Where Reverts Can Take The Lead

Okay. So in the last video I was talking specifically about American revert Muslims, convert Muslims, Americans who come to Islam. Some of what I said sort of applies to reverts or converts in the West generally, but I was talking specifically I had in mind American reverts. Some of it even applies to just Muslims in the West generally, but they're in a different position and different situation. And I was talking specifically in that video, although I I did talk a little bit at least by implication about the the role of American Muslims in America, American reverts in America.

But I was talking mostly about the role of American Muslims, American revert Muslims in the Ummah in relation to the broader Muslim world, in relation to what you can call the legacy Muslim countries. And and talking about how we don't have a leadership role there, we can't have a leadership role there, we don't have a supervisory role. We have a support role. We have a subordinate role. And that's as it should be.

By all rights, we can only have that kind of a role in someone else's country. Now, I don't even wanna like, some people I got I had some comments that were in my opinion sort of obtuse and taqua signaling, talking about how the whole world, you know, there is no Muslim land, there are there are lands and and it all belongs any Muslim belongs in any Muslim land and so forth. This is ignorant and your talk was signaling because the the we are spatial creatures, Yani. We live in time and space. And so there is a there is a reality of heritage.

And as I said, I can belong in any Muslim country, I can feel familiar in any Muslim country, but that country is not mine. Period. Mhmm. That's a fact. And you have to respect the people who are actually from that land.

Respect their the state that they have in that land that you don't have. So I was talking in that video about the subordinate role that we have, the support role that we have in the the broader Muslim world, in the legacy Muslim lands. And I didn't talk so much about the fact that we do have a a leadership role. Not in that regard. Not in regard to the Muslim countries.

Not in regard to the legacy Muslim lands. We don't have a leadership role there because we don't really have a right to. Because again, we don't have the same stake and we don't have the same history in those lands. But we have a leadership role or we should have a leadership role in America. What I I should explain what I mean, I guess, by leadership.

Or maybe I should explain what what it doesn't mean. I'm not saying, for example, that because you're American in America and you became a Muslim, now now you can be dismissive of immigrants, dismissive of Arab Muslims, Asian Muslims, African Muslims and so on, and what they have to say about Islam and so forth. No, that's not what I mean. Obviously, in in amongst ourselves, the most knowledgeable and the most biased is always going to be the most elevated in the community, no matter where they came from. So it's not about that.

It's not about taking a leadership role in terms of we don't have anything to learn from you. And you and and and now you have to learn from us. Obviously not, that's not what I mean. But what I mean is in terms of what our role should be in terms of engaging with America itself. Engaging with the broader American society, especially with the with the government, with the elite, with the power structure.

You can't it's not fair for you to expect Muslims from outside to engage with or to confront the American power structure. That's your job. They are they're already in especially now, the vulnerable situation as immigrants. They're already Okay. You have you have a few different, I won't say handicaps, but deficiencies, potential deficiencies in terms of expecting immigrant Muslims to confront or to engage with or to address the American power structure.

One is that they are Many of them will already have a colonized mentality. They will be psychologically colonized already. And they won't They'll be psychologically colonized already, or they will be ignorant about what the realities are in America. Not necessarily because they have a colonized mentality, but just because maybe they come from a society as most societies are in our parts of the world, in the Muslim parts of the world. They're used to people meaning what they say.

And so when when you hear all the rhetoric coming out of America, you you come from a background where you think that they mean it, and that therefore anything that they that that they might do that contradicts their rhetoric, well it's a mistake. They were misled, it's just an oops on their part. So you may not understand because you're trusting what we would call maybe naive or gullible, which is something that you should be allowed to be because people should keep their word and should mean what they say, but that and that's maybe what you're used to. So either they have a colonized mentality or they're ignorant about the reality of America and they they take America at its word. Or, they're simply scared to say anything, even if they don't have a colonized mentality and they know the reality.

But as immigrants, their situation is not as secure as yours, as an American citizen. Their situation is not as secure as yours, especially now as we know. They can get deported. They'll they'll be they have their own security and safety and stability concerns. So it's not for them to confront the American power structure.

That's your job. And that's where I see American revert, convert, Muslims. This is what your role should be and no one no one is better suited for that than you. And this is I I I was alluding to this and you should've you know, people should've been able to kind of read between the lines I guess, in my opinion. When I said that the Muqtar of American Reverse is Malcolm x.

Because he showed you what your role is in that country. He showed you what your job is. You're the you're supposed to be the security perimeter around the masjid. You're supposed to be the prosecutor of American crimes. That's your job.

