somehow already highlighted a bit.

So see what I'm talking about.

Meanwhile, the same white supremacist, this Charlie Kirk clone on that x piece that I was listening to, was simultaneously spewing anti black racist diatribes about, you know, low IQ criminality, violent tendencies, on and on and on. The same old thing that you always hear from them. I mean, the man was embodying the exact mentality of the racist, dehumanizing white slave owners that he wants to pretend didn't exist, or he wants to pretend only existed because of the Jews. No. You were bad then and you're bad now.

And you can't even open your mouth except that you announce it yourself by your own words, even while you are trying to deflect and blame shift. You're racist. You're supremacist. You're cruel and heartless. And on top of all that, you're craving in cowardly because you do evil that you know is evil, but you wanna try to pin it on someone else.

You know? You don't even have the guts to just be wicked and own it yourself. And, you know, these are the same people who will say, well, you know, the Jews were kicked out of so many countries. There must be a reason. There has to be a reason for that.

Never grasping that the hatred and supremacism that leaks out of your pores gives us the answer. You know, the venom and the viciousness of your loathing is on full display all the time. They hate Jews. They hate Muslims. They hate Africans.

They hate Mexicans. They hate immigrants. It's endless. Who don't you hate? And always, their malice is cast as if it's their victim's fault.

Do you know how much you sound like a serial abuser talking about all these crazy exes? They're sick in the head. I mean, look. What are their excuses? Jews made you do it.

Right? You know? Festing black man. APAC. Whatever the case may be.

This is what they always say. Okay. Let's go with Epstein. Right? So it's his fault that you're pedophile.

Right? I mean, you're getting blackmailed. You said that that that Epstein is blackmailing all of these legislators and so forth. Means you did something, didn't you? You did something unspeakable, and Jeffrey Epstein just facilitated it and put it on tape.

That's just opportunistically taking advantage of your preexisting perversion. What kind of argument is that? An ABAC. Right? They give legislators donations.

Okay. So your argument is that you can be bribed. You know? You'll literally fund an armed genocide in exchange for what? A And that's your self exoneration?

That's your argument that you're actually good? The Jews made you do all these heinous crimes that you committed as a nation? Really? Then, honestly, how pathetic are you as a nation? How stupid are you as a nation?

How incompetent are you as a nation? How immoral are you as a nation? That's your argument. I mean, for a white western supremacist, you sure seem to believe that white westerners are the absolute dregs of mankind. You believe that apparently these white supreme white people have no agency, no willpower, no morality, no ethics, no conviction, no intelligence.

I mean, that's your own argument. That's not me. That's you saying it. Meanwhile, you believe in the the, you know, the superman, super Aryan super race, the master race. But according to you, this so called master race has been played with like a yo yo to do the bidding of Jews throughout all of your recorded history.

Subhanahu wah. Such a good part. Looking forward. Please, Sister Nisa.

I'm waiting actually for that section because my blood has been boiling for a while now because, I mean, just this week, we have in Australia protesting against immigration or something like that. White Australians, the irony of it all. A society that started as European convicts are now complaining about immigration in a country where they're not native. Another example is Democrats versus the republic Republicans in United States Of Americans to keep people confused of what the real truth is, what reality is, and just to keep them off what the what the truth is. So, they have these two party system just like many so called the demo, democratic countries.

South Africa is guilty of the very same thing even at a worse level because we've got so many different parties, but they all just there doing the bidding of the OCGFC, and they don't want us to know that. So we are all stuck trying to fight each other, whose party is the better one, who's the one really looking after us, when none of them are actually looking after our well-being. Because that is why it is meant to be that way. It is meant to just keep us in slavery while we are thinking that we are free. So that is the main thing that they need us to do is to keep us thinking and believing that we are free, but we are actually not.

