Livestream Excerpt: Western confusion & navigating hostile powers

You can't find an American who isn't, quote unquote, traumatized, even though nothing maybe serious has ever happened to them in life. But they're traumatized psychologically, mentally, intellectually because they've been subjected to, propaganda and lies. They've been lied to by every single authority, every single person in authority, every single person whose job it is from your childhood, including your parents, from your childhood to adulthood, every single person who's supposed to be telling you about life, who's telling you about reality, telling you about your role in the world and so on, every single one of those people, every single one of those authorities, every single one of those institutions has lied to them and nothing but lied to them. So this has caused tremendous cognitive dissonance, tremendous psychological, mental, intellectual thought process trauma that then you can't get past it. Even if you know this is a good person, this is a good, decent hearted person, they're a well intentioned purpose person Mhmm.

Moral person, or they're trying to be, and and and you want to have a normal conversation with them, you immediately, get sucked into this vortex of their trauma that you that you, you know, like, it's like it's it's like it looks looks way better from a distance. These people look they're they're way better from a distance because when you actually get get down to trying to talk to them, you realize the the extent of the confusion of all the different competing ideologies within the within because, like, within the pro pro Palestinian, say, the pro Palestinian factions within The United States, that's generally falling on the liberal side. And that's a mess when you get

when you if someone

is When

extracting them

Yeah. Because there's yeah. There's so many. It's it's an absolute quagmire of nonsense that that, you know, it's like like trying to walk through a swamp with your boots on. Every step, it sucks you down.

Mhmm. The leader of Ansar Allah has warned KSA against, quote, a US threat that is making them take foolish and reckless steps. Are his comments merited or simply political maneuver?

If they were completely under the control of Iran, which is questionable, they're an autonomous group. They get support from Iran, sure, but the extent to which they're actually under the control of Iran is questionable. But if they were completely under the control of Iran, I would actually feel better that they would not do anything hard rash, that they wouldn't do anything without thinking about the ramifications of it for the for the overall regional project. But when they when they start talking about I mean, if you're gonna start talking about threatening Saudi Arabia, you are already yourself falling for an American trap because you you need to be united. You need to be working in a in a in a in a way of solidarity and coordination, which you've been doing, you know, for for months now.

You've been doing it. There's been coordination between Riyadh and the Houthis and Iran and Hezbollah and Hamas, whether anyone likes to believe it or not, and and all of the BRICS countries. So if you're talking now about some some sort of threat against Saudi Arabia, then you're the one who's falling for an American trap because that's exactly what they want to see happen. You don't wanna you don't need to give I mean, after they just had a a a the Houthis just did a drone strike in Tel Aviv

Mhmm.

Against or or either against the US embassy or just nearby the US embassy. Yeah. Don't give the don't put more pressure on the Saudis than they can bear with regards to the pressure that they will be under to do something about you. Yeah. That you don't don't go too far now.

You have to get this has to be done in a reasonable measured way to where the Saudis can continue to intervene on your behalf to make sure that they don't have to come after you. But if you but the this the if you're gonna do provocative actions that's gonna put more pressure on the Saudis, then you're the one who's falling for for an American trap. The ruling was, you know, that that that that it is apartheid and that the occupation is illegal.

Illegal. Yes. Clear as day. Number two, our country is emboldened by the ICJ rulings to ruling today to call Israel an apartheid state and pandemic. Shouldn't every international organization now start economic and cultural cultural sanctions against

Yeah. Well, they they have they have provided the they have provided the the framework for that. They provided the groundwork for that. They provided they provided you with reason why if you were hesitant about it or nervous about it, you should realize this is not controversial anymore?

Anymore. Yeah. It's solid. Yeah. No one can blame you.

No one can say that you're some

kind of a radical because you say it's an apartheid regime. Yeah. That's the official position of international law.

Yep. Integral awareness.

So if you so if you don't think that that's the case, then you're radical. If you if you don't think if you disagree with international law, if you disagree with the ICJ, you're the one who's radical. The pivot to the global South is something that as that that the OCGFC have been driving, and they're not trying to avoid it. And the, you know, the pivot away from the West isn't something that's, like, ambushing the West and that, you know, this is the the rise of the global South against the will of the West and so forth. No.

It's the OCGFC that have been driving it. But they want to manage it in a certain kind of way, and they have their own vision of how they want it to go and how they want it to end up and what they want the world to look like at the end of that transition. And I think that they they are facing some real world challenges about that. And because they are business people, not ideologues, they will take the deal that they can get.

Yeah. That gives them the They're not ensures their profits.

Yeah. It it they just have they have to deal with the real world. This is the thing about business people. They have to deal with the real world. This is why I'm seemingly paradoxically not against strategic partnerships with things like BlackRock.

