End American impunity

If you remove that impunity from them, and they're forced to face the consequences of their actions, well, then their actions will be different. They're they're able to commit the acts that they're committing because they know that they'll never pay the price for it. They know that they'll never pay the consequences for it. They know that they'll never be held legally accountable for the crimes that they commit. So the moment that they know that they're gonna face consequences, well, choices will be different.

So it's not a question of, is The United States going to go rogue if they get kicked out of the United Nations. It's the fact that while they're in the United Nations and dominating the United Nations, they've been going rogue for seven decades. And the only way that we can prevent that, the only way that we can, halt that is by removing them from the United Nations. So they are purveyors of violence because it's money making for them. They have a profit motive for promoting violence and conflict all around the world, and that's what they've been doing, and that's what they were able to do because they were the largest disproportionately with no, with no near parallel, funder and financier of the United Nations.

Well, that's changing now. Now, other countries with the rise of BRICS, with again the rise of China, other countries are contributing a a greater percentage of the UN budget. And as I say, I think China is only what, five or 6% less than what the what The United States pays. So the removal again of The United States from the UN will just to sum up, they will begin finally after seven decades, they will finally begin to be held accountable for their actions, and they will have to face the consequences of their actions, And the United Nations will actually be able to function the way it's supposed to function. And we will see, inshallah, a greater spread of peace and security, real peace and security.

Because of course, what what they mean when America talks about peace and security, they mean their peace and the security of their interests, usually against the interest of the population. When they talk about security, for example, when they talk about security in Africa, they talk they're talking about securing the minerals of Africa for them against the potential sovereignty of those nations. And when they talk about peace, what they mean is, an end to any resistance to their domination. That's what they mean by peace. They mean the surrender and capitulation of local populations for them to be able to secure the resources of those nations.

So if if we are able to get The United States out and there's no reason why we can't, again, this is a legal procedure, this is something that they signed upon, this is something that they're signatories to, so there's no reason whatsoever why it can't happen, and they put that in the charter by the way, they put that in in the charter at a time when they thought that they would never have to live up to it. At a time when they were so much more the dominant power on earth, and again, the disproportionately largest funder of the UN, they put it on paper because they always want to look good without having to be good. So they put it on paper that they believe in this and that and those values, knowing that no one was ever gonna be able to hold them to account. Well, now we're in a position, Insha'Allah, to hold them to account, expelling The US from the United Nations is gonna be essentially like a slave revolt, a slave rebellion that overthrows the master, and the people can take the plantation for themselves.