Middle Nation Content Talks: Europe's Destabilisation Project

Okay. It's thirty five, so we will start and, you know, the rest will join. So So today, we will be discussing the ongoing destabilization of Europe. Okay? And this has mainly been shaped by, you know, some external financial and political forces.

In this today's discussion, inshallah, we'll seek to somehow uncover what are the factors, why is this happening, who are the actors, how are they doing it. So we will try to, you know, assess what is essentially influencing Europe's current events until now, what happened since, okay, let's say, the Ukrainian war where it, you know, picked up the pace. And from that, we, inshallah, try to assess what is the future trajectory, what are the possible options that Europe might have, and the respective countries in Europe. So, miss Malahman Rahim, this is just some introduction because the video that we'll be looking at is called Europe at a crossroads. Okay?

And that's essentially the endpoint, right, of the discussion that we will have. Yeah? Because now the video is about basically the it has two options. Yeah. Europe, either follow the predatory supporter, quote, unquote, that was there until now or try to realign with the global South and try to, you know, focus on that aspect.

Right? But to understand the future trajectory, we need to understand what got us into this point. Right? So inshallah, the discussion later, we'll focus on that, but I'll just give the video now to understand where we are and what's coming. K?

So enjoy, and then we will focus on the rest.

Well, Europe is really at a crossroads. The EU, The UK, all of America's Western so called allies, they need to make a an urgent reassessment of their relationship with The United States. Of course, this also means that the people of those countries in the EU and so on, they need to make a serious reevaluation of their own leaders, all of whom are just going along with America's plans and who seem to be the only leaders left in the world who still think it's a good idea to follow Washington's orders. Know, 60% of Europeans no longer feel that America is a reliable ally or partner. That puts EU leadership at odds with the population in this regard.

Even the European Council on Foreign Relations said that America's interests and Europe's interests no longer align particularly on trade and security issues. And, of course, they're right. America has been pursuing a systematic campaign of destabilization across Europe for years and particularly since the Ukraine war and the Russian sanctions. I've been talking about that since the beginning. Thanks to these policies, Europe is in a death spiral.

Bankruptcies are at record highs, business closures, home foreclosures, companies relocating, factories shutting down. I mean, Germany is in a a rapid state of deindustrialization. America is trying to pit Europe against Russia, pit The UK against Russia, which is depriving the whole continent of affordable energy as prompting militarization, which they can't afford, all of which is for the benefit of American oil and gas companies and for The US weapons sector. People are becoming radicalized. Extremism of all stripes is emerging.

You know? Europeans feel that their societies are more polarized than ever. Protests are taking place more frequently and are turning violent more frequently. Repression is getting worse. It's getting more severe.

Terrorist attacks are increasing, particularly from far right groups. The internationals the International Center for Counterterrorism attributes this, at least in part, to the war in Ukraine and the influx of neo Nazis and other extremists and the flood of small arms that were supposedly being sent to Ukraine. The whole continent is sliding into irreversible strife, and that's blatantly by American design. The US is also trying to drive a wedge between Europe and China even though they desperately need Europe desperately needs Chinese investment, Chinese capital, Chinese technology, and the Chinese market for their own exports. And, again, European leaders are just going along with this in defiance of their own populations and, obviously, against the interests of their own people because EU leaders are subservient to Washington neocons.

America always intended for the war in Ukraine to spread. They never intended for Ukraine to win. The whole point was always to accelerate Europe's destabilization, their isolation, and their deterioration. And so far, no

one is doing anything whatsoever to pump the brakes. So, yes, America and its so called western allies, The UK, the EU, are really at

a make or break point. You know, people always talk about being on the right side of history. Well, Europe needs to start making decisions on the right side of the future because their relationship with The United States has frankly put them into an existential crisis. The fact is BRICS is building an alternative to the old US led world order, and Britain and the EU need to understand this. The global system of the twentieth century is a relic.