And then, you know, the lies about it all where they act as if they're victims. Like I just said now in Australia, you know, they feel that too too many immigration is causing issues in in their country, inverted commas. Same with Europeans, you know, having an issue with immigrants coming to their country when they are the number one cause of displacement across the globe. They are the cause of it in the first place. So then they blame people causing, or causing maybe, infrastructure issues in their country, and all crime all of a sudden is just because of those very people that are now tied to their country, when in the meantime, they've already been acting like barbarians for centuries.

So, yeah, there's a lot of that going on where we find the same white supremacists are perpetual victims themselves as well, and that is only because things are balancing out. And to them, they want to be superior. And the moment they feel that somebody's coming to on their level, they feel that is operation. Thank you.

Thank you, sister Lisa. Yeah. SubhanAllah. I'll just let brother continue. Yeah.

SubhanAllah. Thank you, Nisa. These the the of a love for for when this this content talk is happening is is astounding. It was supposed to happen last week, but then or something happened where we're doing it this week now, and for that because the whole Charlie Kirk thing happened, and this video even talks about a a Kirk wannabe. And then there's so much that came out after that that really highlights the fundamental root of the contradictions in the logic of of, like, okay.

We have a superior ideology, but now we're gonna just ship blame and and talk about other people. Stay with me for a bit. This might be a bit of an esoteric point, and if it needs clarity, please let me know. But their forefather, their ideologue, his rhetoric is inherently violent by denying the supremacy of law, even though really he doesn't, but he tries to, you know, he tries to goad people into into denying it himself. The key point here though is after the after the Kirk thing, the reality of what's really happening comes comes to play.

And this is where it it the the point I'm making is that you have to be able to look at what the perpetrators tell you, and they get so big headed just like Iblis did that they will they will tell you they will tell on themselves. They will confess. You just have to be smart enough to notice it. And this is where it gets a little bit esoteric, so just follow me for a second. In in Iblis Iblis Ibn Jazi there is a quote from Hassan al Basri.

Iblis from the is Israeliad. It's it's a long narration. I'm not gonna go through all of it. But, essentially, he there's a man that wants to cut down a tree because people are worshiping it, and he wants to cut it down for the sake of Allah. Ibiz comes to him and tries to stop him, but he finds that he can't overpower it.

So he tries to convince him otherwise. He says, look. What is it harming you that these people are worshiping this tree? I'll give you if you stop if you don't cut it down. So Matt says, okay.

Fine. He comes the next day and he finds under the tree. He goes back. The day after that, he comes and he finds that there's no money under the tree. So he gets really angry.

He picks up his axe and comes back. But now I believe he comes again, this time not in human form, in his true form. The man says, who are you? And what do you wish to do to me? Sorry.

Who are you? And then the man says he says, I am, you know, I am am Shaitan. What do you wish to do? He says, I wanna cut down this tree that's being worshipped in the place of Allah. So Shaitan says to him, you lie.

You have no power to do so. The man continued walking, but this time, Iblis was able to overpower him and wrestle him to the ground, and he this is where he pulls on himself. He says, initially, you were angry for Allah's sake, but now and then I had no power over you, but now I deceived you with the promise of of money of these two dunars. Because you became angry for that sake, I now have power over you. Look.

In this narration, what Iblis has done is he's told us as Muslims what the trick is. You know, if we do something for the sake of Allah, he's not gonna have power over us. Once he gets into our system, he does. The same way because it's just like serial killers, right, or or murderers. So they're what is it what is a trope of serial killer?

When they do something that's so, in their mind, so intelligent, they have to, like, goad the police into this sort of chase, and they have to be like, I need to get some credit for it. Someone has to know what I did. That's just like these people. After the Charlie Cook thing, you saw people on the left and right come together and be like, no. But look.

Talking is so important. We have to have this concept of, like, freedom of speech and and discussing ideas. And yet, it's just like sister Nisa was saying. They wanted to sound like it allows for facilitation of freedom of ideas and different sides. But when things happen, they show you that it's they're really just all on the same side, so there's not really any difference.

