The Epstein Frenzy: How the West Lost Its Mind - Shahid Bolsen

Well, I didn't particularly wanna talk about this again, to be honest. But the mania, you know, the absolute mania and the as brother is hot in the middle nation discussion group said, the narrative hysteria that's absolutely spiraling out online over this whole Jeffrey Epstein business is really quite stunning. It's it's quite stunning to watch. And it's revealing a great deal about the the the total collapse of critical thinking critical thinking skills among a significant segment of the online population, including Muslims. And it's very informative and it's very demonstrative about the cultural primitivity of the West as I've talked about many times.

You know, the immaturity of the West. Not to mention their own appetite for the the the darkest and most bizarre fantasies. And I find it quite fascinating and disturbing to consider where all of this might go. Because, look, what we're seeing what we're seeing more than anything else, really, with regards to Epstein, is a great deal of extrapolation and interpretive speculation about what's what's really meant, right, behind the languages and the references in what are otherwise completely mundane emails, if you actually go through it. And most of what you're seeing people share, you know, is like a screenshot of a message that on its own would not cause any alarm whatsoever on its own.

But they couch the screenshot in a sort of sensationalist, you know, salacious narrative about what they think that message means, about what it implies, you know. It's like when the when the headline is when the headline tells a different story than the article that's under the headline. So this short circuits your thinking processes. Now you read with, like, a pre implanted interpretation, an interpretation that is not reasonably supported whatsoever by the actual message content or the email content or whatever the case may be. Like, for example, this is this is the one of the most unbelievable ones.

There's there's one that's going around now. People are saying that Epstein said, that the flesh of infants tastes like cream cheese. Okay? This completely demented thing that people are sharing is literally based on an email where Jeffrey Epstein is telling someone that he wants vegetable cream cheese. And they're they're supposed to try and get it for him. And

he says that there are millions of babies, but very little good vegetable cream cheese. How do you go from that to cannibalism? I don't understand. How do you how do you make that leap? The actual offensive thing that he's saying is that good vegetable cream cheese is more valuable than babies because of, you know, of comparative scarcity.

It's a sick joke. No more, no less. And this is obvious. Okay. So where does this go?

If people accept that twisted humor, sick jokes, poor taste, what have you, like say, Bill Burr, for example, talking about mass population extermination, you know, or being tempted to drive his car into a crowd of people, you know, when he's talking in his stand up. In this in in this type of humor in private correspondence, if if we allow that to counted now as evidence of actual crimes and proof of utterly heinous acts, you know, for people that we have have decided that they are bad people, and now we can go through people's emails, their text messages, and so on, and we can extrapolate criminality from messages that do not, in any way whatsoever, relate to any actual crimes. Okay. So where does that take you? How are you gonna conduct yourself in your private correspondence now?

Your private messages, your personal messages, your personal communications. No humor, no nuance, no casual or flippant remarks anymore between you and even your friends and colleagues and acquaintances. You can't say anything that could conceivably be susceptible to malicious misinterpretation at some point in the future, because that's where this goes. You might wanna consider that. You might wanna consider what you're spiraling into.

Anything that you ever say to anyone has to be ironclad against being willfully misconstrued. No jokes of questionable taste, even with people that you're close to. No venting, you know, no just letting off steam in an email to a friend. No dubious language at all. You have to write to your friends and write to your family and write to your acquaintances fully anticipating how that's gonna sound if it's read back to you in a deposition.

Do you understand how destructive that's gonna be or how destructive that is to communication, to relationship building, to honesty, to trust? Like, again, there's an email exchange between Epstein and a Emirati woman, a diplomat or something, where she was gonna meet with him with another woman. Her and another woman were gonna meet with him about something, and Epstein is asking that if the two women can come earlier than scheduled. Does he he asked he asked the Emirati woman. She says something like, oh, you know how hard it is to get one girl ready.