You're the prosecutor. You're supposed to be the one who's exposing the crimes of The United States. You're the one who's supposed to be exposing the propaganda, the indoctrination, the false narratives, the false history. Because you're, you know, like I said in that video, you're supposed to be a witness. And as an American who was born and raised there, you witnessed everything, you know.

Just like in my lifetime, just in just in my lifetime, in fifty four years, America has been responsible for literally killing directly or indirectly millions upon millions of people, millions. Not hundreds, not thousands, millions of people. You know, I was born during the Vietnam war, grew up as a child in the during the dirty wars in Central And South America. Then you had the the first Iraq war. Then you had over a decade of sanctions against Iraq.

Then you had the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, followed by sanctions, economic warfare against say Venezuela, and you know, on and on. Iran obviously, and throughout my whole life, obviously, throughout my whole life, and throughout even my mother's life, you had America sponsoring, arming, funding the So Zionist occupation of we're witnesses to everything. There isn't a isn't a decade of my lifetime that isn't That doesn't have its own accompaniment of American violence, exploitation, savagery, brutality, and multiple crimes. You know? I can go in my life decade by decade and and list all of the the the crimes that characterized that decade of my life that America committed.

So as an American citizen, you know, you have you have enough of a job and you should know what your job is. And and no one should no one is in a position to do that job but you. Certainly not in a position to do it better than you, who is more suited for that job than you.

Do that as opposed to standing and staying there on your carpet and criticizing the Arab rulers and, you know

Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, this is the thing. You First of all, you know, had an I got an email from someone about that last video when I was talking about Malcolm X. And and because in that video I said that you won't find in the course of his lifetime Malcolm x participating in a protest or criticizing Muslim rulers abroad.

And he and and he said, Malcolm's whole life was a protest. I mean, okay. If you're gonna define it in that way. But he never participated in the sit in, he never participated in the march, and he eviscerated the tactics and the strategies of the civil rights movement at that time. And he was right.

I mean, he was right and he was wrong. Those things those things had a function. Those protests had a function. But you're never gonna see Malcolm x in a march. You're never gonna see him in a sit in.

He emphasized defense. Like I said in the video, he he emphasized defense, he did action. And he I and and he understood how power really works. And he understood that leverage is what power respects. Power doesn't respect you begging industry even if you're calling your begging demanding, making demands of the government.

What you're doing is begging. And he knew that if you're let me put it this way, if your protest, your marches, like I've said before, if they don't if you don't tag on to the end of your demand and or else, then you're doing nothing but big. And you can be easily ignored. But they teach you, I'm kind of going off the main subject here, but they they teach you that all of the civil rights achievements and the progress, if you wanna call it that, that was made in America over the course of the civil rights movement, they want to tell you, they want to teach you that that was all achieved by protests, by marches, by sit ins, by grassroots activism. When the reality is that it was achieved in the courts, not on the streets.

I mean, I've talked about it before. Thurgood Marshall, it should be it should be that he famously said, I was gonna say as Thurgood Marshall famously said, but it's famous to me. I don't know if most people know it. He said, words to this effect, all those people who who who walked in Montgomery, Alabama during the Montgomery bus boycott in the nineteen fifties. I don't know why all those people walked.

They didn't have to walk for a for a for a year. We were settling that issue in the supreme court and that's where the issue did get settled. And the the the Montgomery bus boycott is dubious if that had any impact whatsoever on the outcome in the in the supreme court. All of the the the this is this is another important thing, is that what they were marching for, what they were demonstrating for, what they were protesting for is the implementation of what had already been guaranteed to them legally. Those legal guarantees obviously were won through court cases.

Those legal guarantees were not achieved or were not granted to them by means of people protesting in the street. They were protesting in the street to have the implementation of what they were guaranteed by law. So if you don't have something guaranteed by law, what are the chances that you can change the law by your protest? Malcolm understood this. He understood where the real power lies, how how real power moves and what real power responds to, which is also why he made the case or he was in the prep in the process of making a case at the United Nations against America.

He was going through institutions, he was through his practical, his his approach was always practical and pragmatic. So, and then and then back to what you first Why why I even started this was talking about the the How how you're finding so many American Muslims, reverts and non reverts, mean born Muslims, immigrants and what not, children of immigrants in America, focusing all of their attention on criticizing the Muslim rulers, criticizing the Arabs, criticizing the Arab states and so forth. And and in a way almost putting all of the blame on them for what their own government is doing. When Malcolm X traveled in Africa and The Middle East, in the Arab world, in the Muslim world, he met with leaders who were controversial in their day, who had a great deal of descent, who maybe were viewed at one point as heroes, but by the time he met them, they were controversial and they had a lot of opposition like Nkrumah, like Nassar, Abdul Nassar in Egypt. But he didn't say a word against them.

