America's Corruption of the UN

With with regards to what was just being said now and you as you started to say, a lot of people are unsatisfied with the way the United Nations has operated, and so are we, and so have we been, which is why we thought we should try to look at why that would be the case, why it's not operating properly, why it has been so unsuccessful, why it has become so impotent as a as a world body. And it was fairly easy to identify what the source of the problem is what the source of the problem is. And obviously, that is The United States and The United States domination of the UN, which is exactly why we have launched this campaign. The impetus for it, of course, was the genocide in Gaza. But when we when when you do a comprehensive review of the history, global history, international history, the history of American interventions and covert operations and so forth around the world over the last seven decades or nearly eight decades.

I mean, you can you can go further back than that obviously. But if you're just looking at from the time of the establishment of the United Nations, well, you can see very clearly why the United Nations has been ineffective. Because if you think about if you think about that, if you think about just just the question, just the pondering, or just the accusation that the United Nations is ineffective, you you you can't help but draw the conclusion that that's by calculation, that that's by design because it's impossible for a 193 countries in the world to come together and to consistently at the general assembly reach a global consensus. I mean, we don't have everybody having all different types of views. There's there's always a consensus at the general assembly, and yet somehow it's never able to actually enforce what they say and what they decide and what their judgment is and what the consensus is, what the global consensus is.

Well, we all know why that's the case. And that's again why we've launched this campaign because we look at it again over the last seven to eight decades of American crimes internationally. And as I said earlier, the crimes committed by The United States against their own people, well, needs to stop. And there's a mechanism for stopping it. The United Nations is supposed to be the mechanism for stopping it.

The United Nations is supposed to be the instrument for the implementation of international law and the stabilization of peace and security in the world. That's what they're supposed to do. There is there is a there is an instrument for achieving that. There is a is an instrument for stopping American crimes. And the thing that's preventing it from doing its job is the fact that the one who is who who is committing the most crimes also is sitting in charge of the United Nations.

It's not it's not rocket science to figure out why the why that organization doesn't work. It's not because it's a bad organization. It's because it's a corrupted organization by one particular corrupting power. But I wanted to go back to talking about the the funding issue. I was starting to say that the United Nations, if they were to lose the 20%, 22% funding that they get from The United States, you would end up within a very short period of time seeing the United Nations having even more money than they have with that 22% funding by The United States.

They would end up having more money in their budget. Because now with the 22% that The United States chips in, it's nothing but bribe money, it's nothing but hush money. They're they're with with the funding that The United States is providing, the United Nations is barely able to, to to make ends meet, and is barely able to, function in all of the various conflict zones around the world. We'll look at some of the conflict zones where they have, for example, where they have peacekeeping forces. Forces.

Some of the major ones are, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Democratic Republic Of Congo, Lebanon, Sudan and South Sudan, actually, Syria, West Sahara, obviously, Israel Palestine, Kosovo, and India Pakistan. Well, every single one of those places are places where The United States themselves have had a hand in creating and prolonging, continuing those conflicts. The United States has actively either, instigated or is actively continuing those conflicts. So if you got if you got The United States out of the UN and the UN could actually do their job, what I'm saying is that when UN peacekeepers go over to these conflict zones that The United States themselves created and The United States themselves are continuing, perpetuating, these conflicts that The United States is perpetuating, well, obviously, the United Nations doesn't go over there to solve the conflict. Everyone knows that because they're going over there, they're going over there to to, intervene, so called intervene in a conflict that their boss started.

They're not going over there to solve the problem, but you have to send people over there. You have to send troops over there. You have to fund all of that. There's a budget for all of that. And and mostly what they do is participate in in perpetuating those conflicts.

Not to mention the fact that in almost every single one of those countries that I mentioned, UN so called peacekeeping forces, have been, have had accusations and allegations made against them for committing serious crimes themselves. Human trafficking, sex sexual abuse, sex sex trafficking, kidnapping, so on and so on and so on. The The United States has turned the United Nations into a kind of a criminal syndicate. So if you got The United States out of the United Nations, then the UN wouldn't have to continue perpetuating America's conflicts for them anymore. They wouldn't have to continue sending all of these troops.

Almost every single one of those, conflict zones that I mentioned that the United Nations is busy with right now, almost any of those conflicts and all of those conflicts could be resolved by the United Nations if the United Nations was able to do the job of solving conflicts and resolving conflicts rather than perpetuating America's conflicts. That's what they do because they're dominated by The United States. So if you got the the the The US out of the UN and you're worried about losing that hush money and you're worried about losing that bribe money, that extortion money that America pays and you you call it funding for the UN, if they lost that money, they would end up having more money because there would be fewer conflicts in the world because America wouldn't be able to exploit the United Nations as just a a device for creating markets for their military industrial complex. So don't worry about the money. The the the UN is gonna be fine in terms of its budget because they'll have much less work to do because they're working very hard right now for their boss to make sure that they can continue, funneling money into the military industrial complex of the United States.