What about two? Okay? Clearly referring to herself and to the other woman and making a joke about how long it takes girls to get ready. It's completely mundane. It's a completely mundane and innocuous joke.

It's something that we've all heard in one form or another thousands of times before. But online, in the in the context of Epstein, no. Online, this becomes Emirati woman prepares minor girls for Epstein. I mean, you serious? Are you actually serious?

And see, I said that you're gonna have to watch what you say in your private communications because it might end up in a trial or something or in a deposition or what have you or a trial by the court of public opinion. But you'll say no. I don't have anything to worry about. I don't have to worry about that because I'm not a criminal. I'm not a I'm not someone like Jeffrey Epstein.

Sure. Okay. Fine. You're not someone like Jeffrey Epstein. But how do you know that your name isn't gonna be connected to someone who is?

Who is like that? How do you know that every single person that you ever interact with is completely on the up and up? Especially in your society. Like this Emirati woman. Okay?

Do you know how many people a a diplomat interacts with? How many people they correspond with? How many people they meet? A diplomat's whole career is socializing, is networking, is interacting. This is what she does.

This is what diplomats do. What are you talking about? How do you think that that that this this guilt by association that you people are conducting? How do you feel safe that it's not gonna be applied to you? I mean, what if you're a family member, for example?

What if your family member works for, I don't know, Boeing? Working on complex aerospace systems, defense systems, and whatnot, deeply embedded in the military industrial complex. Well, how many corrupt and immoral people do you think that they might have in their inbox that they correspond with on a regular basis? People who themselves might be connected to or who might be themselves just like Jeffrey Epstein. Right?

And your family member's name now maybe shows up in their emails. And their messages back and forth between that person and your family member. Their messages back and forth get misconstrued, get misinterpreted. People think they're speaking in code or what have you. Oh, you went fishing?

He went fishing with the with the the VP of engineering and that VP is in charge of a multi billion dollar project and what have you. And that VP was caught doing doing disgusting things or has disgusting things on his laptop. Phishing, We all know what that means. You went fishing, This is how it works. This is how smearing works.

That's why it's called a smear because it's not precise. It just spreads indiscriminately over everybody, everything. And like, again, with Epstein, in the case of that Emirati woman, that diplomat, okay, once you get them to acknowledge, these people who are who are, you know, doing the smearing, once you get them to acknowledge that that message didn't say what they said that it was saying, then they'll jump to, well, she should not have been meeting him in the first place. So that's already suspect. That she shouldn't have been meeting him in the first place because he's a convicted sex offender.

Okay. That happened in 2008, whatever. Right? And the correspondence is after 2008. So there's no way she didn't know.

There's no way at all that she couldn't have known that. Okay. First of all, it's obvious now that you're actually just on a campaign to smear and to defame people. Now you just wanna come up with reasons to attack this woman, why it's okay for you to attack this woman. And it could be her or any number of other people that are being attacked.

So that's first of all. First of all, your insistence on attacking, finding reasons to attack discredits you. And your refusal to admit that you either misunderstood or deliberately misconstrued the original message, your your refusal to admit that also discredits you. You're not a fair person. But okay.

Epstein was convicted in, 2008, in Florida. And you imagine that everyone in the world, everyone internationally is supposed to know about a a Florida court decision. This is foolish. Did you know about it? Did you know about it in 2008, in 2010, 2013, 2018?

Or did you even know about it at all before you watched an Epstein documentary after the man was dead? Why would you imagine that anyone globally would know that? Why do you think anyone would know that? The records of sex offenders didn't show up at border control until after 2016. It is actually entirely possible that people outside The United States, even people inside The United States, but certainly people globally, it is entirely possible that people did not know about his conviction.

That's completely believable. What they knew is that he's a billionaire. He's a billionaire. He's a financier. He's an investor.

He's a donor. He's someone with a lot of contacts, he's someone with a lot of significant other people who vouch for him. That's what that's what most people would know about him. You tell us to deal with this guy, okay, he's your guy, we'll deal with him. And in The UAE, we know that he had a friendship with Sultan bin Salim, the head of DP World.