He didn't take sides in the internal domestic dispute of Egypt, or Ghana, or anywhere else. And if he did talk about, for example in Congo, when he talked about Congo, he talked about what America was doing. He talked about what Belgium was doing. Kept the focus very very laser focus on the actual culprits, on the actual criminals which which was America and Belgium or Europe. So this is what your role is supposed to be and this is why it's important for you to understand that he's your muhtai.

Because he modeled and this is another thing I'll say. Some of the other comments that have gotten similar to the one about, well, a Muslim can live anywhere and they, you know, all the Muslim countries and so forth. Yeah. And and the the nation state obsession. I'll talk about that too.

But there's also people saying, our Muqtar is only Rasulullah Our role model is Rasulullah Okay. This is again, I'm sorry, obtuse, taqwa signaling because obviously. And saying that Malcolm X is our Muqtar does not negate the reality of Rasulullah being our role model. But if you're if you're going to take this position of our only role model or our only the the only one that we look to for leadership or for to to emulate or to listen to is Rasulullah then why do we have heads of state? You're acting like we don't even need to have rulers, we don't need to have heads of state, we don't need to have a Khalifa.

Whereas, the first thing that the Muslims did after Rasulullah died was try to find out who's gonna lead now. They didn't say, our ruler is still Rasulullah even in death. You still need someone to manage your affairs and to help you navigate the situation that you're in. The circumstances and the conditions that you're facing. Your your particular group of people who have who you know, who are in a who have a common experience, a common history, a common heritage, a common location.

Obviously, they need. And even if even Rasulullah said, we need an emir. Even if just a few of you are going out on the journey, you need to appoint someone as your emir. You don't say, no, I don't have an emir because only Rasulullah is my emir. This isn't Islamic.

You think that you're saying something to show that you're pious and you're just showing that you're goofy. You know? This is the the the the this is I I and I also know that whoever said that is western. I'm sorry, but I also know that when you say that you're western. Either you're either you're a revert, but most likely you're you're an immigrant who's living in the West.

And you're and you are now infected by the western simple mindedness. The western simple simplification and reduction, reductivism that the West always applies to everything. You know, like you can't say like like imagine if a child, if a father tells his child to take out the trash and he says, well Rasulullah didn't tell me to take out the trash and he's my only muhtar, so I'm not gonna do it baba. It's not gonna happen. Can can we have a serious conversation please?

You know? Don't be don't be foolish. So yeah, this you you have a leadership role. Every your role is always gonna be contextual. It's always gonna be within the context of where you are and what your situation is, what your role is supposed to be.

You know? And so your role vis a vis the the the broader Muslim world and the Muslim countries is a supportive subordinate role. Your role vis a vis the power structure in America, that's a leadership role. Your role is to refute, rebuke, and prosecute. That's your role Because no one should know more about it than you, and no one is in a better position to do it than you, and no one is no one has a greater responsibility to do it than you.

So that's where that's what your role should be, and that's what our taught us about what our role should be because that's what he did. I mean, I you know, this is the thing. You have to you have to like for for for Western Muslims, for American Muslims, reverts and also the children of immigrants who grew up Muslim but grew up in the West, grew up in America. You you have two problems. You have a colonized mentality.

You have a psych you're psychologically colonized, but you also have to you have to so you have to psychologically decolonize, but you also have to psychologically decolonarize because you also have a colonizer mentality, which is a contradiction. It's an oxymoron in a way. It's a paradox. You have a colonized and colonizer mentality at the same time, especially if you are an immigrant or from immigrant heritage. But if you're if you're a revert, you you definitely have some colonizer in your in your world view.

And it's not that's not your fault. You come from there. You grew up with this. And you have to purge yourself of of of that that world view, of of that way of thinking. And, you know, like I said in the last video, there has to be some humility involved.

But you also have to understand that there's an element of that that is an element in terms of when we're talking about having American Muslims Muslims in the West putting so much emphasis and so much focus on criticizing the Muslim rulers in the Muslim land. Having diaspora people in the diaspora criticize the main body where the Muslims are and the leaders where the Muslims are. There's a that you have to understand that there's an aspect of that that makes you complicit in the crimes of the country you're in. Because you're part of the blame shifting. And you should you should really examine what you're doing and why.