The balance of power no longer favors the g seven, and the Global South is the only vehicle left with wheels still on it and with a working engine. And Europe needs to hitch a ride with them if they don't want uncle Sam to drive them off a cliff because that's where they're going now. I mean, I know it's gonna be a a traumatic adjustment for these Westerners, for these Europeans, accepting the fact that your so called Western civilization and your societies are actually unsustainable and your great American protector and benefactor is actually cannibalizing you. But on the other hand, turning to the global South for your survival isn't really anything new. I mean, you never would have actually even been anything of significance without your imperialism and colonization of Africa and Asia.

So the truth is that you've always been a dependency, and you still are. The difference is that you used to get to pretend that you weren't the dependent one because you used to be able to just steal from the global South in order to prop up your societies. But you've always been dependent, so there's no real change there. Just a an attitude adjustment is necessary and an acceptance of your real status vis a vis the global South. You will have to humble yourselves to some degree to cooperate with Bricks.

But believe me, it's better than the utter humiliation that you're gonna suffer if you continue cooperating with the Americans.

Okay. Hope you enjoyed this. Inshallah. So as brother Shahid explains in the video, right, you know, Europe now finds itself faced with this critical choice. Right?

Either we continue aligning in the same relationship with The United States neocons as we have been until now, right? And we see where that has led us or we shift. There is no other option. This can be an opportunity for Europe, right, where essentially it will try to move on from its historical dependence on the West to a dependence that actually might even treat their people well. Right?

Because until now, it has been in this position of just serving the purpose of some elite. Right? And it's a nonnational elite. It's an elite that only cares about profit. Right?

And, of course, we see the similar trend in The United States. Right? So this is a western trend. Right? It's not just specific to Europe, but Europe is now gonna probably serve a different role, right, from the perspective of what we see going on.

So I think that we need to try to go to the source. Right? So the first of all, like, the first question that pops up when talking about this destabilization project is basically why even have this destabilization. Right? So what is the purpose of having a destabilized Europe?

How would that serve anyone? How would they you know, why would they try to impose this policy? Why would they try to shift Europe towards a conflict zone? So these are all questions that we need to address before moving on and trying to see who is the actors who are the actors responsible, how which role they play in this project. So I'll try to ask, in all our speakers, so anyone feel free to reply.

You know, why would the OCGFC okay. Maybe you can even speak about the OCGFC if you want because some of our listeners might not have heard about that term before. Right? So what are the drivers of this g OC GFC? Maybe sister Samira or sister Eman, like, who gave rise to these entities?

You know, how are they able to wield such power? Right? Like, how come that we have some entities, you know, these owners and controls of global financialized capital, the they are able to dictate the policy of a whole continent. Right? So if maybe you can just give an introduction to these players so we understand better what their motives might be in regards to European policy.

Assalamu alaikum. Bratavaili to everyone, listeners, to all the listeners here. I've been listening about well, I've been following Middle Nation videos on this, like it's been a while, but regarding the OC GFC, that's when I first heard it from from the Middle Nations YouTube channel, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital. And to be honest, when you first listen to the videos on on this OCGFC, you kind of tend to not really grasp the term. But as events unfolded and well, the only thing that you need to think about them when it comes to them is they're just interested in profit.

That's the most important thing to understand that they are just they do anything. They don't have any feelings for nationalism. They don't believe in ideology. They don't have any ideology except the ideology of money profiting. And so once you understand that part, then you can understand why they are trying to well, you can understand all the movement that is going on around the world, all the shifting global shifts and dynamics that are changing.

And when it comes to Europe, as you mentioned, there is this Europe is becoming unstable, unsustainable in terms of its demographics, for example, where there is a decline in its demographics and there is also the stagnation economic stagnation. And it's becoming really irrelevant in the global stage. It's like a dying empire, a dying continent, as they used to say to Turkey during the Ottoman Empire. And so the OCGFC seems to think that it's not really profitable to except to create war, except to create a destabilization in that area, in that continent, that's the only way they can get profit from such a continent, a dying continent. And so this is how I understood what the OCGFC is trying to do in Europe and why they are trying to destabilize the continent, because it makes money out of destabilizing the continent.