So Sultan bin Salim would have vouched for him. So this woman was very unlikely to have gone beyond that in her checking back on Epstein. Epstein is not the first or the last person that we deal with, that our people have to deal with who's disgusting, who's criminal, who's immoral. Every United States president in my lifetime and before my lifetime was a mass murdering gangster, and we deal with them. I mean, you people say it yourselves.

Epstein was involved with everybody, and everybody was involved with Epstein. Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, on and on. And you say, according to your theory, they were all together doing unspeakable crimes along with him. Right? So now no one is supposed to deal with a Bill Gates.

No one's supposed to deal with a Elon Musk or Bezos, Peter Thiel, Microsoft, Tesla, Amazon, and so on. Of course, they're gonna deal with them. Obviously, they'll deal with them. It's not our fault that your elites and your billionaires are all degenerates. That's your problem.

Your president is a convicted felon. Right? I mean, come on. If we have to do a moral background check on all of your people, then I don't know if there would be anyone left to deal with. Let's be serious.

Especially not according to our criteria, our Islamic criteria. I don't even know which one of you would be allowed into the country, frankly, if we did that. I mean, yes. Think about it. America is gonna start requiring you to hand over all your, online data, your email, your messages, your posts, your, pictures, your contacts, all of that.

Right? We've already talked about that. If you wanna visit that country, you have to turn all that over. So how do you think that's gonna go? If they already have a predisposition to think badly of you because of your race or because of where you come from or because of your religion or because of your politics, They're they're they're already gonna be inclined to misconstrue anything that's in your messages.

And then what if other countries do the same thing? And you can't enter into anyone's country unless you provide all of that. And then you have to prove that your personal moral code as it's reflected in your private data, that that reflects and aligns with the moral code of that country. How's that gonna work out? That effectively would end your international travel.

But you see, we already know that you're a certain kind of way. Muslims, we already know that you're a certain kind of way. We already know that you get up to all kinds of things, and we deal with you anyway. We are cordial with you anyway. We are friendly with you anyway.

We are respectful to you anyway. And if it's literally your job to be cordial, to deal with people, to be friendly and so on, if it's literally your job to do that, then obviously that's what you're gonna do. Right? I mean, think about it. But the way that you people are doing online, subhanAllah, just collective slandering, reputational collective punishment.

It's grotesque. It's truly grotesque. But it's what I said earlier. It's what I said earlier. Once you have determined that someone is bad or someone is guilty of this or that, then you can go ahead and feel free to assume that they're guilty of every other conceivable atrocity that you can imagine or think of.

And anyone and everyone who is associated with them are all in on it together. You can do that. This is how you this is how you operate. And you don't care if you malign or if you slander or if you defame innocent people, decent people, because you're in a frenzy. And you have no idea how to discern or how to be judicious or how to be fair.

And you don't even know what what what does or does not constitute evidence and so on. This is completely out of your wheelhouse. I mean, you're paying attention, if you're paying attention, everything about this Epstein story, everything that's happening around this Epstein story just exemplifies everything that I've talked about with regards to Western so called civilization and about American culture and about American society. And I'm not just talking about Epstein's crimes, not his own crimes themselves. That's not the only thing I'm talking about.

Not just his debauchery and not just his perversion and so forth. And not just the apparent lack of any legal consequences for any of these things. And not just the absolute normality of Epstein's behavior among the rich and powerful in your society. I'm not just talking about that. No.

Everything around this exemplifies it. The mania, the frenzy, the complete inability to be rational, to be reasoning, to be fair, to be honest, the complete inability to do those things, the histrionics, the smearing, the guilt by association, you know, the the scorched earth incriminations, and absolutely bizarre and frankly disturbed direction of your collective imagination. The lack of cognitive skills, the lack of critical thinking, like I said, the emotionalism, the completely and totally unself aware sense of moral outrage and self righteousness, The hypocrisy. The refusal to to to face the realities of your culture and your belief system. Your due process, your evidentiary standards, your right to privacy, your innocent until proven guilty and so forth.