You should really examine that because you are afraid to openly criticize The United States as it deserves to be criticized. You are afraid and you feel insecure even as a citizen, to call out America for its crimes. Meanwhile, you're telling people in the Muslim world that they should do what you're afraid to do. While they have had the bombs dropped on them, the missiles shot at them, their lands occupied, they felt the the the the lash of American violence more than you ever have. But you're expecting them to to do what you're you're you're you're yourself are afraid to do in the in the the relative comparative comfort and safety inside of America.

So you are you are deflecting the responsibility. You're helping to cover up the the culpability. I mean, culpability is even too weak of a word because you America is responsible. Like I said, just in my lifetime. All around the world, millions if not tens of millions of people have been killed by The United States directly or indirectly.

This isn't like even even you'll see the language like like when you see most American or western Muslims criticizing what's happening, criticizing the genocide. They put the emphasis very squarely on Israel itself and on Zionism itself. They'll say a thing here and there about America's complicity. They'll say a thing here and there about America's collusion, you know, that America is, shares in responsibility for what their bombs for the for the people that their bombs are killing, that their bullets are shooting, you know. This you're white you're you're whitewashing America's actual responsibility and accountability for everything that's happening in Gaza.

Everything. It's not that they're just turning a blind eye to it. They are overseeing it. They're underwriting it. They're paying for it.

They're arming it. They are completely responsible for it. Completely responsible for it. It's not just that they're complicit. They're they're completely responsible for it.

I mean, the thing is the the the one of the problems is, and and we've talked about this in the in the discussion group many times. One of the problems is, in my opinion, that many of the Islamic organizations in the West, many of the Islamic organizations in America were founded by and are influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood. They are either the Muslim brotherhood or some other what you can call Islamisthood.

That meaning. Yeah. Right. Right.

And and this is where you really have to you you you have a miseducation. Generally speaking. You're gonna have a miseducation about America itself, but even as a Muslim, you have a miseducation about these groups. You have a reactionary you have a you have a reflex response to defend these groups and align yourself with these groups because America officially hates them. So you think that they must be right.

They must be good. And their, you know, their call is always Islamic and so forth. So you think that they might be good, but you're getting duped. You're being misled because these are whether they started that way or not, this is what they are now. They are colonizer organizations.

Functionally. Functionally, are colonizer organizations. Again, that doesn't mean that everyone who is involved in those organizations knows that and and and is cognizant of that fact and is consciously serving the West. But functionally, you're serving the West. Functionally, you're serving the neocons.

Functionally, you're serving the Zionist because you are trying to undermine the Muslim world. You're trying to undermine our government and you are pro revolution always. Regardless of outcome, you think that the only good thing is to rise up against the Muslim rulers. You think that that's a sign of piety because you have accepted this this notion of these Islamist groups that no Muslim government is Islamic, no Muslim government is even a Muslim government. And therefore, it should be torn down.

And that doesn't serve anybody but the the the the power structure of the country that you're living in, that you're afraid to criticize. You're afraid to criticize the power structure that's responsible for, as I say, tens of millions of deaths, tens of millions of innocent people dying all around the world. You're you're you're afraid to criticize that government, that power structure, but you're eager to criticize the power structures that are the victims of that power structure. You wanna criticize the governments that are the victims of that power structure that you won't say a word against because it might interfere with your comfort and your security. So yeah, this is this is absolutely wrong.

And this is the the again, colonizer mentality that you have you're being manipulated. Your your love for Islam and your your commitment to Islam and to Sharia is being manipulated by these groups. And and you know, this also brings me back to the thing about nation states. Because I had a comment and then that same person who commented actually came into the telegram chat to say that I think that I think that that that that it was partly a reaction to taking offense at the idea that reverts can't have a leadership position because of the, you know, the main character syndrome that I even talked about in that video that it might trigger that main character syndrome. And you you you need to be able to lead, you need to be able to supervise, you need to be able to be the one that everybody listens to and obeys because that's what you were raised on, but that's what your country always gets to do.

So you you you you record at the idea that you have to be subordinate and supportive of your brothers and sisters in the Muslim world. So his suggestion was that this will no longer be the case when the nation states collapse. When the nation state model collapses, then any Muslim anywhere, you know, your passport is and now we're all the same, you know. Okay. This is delusional and it's a historical and even the whole obsession about the evils and the destructiveness of nation states is a historical and it's a big waste of time to talk about this.