Thank you very much, sister Samira. Yeah, brother, MJ, please feel free to.

Yeah. I would like to add also that mainly, as you said, when we're talking about the rules, we have to understand that the current corporate and banking elite or what people call also the OGCFC, they are originally from Europe. And as Shahid also said that one of the things one of the characteristics about Europe is the harsh conditions, the harsh environments that make what I call predatory survivability something of the norm in that part of the world. Now, we're here looking also at not just behavioral factors, but what drives these behavioral factors, most notably the environmental factors as well. So Europe as a continent, first of all, is very tribal.

Like, we we shouldn't be too much preoccupied by how the social management the existing social management system is working. At the core, it's a very tribal continent. Also, you have yeah. You also have a

a

a climate that we can say that is almost for half the year like a desert. With the exception of Mediterranean Europe, you have Central Europe and Northern Europe. Half the time of the year, the conditions, at least when I'm talking here about the historical conditions. So we're talking about a millennia ago at at least. Most of the time, it's freezing temperatures.

You can't cultivate. You can't farm. It's very harsh. And so at least during half the half the seasonal year, it is very nomadic and predatory. So this is where I would say the origins of why such behavior exists.

And of course, because of that, as the historical process proceeds and as these, how we say, corporate and banking lead or OGCFC, OCGFC evolves, they begin to realize that from a feasibility standpoint and from a profitability standpoint, it is better to just move away from that continent and go to, how we say, the Mediterranean Basin. So I wouldn't say that they want to move away from all of Europe because some parts of Europe are still, how we say, environmentally habitable. And so what you have basically, for example, countries like the Mid in in the eleventh, but also Egypt and The Middle East, you can cultivate land and for basically all every single day of the year. The weather most of the time is the variability of the weather during the year is not that big, and so you can cultivate land and and make it an agricultural breadbasket for most of the year. In Europe, even though we have the technology and means to do even though we have the technology and means to do that in in Europe, it is still expensive.

So there is that aspect. Now, of course, putting aside all the other things, we're talking about just also the the resources, the the fossil fuels, the solar energy, etcetera. So for them, it is much more feasible to go to areas where there it's already rich and existing and areas where you also have a younger population, not an aging population. Yeah. And I think that's my input from that from that angle.

And if anyone cares to add or maybe correct anything I may have made a mistake on, I'm more than welcome.

No. Thank you very much, brother. You are right exactly. Like, for sure, you know, essentially, these companies that we now have or these, you know, owners and controllers of global financialized capital, like, the West, as you said correctly, gave rise to them, right, and to their behavior. And, basically, like, we had it before in, you know, public hands, right, with the Dutch East Indian company and British Indian company.

Now we just shifted to private hands. Right? Like, there is nothing different than the same behavior that the states used to do in the colonial times. Now it's just private entities doing the same. Right? So

So we moved from, you know, public slavery to private slavery, you know, public subjugation to private subjugation. Right? But now if we shift it, like, specifically to European context, right, like, what would be the potential benefits for them to turn it into a conflict zone? Right? Like, usually, they will tell you, you know, in economics that you need a harmonious, prosperous society to be able to get productivity, right, and, like, have economic growth and benefits the investors.

So how can they essentially profit from conflict? Right? And, basically, also try to relate it to how does this align with their historic historical strategies, right, what they did in, you know, Africa, what they did in Latin America, what they did in Southeast Asia, in Asia in general. Right? Like, this is their approach to the rest of the world.

And now, basically, what we are seeing is the shift that it's gonna be you know, the rest of the world is gonna become Europe, and Europe is gonna become the rest of the world, basically. Right? So there's gonna be this shift in approach to the rest of the world from the perspective of the OCGFC. Right?