Your age of consent. Because the truth of the matter is that as a society you're not at all agreed about the age of consent. Not at all. So people in Epstein's circle most likely would have overlooked his conviction in 2008 because let's be honest, they did not agree that what he did was morally wrong. That's why they overlooked it.

It was just technically wrong, not morally wrong. Technically wrong, like speeding or drinking and driving or doing illegal drugs that everyone else does also in the country anyway. Do you understand? They see it as illegal, but not necessarily as immoral. Because they see every situation like that as a on a case by case basis, just like speeding or just like drugs or driving drunk.

See? They know that a 14 or a 15 year old is legally a minor, but they don't feel that they are children or they don't feel that they're too young or what have you. This is this is how they feel. And this is something that you do not want to acknowledge. You don't wanna acknowledge that.

Even though your whole culture literally blares this ambiguity or this dubiousness about age of consent across the entirety of your social media. You remember Dave Chappelle did that bit about R Kelly where he said, how old is 15 really? Because you are undecided as a society. Even legally, you're undecided. You know, everyone says it's 18, but it's only 18 in like a dozen states out of 50.

Most states say 16. Do you know that in 1900 in Florida, the age of consent was 10? So it changes from state to state, from year to year, and it changes in terms of the specific circumstances. So, like, for example, in Florida, someone who's under the age of 18 can have sex with someone who's over the age of 18, but under the age of 24, that's not a crime. But if they're over the age of 24, then it is a crime.

You understand? In Florida, before 2016, a 16 year old could marry regardless of the spouse's age if her parents agreed or his parents agreed. Now at 17, I think. Now at 17 with parental approval. In Massachusetts, girls as young as 12 can marry.

Again, regardless of the age of the husband. Thus, you you have four states in America that don't even have a minimum age for marriage. So you are undecided morally and legally about this. Not to mention, one in five girls in The United States have already become sexually active by their fifteenth birthday. And roughly seventy five percent of of your girls are sexually active between the ages of 15 and 17.

So in other words, most of the girls in your society are already sexually active when they are still legal children. And that's legal. That's perfectly legal. As long as their partner is not over 18 or over 24 in Florida. Meaning, if they're doing it with other legal children, it's fine.

If minors and minors are doing it, it's fine. Both legally and we can assume morally as well in your society. Anyway, with moral societal approval. Since we're talking about three quarters of your girls, clearly you approve. Three quarters is almost all.

So you see, you haven't figured it out as a society, as a culture, when it's actually acceptable or not acceptable, at what age it is or is not acceptable. That's the truth. You got twenty one percent of American girls being sexually active before the age of 15, and another fifty three percent by the age of 17. And then the majority of them have their first sexual experience with a partner who is between one to three years older than them. So you can do the math.

So yes, the people in Epstein circle would very likely see his conviction as similar to a drunk driving conviction or something of that nature. You understand? They wouldn't see it as anything monstrous. Because the fact of the matter is that the overwhelming majority of your girls in your society in America, the overwhelming majority of your girls are having sex by the age of the girl in his case, which was 16. And that girl stayed with him for close to three years until she got married in Thailand as Virginia Dufry.

And then the same pattern that was with her gets repeated with other girls around the same age range. You know? Dufry's connection with Epstein seems to have been the longest. Everyone else seems to have been more short term. But the point is, I'm saying that your whole society your whole society actually does not take this issue seriously.

They don't take it seriously at all. Or, anyway, they don't take it take it seriously enough to be decisive about it to have some kind of a consensus about it. Your stance on this issue is completely contradictory. It's inconsistent and it's incoherent. The truth be told, you see it as a technical crime.

