Single Mothers don't "feminize" boys -- quite the opposite

Most of what passes for data and research from Rola Tomasi, you could sort of label it as, well, it makes sense to me type of data. And I'll give you an example of that. He and, a lot of people in the manosphere blame what they call the feminization of men in the West on an epidemic of single motherhood. That there's a whole generation or now a couple of generations of boys that were raised by women. They were raised by single mothers, aunties, grandmas, that kind of thing.

And the theory is that this has made men effeminate. It's made them beta. It's made them blue pilled. It's made them male feminists. That's what you call, well, it makes sense to me.

Because, well, if a boy is raised by a woman and he doesn't have a male role model, then he's going to tend to, you know, imitate his mother and take on his mother's traits and his mother's qualities. That's gonna make him effeminate. K? That's it makes sense to me in my head because the reality is quite different. A boy who is raised by a single mother is much more likely to be a violent predatory alpha male criminal.

That's what the statistics actually show. That's what the data actually shows, that the overwhelming majority of people who are imprisoned in The United States today for violent crimes were raised by single mothers. Not beta by any stretch of the imagination. Not effeminate by any stretch of the imagination. Violent, domineering, dominating, powerful, dangerous men.

So what that tells you is that when a boy is raised by a man, he learns how to be a man. And when a boy is raised by a woman, he turns out to be a man who doesn't know what to do with the power of a man. So in Rolo Tomasi's paradigm, fathers make their sons beta. In other words, fathers make their sons decent, responsible, disciplined. Fathers teach their sons how to be men.

If they're raised by single mothers, they become men, but they don't know how to be men because a woman cannot teach a boy how to be a man. So what we learn is that the absence of a father is obviously incredibly detrimental to a boy. It's incredibly detrimental to a son or a daughter. The statistics all show that. But in terms of whether or not he's gonna be effeminate, that would be a much better outcome than what the outcome actually is, which is that he grows up to be a very dangerous man, that it takes a man to raise a man.

And if he's raised by a woman, he may turn out to be a menace to society. So that's another example yet again of the red pill theory and completely misunderstanding the role of a father, which is to teach his son how to be a man, how to be disciplined, how to be be mature, how to be. Because if he's raised by a woman, he's not gonna be more sensitive and more kind and more gentle and more soft. He's gonna be harder and meaner and more predatory.