Yeah. So I I don't think it's going to be that black and white, in my opinion. I mean, Europe also is a very diverse continent. Western Europe, I think, in general, when I'm talking about Western Europe, I'm talking about, of course, The United Kingdom, France, Belgium, The Netherlands, maybe The Netherlands, so forth. It's I think because of the demographic crisis they're facing, I don't think they will go into the kind of conflicts that I foresee with Eastern Europe, especially between Poland and Russia.

So we could see Western Europe slowly getting integrated into BRICS as a result of the population demographics changing, and you have the the bottom up push for governments to become more cooperative with BRICS. I don't see it that way with many of the Central European countries like Poland and the Baltics. And because of the the how you say the the conflict they would have with Russia. So we have for you to take this approach, we have to kind of dissect the continent and see which parts of the continent are subject to joining bricks based on the population demographics and based on the historical circumstances, which will be pushed off the cliff to be blunt about it.

Yeah. Thank you. Maybe sister Eman, I know you are, like, you know, in the invoking the article six. And, basically, that is against, you know, trying to kick out this approach that The US has to the rest of the world. Right?

So you probably already, you know, have some idea about why they want conflict. Right? And especially, can see it, for example, through Israel, right, nowadays. Right? Why this is, you know, profitable investment to some degree.

So I'm just, you know, trying to search for means why they wanna create conflict zones. What is the benefit for them? Right?

Yeah. I think one of the reasons for like, the reason why they want to drive Europe into a conflict zone. I don't think it's random. I think it's caused by, like, a calculated move to be able to transform Europe into an area, a zone that brings more money into essentially what we would call the military industrial complex. I think the the way they make this money, the mechanism of it is basically profiting off of war and basically increasing their basically, profiting off of war so that they could create financial gain through things like arms sales, reconstruction contracts, and resource extractions under duress.

So, essentially, to be able to make money I mean, I think we've we've seen this across the entire Middle East. We've seen this in multiple different countries where they make money from all of this by selling arms, by offering to reconstruct certain places in certain countries, labeling it as a hand of a truce or of peace. And so, for example, if The United States were to instigate a sort of war zone within Europe, what they could do is create this war. Firstly, they they're making money off of this war. And even after it's done, America, of course, obviously, always benefits from geography due to the fact they're a lot further away than any other country within Europe.

Obviously, they're across the Atlantic. And so what they would do is they wouldn't have to reconstruct their own country, but they would reconstruct other countries, and they would pay them. So, again, that could essentially bring the money back in to the military industrial complex, and we know that The United States owns about 40% of that. And that's why we're not seeing the same level of dishevelment within The United States, and I think that's why we're seeing it within Europe.

Yeah. You're right. Exactly. And as sister Samira pointed out, right, these people, you know, they care only about profit. So, you know, every approach to a country from their perspective is an investment.

Right? And, you know, Europe is just not a profitable investment anymore. Right? That is, like, how I see it, to be honest. Right?

Like, what is like, what can Europe do to make it a profitable investment? Like, I when I was thinking about it personally, I have no idea. Right? Like, it doesn't have resources. Maybe it has some, you know, universities What kind of education.

Right? Like, it's just, again, you know, western indoctrination type of education. Right? So it's very hard to find any aspect of European society or continent or, you know, general economy that would make it viable as an investment opportunity for something. Like, I was even thinking about it from my own perspective.

Right? If I, you know, were given the option to buy a house in what I know, like Germany or in, you know, Saudi or Dubai, there's probably not too much to think about, right, or in Egypt or whatever. Like, in these, you know, coming up economies, inshallah, the with Allah's help, inshallah, will be, you know, the global superpowers in the next world order. But, you know, like, that's the kind of thinking that even a regular person like me might have. So what about, you know, the people who basically all they think about is profiting and, you know, investments.

Right? So maybe brother MG or Inan, I see your hands raised, but, you know, let's try to keep it to the point just so we can move on next.