It's a technical crime, but it's one that gets violated en masse every day, and you will not address this. You'll never address this because the truth is you like to do what you like to do, but you like to posture as if you disapprove of what you yourselves are doing. You just don't admit it. And you will also not address the very obvious reality that your girls, again, in your society in America, your girls, the overwhelming majority of your girls are number one sexually active as legal minors and number two choose to do so. So seventy five percent of your girls are having sex outside of marriage as minors And they're doing so with agency.

They're doing so by choice. But you wanna pretend that they are innocent. You wanna pretend that they're untouched, inexperienced children depending upon the age of the man that they're doing it with. As if a 15 year old girl and a 15 year old boy having sexual intercourse is like kids in a sandbox playing doctor. It's just sweet and quaint and harmless.

Right? You understand? Your children, including your girls, are first exposed to pornography between the ages of nine and 12 years old. So by the time they're 15, they've likely been consuming that sort of content for years already. I said it before.

Your whole society is a grooming gang. Wallahi, your whole society is a grooming gang. You marinate them. You marinate your children in adult sexual content, in adult sexual themes and imagery and so forth from prepubescence. So by the time they're in their mid teens, they're already sexually active.

In their mid teens, even experienced by that time. While at the same time, you posture about them having some sort of childhood innocence at that age when it suits you. Even though the truth of the matter is that your whole culture has been aggressively eroding that innocence when their age was still in the single digits. The point is there are a massive number of issues. There's a massive number of genuine issues, societal issues, cultural issues, intellectual issues that the Epstein situation highlights.

And you're not addressing any of them. You're not addressing a single one of them. Instead, you're going off the rails with your demonic satanic fantasy scenarios. Going off the deep end like a crazy mob on LSD trying to inflate and conflate and exaggerate and incriminate and assassinate the characters of as many people as you possibly can. And a typical, as I said, scorched earth, shoot first, ask questions later, histrionic frenzy.

I mean, you people could literally read a message, see an email from Epstein that says, my car broke down, and you would say that that that saying my car broke down is code for we're gonna slaughter the babies at midnight. You've lost your minds. Honestly, you've lost your minds. You need to check yourself. And again, it should not need to be said that defending standards, standards of honesty, standards of accuracy, standards of fairness is not in any way whatsoever a defense of Epstein or anyone else.

Listen, if you defend standards of honesty, standards of accuracy, standards of fairness, then you are defending your own self against dishonesty and against inaccuracy and against unfairness being perpetrated against you. You understand? This is very simple to understand. The things that are actually evidenced and the things that are actually proven about what Epstein did are bad enough by any standard of decency and any standard of morality and certainly by Islamic standards. The man was grotesque.

No question. But like I said before, he's not uniquely grotesque to the West. No. He's absolutely standard. One in five of your men use prostitutes.

90% of your men watch porn every week. Millions of your men are OnlyFans subscribers. Sex outside of marriage in your society is so normal, it's so normalized that it's considered bizarre if you don't have sex outside of marriage, if you wait for marriage. One in five men have affairs by their own reporting, and at least half of all Americans say that they've been cheated on. Over half of all Americans say that so called open marriages are fine.

Do you understand what I'm saying? On any given day, twenty percent of you have an STI of some kind. Eighty percent of you have oral herpes right now. I mean, on and on. The truth is that it would you would be hard pressed to find an American male who would not do exactly what Epstein did if he became a billionaire and had the access to do it.

We know this about you. We know this about you, but we deal with you anyway. We know that when we encounter any of you, whether whether it's online or whether it's in person, whether you're on the right or whether you're on the left, whether you're rich or you're poor, we know that in all statistical likelihood you are a fornicating, porn addicted, disloyal, alcohol swilling, drug taking, STD infected, pig eating, moral hypocrite. That's your normal. That's your normal, and we deal with you respectfully anyway.