And when that's the case, when they don't have a metric of what is an actual fundamental truth to actually talk around, that's when all of this discussion doesn't go anywhere other than clamoring to hold on to something. And what they're holding on to now is the notion that First Amendment is what will, like, lead to the truth. But that's never really been what those debates have ever been about. If you've ever seen a Charlie Kirk debate, he knows that he does not he's not interested in actually getting to the truth. He's only interested in shutting people's conversation down by asking irrelevant questions and not letting them get to their point.

I'll I'll let others speak. I I don't know if that made much sense, but inshallah, somebody can elaborate on that.

Brother. Think brother Muhammad, I would just please let us keep it, you know, to what was being spoken about in this section inshallah before we go on to the next just so we keep it structured inshallah, please, Muhammad.

Well, thank you very much. As brother Hussaina said, it's this mentality of a kid. So think of anyone who's led by pride that you've ever had a discussion with in your life. When you confront them about what wrongdoings they're doing, one and first the first reaction you're going to get is going to be the slash out, this form of I can't do anything wrong. And this is where this artificial supremacy comes from.

It's this I don't I can't do anything wrong. What do you mean that I did something wrong? And then when you continue to confront them further, or when time shows the truth, they will then retract that statement and go, Okay, maybe I did something wrong, but someone forced me to do it, and so on and so forth. And so it's literally the same psychology of a child or in their own words, it's a narcissistic psychology.

Yeah. It it is. It really boils down to immaturity. Yeah. As you say, childish behavior, not owning up, blaming someone else.

And, of course, you know, Shaytan, we understand that reality. We will get to it. But just seeing it, basically, you know, you can assess. And it was yesterday, if you, you know, listeners and speakers, if you watched the stream, it's this immaturity really is somehow gets into every aspect of their life. Yeah?

Because, like, you cannot be an adult in some aspect and be immature completely in a different aspect. Right? Immaturity applies to all that you do. Alright? So we can see, for example, with the manosphere and the red pill, it's a very immature view of relationships, of marriages, of, you know, intimacy, of everything that is related to that sphere, very immature view.

Alright? In the video yesterday with the assassination, it was also the view that is presented by the deceased was a simplistic view, a very immature view that all the problems are due to immigrants. This blame shifting gets very immature. You know? If you cannot own up, you're a kid.

Right? You're childish, and I cannot take you seriously. Alright? So this is very something like, something very important to understand because then you, like, they are immature in this aspect, and then you go seek knowledge from these people. Like, how can I seek knowledge if you're, you know, immature in all of these aspects?

Like, you cannot be an adult, then how am I sure that you are telling me now something that can be believed, right, or is correct or comes from the correct understanding of reality itself. Right? So very interesting aspect because this isn't just related, you know, to past injustices, but it's how we approach them even now. Right? How we take information from them, how we assess information that is received.

Everything about them has to be understood as an immature and, of course, you know, jinn worshiping society. Right? So subhanAllah, please.

Okay. So, basically, when Charlie Kirk was killed, a bunch of comments came out that it was the Jews who had something to do with it because Netanyahu immediately tweeted after he died. So I still wonder, like, how is it this great so called, quote, unquote, great the greatest country in the world apparently is how is it so weak to be able to be infiltrated by a foreign power to be subjugated by foreign power to the point that people are killed willy nilly for the sake of, should I say, prove proving a point. So the argument they're trying to push was because Charlie Kirk had a little bit of just a little bit of an argument with a few Jews who were pissed that he invited non nonprovisually, shall I say, speakers on his show. So that was just the whole basis.

And I'm just trying to say that this is the Jews who did it. So it's funny. Like, it's funny. Like, why would they kill Charlie Kirk of all people? Like, he doesn't serve any purpose being dead for them.

He is like a mouthpiece for Israel. I don't see how that makes any sense, but it was either like you said, I think Uz mentioned it in the other section that was either they were so sad that they were trying to point push the blame on the governor was saying that we to which he wished it was someone else, someone not from the state. So it still goes down to the whole blame shifting and all, and the whole fact that, okay, it's either Jews or it's Muslims or it's leftist as if leftist are not from the American sphere of, should I say, ideology and whatever, basically.