I think also with, yeah, with what you said about, yeah, what what's in it for you. Yeah. I definitely agree. I mean, even even with the education because what we have seen over time is that the educational system has become more, how you say, all around and lacks depth. So you're also starting to have a unemployment crisis in Europe as a result of low skilled workers or sorry, as as a result of basically, not low skilled workers, as a result of workers, not enough work many potential employees that have to do white collar jobs and less of them having to do low skilled jobs.

And this is becoming a problem because now you have a rise in these countries and bottleneck professions, especially with regards to the professions that are very important in sustaining a civilization. So we're talking here about mechanics, nurses, teachers, etcetera.

Yeah. I kind of wanted to hop into that point as well. There is less and less manual labor working available. And because I'm in The UK, I'm gonna kind of focus on here because The UK does pride itself with the fact that it's a tertiary sector economy, and so it provides services. And that's kind of its downfall again because it it doesn't it's not a primary sector or a secondary sector, which is harvesting crops or growing them and everything.

We don't do that too much within The United Kingdom, especially because of our weather. I mean, we're in September, and it's about four degrees out here. So it's not it's not a great habitable place for plants and everything. So it kind of rides off of what MG was saying earlier. So, again, this rides off of what brother Raleigh was saying.

The Europe doesn't have too much to offer, and The UK does pride itself on the fact that it offers services, but services are not going to keep increasing this money within the OCGFC. It's not gonna be as important as it as it was, let's say, ten years ago. Now any country can become a tertiary sector country, plus they can be a primary and secondary, but The UK can only ever offer tertiary sector things because we quite literally do not have the ability to do anything else.

Can you hear me? Europe

has been living a lifestyle and enjoying a status at least since World War two that they didn't really have to work for and they didn't have to earn. You can say that prior to World War two with when when they were colonial powers, Europe basically survived by being a vampire in the world. And after World War two, they couldn't really be a successful vampire anymore, so they were just getting blood transfusions from The United States that enabled them to continue enjoying something like the status that they had prior to losing their colonial empires. But those days are over now. Now, the the The United States doesn't have a need to continue propping up Europe, and that's what they've been doing since World War two.

They've been propping up Europe. And when they have when they were able to enjoy that sort of a status, they built a system or they developed a system across Europe. Obviously, what what MG said is correct, and that you you actually do have to dissect it and go country by country. But just speaking generally, and he's correct also, and that we're we're basically talking about Atlantic Europe or or Western Europe or what have you. Not Eastern Europe so much, obviously.

But the the system that they created from the perspective of the OCGFC, you could say that Europe's their economic model that they were able to enjoy for the last, you know, eight decades or so doesn't align with the interest of the OCGFC. It's unsustainable as far as they're concerned because it doesn't align with their relentless pursuit of profit maximization and unfettered market dominance. Because they were able to enjoy this this sort of prestige and this this high income status that they weren't, that they weren't actually producing themselves. They they started they they they incorporated this social welfare system, for example. They had fairly strong labor protections and regulations that as far as the OCGFC, this this this limits their ability to exploit whatever resources Europe has and the so called human capital, you know.

They they they maintained a certain degree of social stability, but that was subsidized by the Americans to a great degree in terms of The United States guaranteeing global trade, taking responsibility for security for global trade. But what the what the OCGFC want in every country is deregulated hyper capitalism and a very a sort of a a a free like, I didn't even want to say free market because it's it's not it's not even the right word. A sort of a anarch anarchic market that financialized capital can thrive in. So for the for the global elite, for the OCGFC, the European model with their, for example, basically socialist state involvement in healthcare, in education, social services, so on. That slows down the race to the bottom that they need in order to ensure ever increasing returns on their investment.

Financialized capital relies on the unfettered movement of capital, minimal regulation, the ability to exploit labor without any interference of, organized labor unions and so on or the national government. Europe does have a kind of a history of social democracy and a political culture that's still, maintained, you know, until recently, we're we're seeing it change now, but certain checks on corporate excess. I mean, as you see the the the for example, with the GMOs that are the the genetically modified foods and and whatnot that are freely available in The United States. They still have some restrictions on that in Europe, and this stands in the way of the the the plans and the ambitions of the OCGFC. So what would they do when a model is not conducive to their goals?