Because we have always had the Muslim the Muslim world has always been divided up into provinces. It's always been divided up into different jurisdictions. And there's always been a leadership and a power structure within those. No borders. No Exactly.

Boundaries Exactly. Even within within the so called Muslim empire, you have to get paperwork to go from one area to another. This isn't a new phenomenon. And then the fact that, you know, like like I said in the chat, even if the so called nation state model were to collapse, and then you have a a a, you know, like basically borderless travel and citizenship rights across all of the Muslim world. Even if that existed.

A Muslim in New Jersey doesn't get to lead Brunei. You know, like I said, we live in time and space. The people of an area are always gonna know more about that area and be more qualified to rule and lead in that area than you.

Have some sense.

Yeah. Have some sense. Really? Yeah. Like like I said in that video and I've said it before.

If we take you at your word about the Jewish control, then you should accept Muslim rule because they never ran us. They never controlled our empire. We never had a problem with them. So if you don't seem to be able to handle them, if they're overcoming you and overpowering you and manipulating you and tricking you all the time continuously forever, then okay, let us handle it. You should abdicate and put Muslims in charge, and your problem will be solved.

This brings me back this this point now raises the the the video that I showed you the other time that I that irked me to know. And there's a woman talking about how there was some Jewish spy with a and undermined Islam from within

Right.

Confirmed by another Jew scholar.

Right. Right.

They did eventually undermine this because you wanna you wanna dismiss.

Yeah.

There's a CDU that seeks to dismiss even Muslim rule. Yeah. You know, because even though Okay.

It's not it's not only that. It's not only that. This isn't this is Okay. This part of part of that is they're they're trying to, you know, blame shift and put everything on the Jews. That's one of the things.

They wanna try and uphold, you know, the Nazi mythology about the the unique evil

Right.

And and and controlling abilities. They're almost hypnotic apparently power that the Jews have to get anybody to do their bidding. They were not they they've been westernized and they have accepted either they're either they're just lying or they really believe this. But the other thing that's that's even worse than that, in my opinion, and this again goes back to the Muslim motherhood and all of the Islamist groups. Because their whole narrative is based on us accepting that we are completely broken.

That our ummah is completely broken. That the Muslims are completely broken. That Islam has been completely sabotaged and subjugated. They need us to believe that the West that first The UK, France, you know, the previous former colonial powers and then America, they want you to believe, they need you to believe, their narrative requires you to believe that those countries were powerful enough to destroy Islam and to destroy the ummah. That's nothing but a a declaration of western power.

That's your narrative. Your narrative is about western power. Your narrative is a western supremacist narrative. You are upholding that. You're upholding western supremacy, white supremacy, and Muslim inferiority.

Arab inferiority, African inferiority, Asian inferiority. You are upholding that when you make that argument. Never mind that it's not even true. Never mind that it's not even true. You know?

Just like just like we're talking about it. Again, it's we're talking about the nation states. If you look at at any African country, the narrative is always the the the colonizers drew the borders, like say Nigeria. The colonizers drew the borders. So Nigeria is a a fake nation state and so forth.

But you don't know you don't understand anything about the country. And I'm not saying that I have any particular insight about Nigeria specifically. But I know enough to know that it's still run primarily through tribal dynamics. They're the same way they ever been in terms of the the actual sort of structure and hierarchy and the system of management in the society, social management. That's still according to the way it's always been.

It doesn't matter that the the the borders are here or here or here. I mean, if you think about it that way, the the okay, like, because one of the complaints that people have about nation states, one of the complaints that has some validity to it is the idea that you have now put together people into one nation state that aren't from the same nation. You know, like say you have you know, people of people of one tribe or one clan are now mixed with people of another tribe and another clan, whereas historically they would have been considered two different territories. Now you put them all together and this creates clashes. Okay.

That's maybe something you can say. And then also, you've divided clans right down the middle because one of them is Somali, one of them is Eritrean say for example, or Eritrean Ethiopian Djibouti whatever. You you've divided tribes. Okay. There's some degree of truth in that.

But that same thing applies to The United States Of America. Because like when you talk We were talking earlier about whether America does or does not have a culture. And what actually even constitutes a culture. But put that argument aside about whether America has a culture or not. Let's assume that there's culture in America.

Okay. But which culture? The culture of the South? The culture of the North? The culture out West?

The culture of the Mid West? The culture of the Northwest? The culture of of say the Dakotas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, that's extremely different than than Mississippi. It's very different from Louisiana. There's a whole there's Creole culture, you know what I mean?