And why, like, in Malaysia, this deal for that that will it's really they're they're I think that they're they're first of all, they're exaggerating the importance of BlackRock's role in this deal with the airport managing of the airports.

Just for context, yeah, about the Malaysia.

Yeah. Yeah. There's a there's a deal a potential deal where Malaysian airports will be the the ownership will shares of the ownership will go to a consortium, a a foreign consortium, which is includes both UAE, I think. Abu Dhabi. Mhmm.

Abu Dhabi and another fund that is going to be, I think, not even now, but going to be bought by BlackRock. So then there's a so there's a lot of sort of panic and and anger in Malaysia about that because has gotten a very bad reputation in Malaysia, and people have become very aware of BlackRock. So they're like, well, we don't want our airports to be controlled by BlackRock. Obviously, that's not the way it would actually work. Mhmm.

BlackRock's not gonna control the airports. That's that's what I mean by it's it's an exaggeration. But I think that it's very important to understand that the OCGFC are extremely powerful. Yeah. And to understand what they want and what they'll be satisfied with if they can't get the maximum of what they want.

And so you have to kind of give them a cut in order to hold them at bay. You have to make some kind of a partnership with them so that they have a vested interest in your success rather than it being in their interest to just come in and devastate you. Yeah. Because they have the ability to do that.

Exactly. This is the reality that we need to understand. You know, it's not some dramatic.

Yeah. No. This is I mean

of independence.

Yeah. I mean, if again, this is like the like the video yesterday. If I have to explain this to you, then you don't need to even discuss these issues. You know, you you have to get yourself up to speed. If I have to explain to you actually about how how investment works, and I've if I have to explain to you that the people the owners and controllers of global financialized capital also happen to be the people who control the armies Mhmm. Like,

for example, when when the brother was asking about military bases Yeah. In in in all of these different parts of the world, are they gonna see them kicked out or not? The military bases are there for business purposes. To

ensure their

business So so if the business interests are gone, the military will go. The the the don't put the the the the cart before the horse. The the getting the military out is, first of all, not even the point. That's not actually what shows the control and the domination by the West isn't their military presence.

Mhmm.

It's why the military presence is there in the first place, which is that they have an interest in your country, a business, financial, economic interest in your country that they're trying to protect. Meaning, the interest that they have in your country has been secured already, and they need to secure it further by their military presence. So if you're like like with bin Salman making a partnership with BlackRock UAE making partnerships with BlackRock, Malaysia making potential partnerships with BlackRock. To me, this is very strategic and very tactical. It's very clever.

It's very cunning. It's very savvy. Understanding the threat that these people pose, that you have to try to hold them at bay. You have to try to satisfy them because you can't make them go away. You can't pretend that they don't exist.

You can't just put your head in the sand and pretend that BlackRock's not gonna come around, that the OCGFC aren't gonna come around if you just, you know Yeah. I won't have anything to do with you. Therefore, I'm safe from you. It it doesn't work like that. That's exactly what makes you unsafe.

Yeah. You make yourself open to vul your vulnerabilities

Yeah.

By by doing so.

They you you they can't treat you in a hostile manner when you're partners. They they have an interest in your success and your stability and your safety if you've shown that you're willing to do business with them. And if you're not willing to do business with them, then they will be hostile with you and then they will dictate all the terms. They're not gonna the the it's not like they will just lose interest with you. It's not like they're gonna knock the door, knock on your door, and if you don't answer, they'll go away.

They'll burn the house down, you know. But if you if they knock on the door and you answer the door, you invite them in and have tea or what have you, and then they will know that you're not hostile. Mhmm. And then they'll know, oh, okay. Okay.

We can deal with these people like this in a civil manner. But if we push too much, then we won't get what we want. I'm talking about like BlackRock. If we push too much, if we're too hostile, then it's gonna it must escalate.

Yeah.

So the Muslim way of doing things is to always try to avoid escalation. Yeah. We want to avoid escalation. We want harmony and and and decent civil dealings with people. So okay.

I understand. You're a rich, greedy bastard, and you want access to my resources. I understand that. And I also understand that if I completely shut you out, then you're gonna bring an army. So it's like when offered to in in the in the the the Trenches.

Trench battle, the battle

of the trench. When the the Arab tribes had gathered against the Muslims in Medina Mhmm. And they were besieged

Yeah. That suggested

offering some of the tribes a share of their crops, basically to buy them off, to make them go away. Meaning, they didn't end up doing it, but meaning that such a such an idea is a good idea and it's strategy and it's halal and it's allowed to do. Mhmm. Because it would secure the the the the safety of the Muslims by giving them a share. Because if you don't give them a share, then you're gonna be in a hostile confrontational situation where you might end up losing everything.

Yeah. Which, again, I wanna

By giving them a share, you secure the rest.

Yeah.