Well, obviously, they shift towards destabilization. If you can foster economic crises, you can promote austerity measures, you can manipulate the the political forces and put the push the society towards nationalism, which which is a driving force for conflict, populism, which is a driving force for internal conflict. They they they can undermine the the the foundations of the whole European economic model. The destabilization strategy is designed to erode public confidence in the state's ability to manage the economy. So that they can this will then rationalize, and it can even lead to demands by the public themselves for deregulation and privatization and cuts to social services.

All of these austerity measures that have create precisely the conditions in the society that the the OCGFC thrive in. I mean, furthermore, with with globalization, financialized capital, as I've talked about many, many times on the channel, it no longer depends on the wealth of individual nations. It feeds off of crises. It thrives on volatility. It grows stronger when it can manipulate markets unchallenged.

A stable Europe is too regulated for them. It's too balanced for this. Destabilization allows financial capital to enter new market new new markets under conditions where governments are weakened. That's the whole point. That's the whole drive behind neoliberalism, to weaken the state apparatus.

And then the the the entire social contract is torn apart, And that allows the owners and controllers of global financialized capital to extract more wealth more freely. So Europe's social and economic protections that that, you know, it it probably won't be long. I was talking to my wife just about this the other day, that it's funny that America has always been, you know, sort of fear mongering about communism and leftism and socialism. Meanwhile, most of Europe is socialist, but they never mentioned that. They have socialist policies.

They have parties that they call themselves socialist, but no one mentions that. I wouldn't be surprised if you start hearing him talk about it. Where where now we America will start calling out all of these socialists in in Europe. Demonizing socialism in Europe where they used to turn the other way, they would they would demonize socialism and they would go to all sorts of covert operations against socialists in the global South, but they turned the other way when they were socialists in Europe. I mean, except in certain places where they were like directly communist, like in Greece and Italy and so on, but socialism they tolerated in Europe.

I wouldn't be surprised if you see the the the same old rhetoric from the Cold War era come back again where they talk about socialists and leftists and so on in Europe where you need to get rid of that. Then there's also, obviously, there's the the demographics factor. As MG pointed out, that demographically they are not able to even replenish their population. They can't do the work. They they can't produce enough workers.

They can't produce enough consumers. So what what does a vampire do? What does a parasite do? They it's not a productive entity. It doesn't produce.

It only consumes. And if you're not able to find a way to to acquire all of the things that you want to consume through your own power and dominance and violence and so forth, like they did in the colonial times. If you're not able to do that and they're not able to do that, then what do you do? You starve Or you will be consumed by an by the one who has the power to to to treat you the same way that they have that you treated the global South. And that's that's what they're doing and that's just the iman said.

I mean, you have obviously, if you have conflict across Europe, then this is the one thing that Europe can do to justify its existence to the owners and controllers of global financial as capitalists. The only thing that they can do to show that they have something to offer, they can offer to war profiteering, to arms, to reconstruction contracts. And if you create these kind of conditions in the society, obviously that is gonna lead to privatization of public assets because governments are gonna go bankrupt as we're seeing anyway. And it's got that that will then also lead to increased financialization. Conflicts can create new opportunities for that such as the the creation of new financial instruments, the the expansion of financial markets, the growth of the shadow banking system.

And then also all of that will completely, I won't even say, it's it's not even enough to say weekend. It will devastate any labor movement across Europe. The labor movement will have no power whatsoever. There will be no collective bargaining. There'll be nothing.

People will be desperate for any kind of an income. I mean, now, sister Eman was talking about England or The UK. If you The UK if you talk about The UK economy, you're talking about London. You're talking about one city, basically, what it comes down to is you're talking about London. One wealthy city, in in an entire country.