There's then then you have within that the the the so called ethnic and racial groups. You have African American culture and then you have even an African American culture of the South versus say California, versus say New York. These these are all different cultures. So you have multiple cultures all mixed together in one country calling it all one nation. When if you were to go by what we understand the culture to be, that should be several different nations.

Not just states, there should be several different nations within that country. So they they have the same problem. It's it's not really a valid argument. It's not an important thing. People can get along and not get along.

And and and people are still gonna the nation state model has not prevented people from still operating the same way they always operated. And in fact, the the the destruction of the or the dismantling or the suspension of the Khilafa did not impact most of the Muslim populations in the world the way that you people think it did. People are still Muslim, they still follow Islam, they still pray, they still fast, they still wear hijab, and and the West like I said before, what the West, what the entirety of western colonization has been able to do to the was nothing but a flesh wound. It's just a flesh wound. It wasn't lethal.

It wasn't a mortal injury. And over the course of time, we'll see that it it just an irritation what you did. But the but the Islamist want you to believe and this is why this is how you can understand that they are essentially colonizer institutions, colonizer organizations. Because if you really look beneath and inside their arguments, they are absolutely upholding western supremacy. Because like I said before, they want you to believe that they had the power to destroy our ummah.

They had the power to destroy Islam.

Yeah. This is

They did not. They absolutely did not. So the the the the situation in any individual Muslim country is their business. That's their business. There's no reason for you to talk about it.

There's no reason for an American Muslim to talk about what's going on in Egypt or Saudi Arabia or Brunei or Indonesia or Malaysia or anywhere else. Especially if you haven't even been there, if you don't even if you don't live there and you haven't even been there, you have no business talking about it because first of all, you don't even know what you're talking about. Your whole understanding of that situation is based upon, I'm sorry, most likely Islamist propaganda and western media, which is which mean which is another way of saying that you have no reliable source of information about that country, about the situation in that country. But you're feeling free to talk about it and that's your westernization. That's your that's your western colonizer mentality that you have to try to purge yourself of.

That you actually think that you are that you are an expert on something you know nothing about just because you're western, just because you're american. And you don't even need to try to understand the complexity of other countries and other peoples and other societies. You don't even think you need to learn about that because that's the that's the way the colonizers thought. The only thing that you understand according to your colonizer mentality is that you know best and they should listen to you. Yep.

And that's the approach that we hear all the time from people talking about Muslims in the West reverts and and and and any Muslim in the West. This is what they sound like. And you also should understand that exactly zero people listen to you who matter. Exactly zero people listen to you in in the country that you're talking about. No one respects what you're saying.

Because the first thing that they know is, you don't know what you're talking about. You're an outsider. There's no reason to listen to you. So nobody does. Meanwhile, you keep talking.

But you're only talking to each other. So you're falling now into the same pattern that the West right now, that America right now is in. Which is that you keep talking only to each other because nobody else in the world is listening to you. No one in the world is listening to you anymore. We used to have to listen to you because you had a gun to our head.

But now we know that that gun is empty. So even if you're still holding the gun to our head, you just make yourself look like a fool because of how stupid you think we are. If you're treating someone who's smarter than you as stupid, all you all all that smart person learns from that is the extent of your own stupidity, the extent of your own foolishness. So you should respect yourself enough not to be like that. So what's going on in any Muslim country is their business.

They have a right to talk about it, they have a right to act upon it, they have a right to do whatever they think that they need to do because they understand their situation better than you. And what you should be focusing on is where you are. And believe me, you have enough to focus on. You're at the you're at the at the command center. You're living in the command center of global tyranny, global violence, global exploitation, you know, global pillage, global oppression.

You're at the command center. Don't you have enough to talk about? Where you are? About where you are? You wanna talk about Sisi?

You wanna talk about Mohammed bin Salman? You wanna talk about Mohammed bin Zaid? What have you? Why don't you talk about Trump? Talk about Trump.

Talk about Biden. Talk about Obama. Take your pick. Yeah. You know?

Talk about your companies. Yeah. Talk about your corporations. Talk about what your country is doing and call them out on all of it. That's your role.

Like I said before, you were raised in Pharaoh's palace. Just like what I said about myself and it's about Malcolm and it's about all of us. You were raised in Pharaoh's palace like Nabi Musa Alaihi Salam. What did Nabi Musa do? He went to Pharaoh's palace and told Pharaoh who he is and told him what he's doing and called him out right in his own palace.

That's what you're supposed to be doing.