Do you understand? So what is proven about Epstein the thing that is proven about him, as far as I know, is that he recruited young sexually active girls to be $200 prostitutes for him, and then they would recruit others for him. And then he would more or less be their pimp slash sugar daddy for a limited time making them available for his friends. This is what he did. That's what's factually established.

And like I said, it is sufficiently degenerate. At least for us, that's sufficiently degenerate. But it's not at all fringe. It's not pushing the envelope as far as your society goes. Not at all.

You are not a society with clear moral boundaries on almost anything, on almost anything. And that goes for your men and and it goes for your women. It's the same. One is not better than the other or worse than the other. Do you know you have a website that I forgot what it's called, but it connects the show so called sugar babies with so called sugar daddies.

It's got almost 50,000,000 registered users. And on any given day, you've got 10,000,000 active users on that website per day in The United States. And you've got three sugar babies to every one sugar daddy. That's almost 7,000,000 American women who are right now essentially prostituting themselves for rich men. Plus another you have another two to 3,000,000 literal sex workers on the street, which even that sex workers, right, you turn it change the terminology to legitimize prostitution.

So then that plus that is about 10,000,000 American women who are engaging in exchanging sex for money. And then if you add the OnlyFans to that, that gets to be you'll get around 12,500,000. Add strippers and you get 13,000,000. You can adjust that down to maybe nine or 10,000,000 because there's gonna be considerable overlap between all those categories. But basically, it comes down to about ten percent of the adult female population in The United States Of America.

One out of every 10 of them is a prostitute in one form or another by choice. This is just statistically the facts. Either exchanging money for sex or exchanging money for self sex objectification. And you could reasonably even include models. You could include a whole lot of singers, whole lot of dancers, a whole lot of performers and whatnot who voluntarily hypersexualize themselves, voluntarily objectify themselves by choice for money.

Money from men who have the same mentality as Epstein. If you wanna know who's in on it, if you wanna know who was involved, you're all in on it. That's the truth. The Epstein list is The United States census. But you wanna crucify this one, you wanna crucify that one regardless of any proof, regardless of any proof or evidence of wrongdoing on their part because they knew him, because they met him, because they corresponded with him and what have you.

They met him, they corresponded with him. You made him. You made him. But you wanna attack everyone. You wanna attack everyone but your society and but your culture.

And then we've got some of these westernized, psychologically colonized Muslims online who just wanna use Epstein as a way to attack other Muslims because they dealt with him. They dealt with the man. They corresponded with the man. So they're spreading the most defamatory slanders about other Muslims. About a Muslim sister, subhanAllah, with no evidence, with no proof, with nothing but malice, with malicious because you're addicted to that.

You're assimilated to that now. You copied that from your non Muslim hosts. You learned that from them. That completely un Islamic unseriousness and that completely un Islamic disregard for the truth, disregard for fairness, disregard for honesty, disregard for balance. So you try to whip up as much malice and as much rancor as you possibly can against your own brothers and sisters because you think being Emirati, you think being Saudi, you know, or being from whatever country is currently making progress towards their own political independence and economic sovereignty, their own liberation from your host country, from your bosses, you think that they don't have the same right as any other Muslim.

You think that they're ineligible for the same respect and the same defense and the same as any other Muslim. You think if they have a GCC passport of some kind or they have an Egyptian passport or they have a Jordanian passport or they have a Syrian passport, then you think that their name and their honor and their reputation is not sacred and inviolable. So when they say that an Emirati sister procured children for Epstein based on a joke that she made about girls taking a long time to get ready. And I call you out for that. I call you out for that sick accusation.

Oh, there goes Shahid again covering up for The Emirates. GCC agent always defending The UAE. No. It's called defending a Muslim. It's called defending a Muslim no matter where she's from, no matter where he's from.

It doesn't matter. It's called defending fairness and honesty itself. I would call you out for that filthy slander. If she was from any country, it doesn't matter because she's from the of Muhammad But you learned shamelessness from your hosts, from your bosses in America, in the West, in The UK, and you're running cover for them. Going after your favorite targets, own brothers and sisters, and calling yourself righteous for doing it.