If you were to separate that and divide it out, say the North Of London or or sorry, the North Of England. If if the North Of England was a country, it wouldn't be a wealthy country. That would that would be that would be a a low income country. And the same the same goes for for throughout Europe. You can look at France, you can look at Germany, you can look at almost any any country that that that their, GDP, what they claim about themselves to be a g their GDP in their high income status or what have you.

If you actually divided that country into sections and and take it outside of say Berlin or Paris or what have you. And look at the the the other parts of the country and compare the per capita GDP of that part of the country, that county or that province or what have you. Those would be poor countries, if they were countries. The majority of people in Europe are not living the life that they're that they have been used to because exactly what I what I'm talking about is already underway and it's only accelerated, and intensified, once the start of with with the start of the Ukraine war and the sanctions against Russia, whereby Europe cut themselves off, insanely cut themselves off from affordable energy. And The United States is trying to push them to drive a wedge between them and China, which they desperately need that relationship economically.

So Europe is being it's very clear and if you look at any of the economic numbers, I mean, just saw I just saw about Germany that the the economy is in decline not just in decline, it's in contraction. That the economy is going to shrink, and that they don't even expect more than they're not even gonna they're not even gonna have growth on the left side of the decimal point for at least two years. If that, that's even your that's wishful thinking that in 2026, you're gonna see growth in the German economy. It's contracting and there's not any sign that there's any reason for it to not contract, not continue to be in recession. Germany is in recession if anyone is being honest.

So, yes, the the the the the only thing that Europe has to offer, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital, is basically to sacrifice themselves as conflict zone in one form or another whether that's conflict between states or internal conflicts between political factions within a country, terrorist activity within a country between being perpetrated by this radical group or that radical group, whether it's from the left or the right, or whether it's Muslim radicals or Christian radicals or what have you. I I I don't see anything in the future for Europe except this kind of chaos and dystopian scenario.

That was packed. And what I would take from I just you know, something stick to stuck to me from what you just said, brother, that, essentially, we need to understand that this has been always the policy towards Europe. Right? At first, after World War two, it was through, you know, economic subjugation means. Right?

So they tried to with, you know, withhold different economic aids to countries. That was the approach how they you know, what they did. Yeah? So they basically blackmailed Italy. They blackmailed Greece, and they blackmailed a lot of other countries.

So for since the beginning, European countries were in a sort of inferior position towards these guys. Right? And all the policies and so, you know, you see this trend of it has accelerated now, but it has always been there. Like, Europe had a specific purpose for these guys, and now the purpose is changing. Well, not the purpose, but the way by which to achieve that purpose.

So by that, I mean, for example, after you know, in the sixties, there was kind of a heavier state control in European countries. Right? So what did they have to do? They had to start, you know, coming up with theories, how to explain that basically state control is bad. And then in the seventies and eighties, we had all of these neoliberal movements in Germany and The UK, like current UK policy and, you know, how it approaches the economy is basically dictated from the eighties with, you know, Margaret Stutcher.

Right? And these all kind of entities that were available at that time. And they were promoting basically to just deregulate the economy, give it all into private hands. Right? And, again, it you know, this is not the will of the people.

Right? This is just some machinations in the background to make use of Europe. Right? And that was the use at that time. Right?

But I feel that since the global financial crisis, this has has stopped. Right? And suddenly, they had to rethink how can we achieve something from Europe by different means. And that's why now the destabilization came into play. Right?

Like, before, there were other viable options how to, you know, extract the most. But now this is probably the best option that they have or that they, you know, figured out. Alright? So that's I I get this feeling with Allah. Right?

I don't know if anyone agrees. But, yeah, subhanAllah. Right? So and Yeah.

What you're you're I'm sorry to interrupt, but, you're you're you're absolutely right. I mean, and the the fact of the matter is that I mean, this is something that it's kind of a theme on the channel, which is that they they've never really changed. Western so called civilization never civilized and then they they never really changed. You you pretended that you went through these drastic changes and with your so called enlightenment that there was this drastic change and now suddenly everything is different. No.