Oh, look. A piece of the curtain of the Kaaba was sent to Epstein. Let's hype that up. First of all, it's already been debunked. It's already been debunked.

But let's say it happened. And what? Do we worship pieces of cloth now? Because it was covering the Kaaba? What?

You think it would absorb some sort of holiness or something? Do you understand it gets changed every year, and pieces are distributed every year and sold every year? So what? So what? What are you even on about?

It's just an ignorant issue to rage bait the ignorant. Again, it's just to to find any kind of way to attack and denigrate the Muslims. You need to check yourself and understand, investigate yourself, examine yourself. You've been inhaling the western pathogens for far too long apparently. And you've developed all the same symptoms as those people, the same illnesses.

And this is what you need to understand. This is what you need okay. This is what you should understand or what you should at least know that it is actually important for you to understand, and that is that you look like fools. I'm telling you, you look like fools. And I don't just mean the psychologically colonized Muslims only.

No. Of course not. Obviously. But the ones that they assimilated with, all of you who are abandoning anything like fairness, abandoning anything like honesty, anything like reason, anything like sense, anything like deliberation and discernment and intelligence, you look like fools. You look insane.

And as long as you're acting like that, this is what you I'm trying to get you to understand. As long as you act like that, you are absolutely consigning yourselves to irrelevance. Please understand me. No one is gonna listen to you. No one is gonna trust you.

No one is gonna respect you. Because the only thing that we ever see you doing online, the only thing that we ever see you doing online is crash out. You are perpetually, endlessly crashing out and you're doing it in public. Online, on camera, in 280 characters per tweet. You think that you're saying something, like, you you think you're saying something important.

Epstein was the high priest of a satanic cult using babies as cream cheese and engineering all major world events. And you think that you're saying something. You think that you're, I don't know, raising awareness, teaching the people and whatnot. But the only thing the only thing that any intelligent person hears is you saying that your own mind is a scrambled egg. So you get tuned out.

You get banished from grown up conversation. Do you understand me? Never gonna be someone whose opinion matters. You're never gonna be someone whose voice matters because you have no self control. You have no restraint.

You have no discipline on your tongue and on your mind. You have no intellectual rigor. I mean, you're all on here talking about it's in the files. It's in the files. It's all over the files.

Meanwhile, the files are some 3,000,000 individual documents that have to be opened separately and one at a time. So you know very well that you can say it's in the files. It's all over the files and no one's gonna check because the truth is you didn't check your own self. Be honest. But you can say that, you can say it's in the files because you think it's in the files or because you you think it's probably in the files in one way or another or you think it's in the files but it's just between the lines.

Your imagination is the citation. And this is why you're irrelevant. I'm telling you this because you might wanna not be irrelevant. You understand? I'm saying this because you might not wanna be irrelevant.

You might wanna consider not being like this. You might wanna consider trying to be someone who matters. Trying to be someone whose voice will actually be listened to and respected because you are consistently honest and measured and fair and balanced. Not hysterical, not histrionic, not ranting and not delusional. I'm telling you this because it's bad for you to be like this.

The way that you're acting is not in your interest. I mean, it's one thing to go, you know, it's one thing to go down a rabbit hole. It's another thing entirely to dig at yourself. And that's what you're doing. Normal people look at you like the guy on the beach walking around with a metal detector, listening to a police scanner.

You're not normal. This is not normal. And the irony is that you think of what you're doing, the slandering, the maligning and so forth, and really the the the the openly fantasizing about sadistic scenarios and global conspiracies. You think that you're doing something important. You think you're doing something world shaking when all you are actually doing in reality is self exiting from meaningful discourse.

This is the truth. There are genuinely serious issues to talk about that the Epstein case highlights. There are serious genuinely serious things to talk about. But everything that you're talking about, you're talking about it to avoid talking about the actually important meaningful things.