Not nothing's really different. You still have a feudal system. You're still the same way you were before. You still have serfs and landlords. You still have all of that.

Yeah. You just call it by different names and it's maybe a different set of people who are in charge. And that's exactly the same as it was when your church was in charge. You just gave the the the godlike authority, you took it away from the church and now gave it to private capital. It's a secular theocracy because your oligarchs are like are like have holy power.

They have sacred power and you can't even talk about it. And everyone can pretend that we have our democratic system and our our our political system and so forth. Meanwhile, all the actual power and all the actual decisions is is still being made by the feudal lords who have been who are sacrosanct. And what they say goes, and no one can say anything about it. They're not they're not subject to democratic means.

I mean, Europe, like I was saying, you had some degree and have had some degree of controls on what corporations can get away with, but those days are gone. Anyway, days are numbered. It's not going to be long before, the same way that they did the the they'll do the same thing in Europe that they did in Latin America in the nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties. They'll do the same thing that they did in Africa in the nineteen nineties and the February. They'll do the same thing that they did in The Middle East in the February.

They'll do the same thing they did it that that they did in Eastern Europe in that same time period after the after the collapse of the Soviet Union. They'll do the same thing to Western Europe. You think, I don't know, because you're white or because you're Western or what have you. Maybe you you believe that you're supposed to have some kind of a a a an untouchable status that they can't that they can't eat you. No.

They will. They they've seen that it works in everywhere else around the world, and now they don't care about nations anymore. They don't care about nationality anymore. Your the your British passport's not gonna save you. Your your union, Jack, is not gonna shield you from the the the devouring savage monster of global financialized capital.

No. They'll they'll eat you the same way that they ate the global South. And they'll just like MG was saying, they know better than anyone else which side of the bread is buttered. And they know that the future is not in the West. They know perfectly well that the future is not in the West and they've already secured for themselves the ability to move.

They're not tied anymore. I mean, you can you can you were talking earlier about like how this all developed. We don't really have time to get into it, but I mean, you can map the chronology of how corporate power became what it became, and how financialized capital became the power that it became. The super national that that's floating above borders type of power that they that they have achieved is through court made law in The United States going all the way back to the eighteen eighties with the Southern Pacific Railroad. It it it's to the to the robber barons that that that developed in the in the early twentieth century.

You can you can look at the the Taft Hartley Act that restricted labor union activities in the what was that? In the like 1947 or I think in the in the forties somewhere. The interstate commerce commissions deregulation of industries like trucking and airlines and telecommunication in seventies and the nineteen eighties. And then the the whole so called Reagan revolution, which coincided with what you're talking about Margaret Thatcher, with their policy of tax cuts and deregulation, empowering corporations and and the the whole rise of neoliberalism. And then you move forward into the Clinton era with the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Telecommunications Act of the of 1996 that deregulated the telecommunications industry.

And then of course, the Citizens United case that gave corporations the status of of people and gave them unrestricted the unrestricted ability to buy politicians and to buy the government. So I mean, there's milestones in the development of this beast. The the development of this monster. And and with each milestone, as they passed each milestone, the acceleration rate increased and their power increased with each one, which then enabled the next milestone to be achieved. It's it's you can you can you can map the rise of this monster going all the way back, as I say, the eighteen eighteen eighties, more than a 100 ago, a hundred fifty years ago.

But it's so it's it's not something that's new, but the the the delusional thing is for anyone to think that this monster regards anyone as being untouchable. And that that that Europe, that Western Europe, that, France and The UK or Germany or what have you. I mean, look at what they're doing to Germany. They're they're de industrializing Germany. It's breathtaking.

The the number the number of bankruptcies, the number of factory closures, the number of factories leaving. I just saw a a thing where where Donald Trump, said that basically if he if he gets elected president, he's gonna try to take all the jobs from Germany. Gonna try to take all the companies out of Germany and have them move to The US. They're not they're not discreet about what their plans are. This is this is a a a cannibalistic monster that you created and and it's coming after you, and you shouldn't be surprised.