Article 6 Livestream: Global Liberation (recorded)

If there's a wolf in the day care center, the problem isn't the day care center. If you have a wolf in a nursery, if you have a wolf in a kindergarten or a preschool, the problem isn't the nursery or the preschool or the kindergarten. The problem is the wolf. You have to take care of that wolf. Otherwise, it's going to continue to be a menace to your children or other people's children or to the whole neighborhood.

So, dismantling the United Nations is a complete misdiagnosis of what the problem is. If you're someone who says that, well, the United Nations isn't working properly, therefore, we should dismantle it, then you must be someone who anytime you get a virus on your phone or virus on your computer, you just immediately throw it away and buy a new one rather than fixing the problem. You have to fix the problem, and the problem isn't, for example, the United Nations. The problem isn't the UN Charter. The problem isn't international law.

The problem isn't all of the obligations and treaties and conventions that have been put into effect by the United Nations. The problem is that The United States dominates that organization to ensure that none of these things can be enforced. The United States dominates the United Nations to make sure that that, organization can only ever be used as an instrument for the internationalization of American policy. So you have to identify what the problem is and remove the problem because the organization itself is good. The organization itself is powerful.

The organization itself is important, and you know it's important because America wants to control it. The same way that they want to control any other resources that exist on earth. The same way that they want to control anything else that is of value or that has power. They want to control anything and everything, that's an important, useful, powerful resource in the world, and that's why they want to control the United Nations. They want to control the United Nations so that they can have the power of impunity from that organization.

So that they can use what is supposed to be the mechanism for accountability. They can use it if they dominate it, if they control it, then they can protect themselves from accountability. Now if you dismantle the United Nations, if you disband the United Nations, if you dissolve the United Nations, you haven't solved that problem at all. You've only acquiesced to America's desire for complete unaccountability and impunity. You've even gone a step further than them in actually dissolving the one institution that exists in the world that has the potential power and the mandate to actually hold America accountable.

You couldn't you couldn't do a larger favor, a bigger favor to The United States than by just dismantling the United Nations. It makes no sense whatsoever. Unless, of course, you believe in American hegemony and you want it to exist forever.

Brother Ariane, you've heard, brother Shahid talk about that, America needs the United Nations and that the United Nations is important. But isn't America the the the number one contributor, financial contributor to the organization? Can you take us through that?

Well, it, currently funds, I think, about 22% of the UN body, but, we can consider that to be a significant portion of the UN budget. But this entire argument that expelling The US would somehow collapse the UN overlooks quite a lot of important considerations. The first consideration would be that other member states could simply increase their contributions, creating more balanced and equitable funding model for the UN. And without The US influence, the UN might operate more ethically and effectively, especially in consideration with the funds they have. Without The US influence, again, especially the particularly especially the global south, it could now come up and fill this gap, the financial gap, and then reduce the corruption linked to US funding.

Long term stability and credibility would therefore end up benefits would be a benefit as well.

Can I just say something about that with regards to the You know you know, in The United States, there's always a lot of talk, and there should be talk? However, it it it never, elevates to anything beyond talk. They talk about getting, all of the money out of politics. You talk about getting all of the lobbying money out of politics, the, super PACs, the PACs, the political action committees, so on. Getting corporate money out of politics, because everyone knows that that's a corrupting factor in American politics and politics everywhere.

So apply this logic. Understand that this logic applies when you're talking about the United Nations and America's funding of the United Nations. It's exactly the same logic because American money, has been the most corrupting influence at the United Nations. It has been the most corrupting influence, and it's the thing that has given them the most influence. It's give it's it's exactly what has given them the ability to dominate the United Nations.

So it's not a threat whatsoever, to the organization, if you're going to remove that money because that money is nothing but dirty money. It's bribe money. It's hush money. If you if you it's extortion money. So if you remove that money or you or you say that you're going to remove that money, that's nothing that's that's not a threat.

That's something that would make, anyone optimistic. That's just like saying we're gonna get all of the dirty money out of politics. We're gonna get all the dirty money out of campaigns, political campaigns. We're gonna get all of the dirty lobbying money out of out of Congress, out of the Senate, out of what have you. That's all that that's that's what that amounts to.

We're talking about getting dirty money out of the United Nations that has only ever been used to corrupt and extort the United Nations. And I'll and I'll bring up another point, which is that The United States has used the United Nations as an instrument for sowing conflict and warfare all across the globe, all around the world. If you look at where there are now UN peacekeeping forces, so called peacekeeping forces, Every single one of those conflict zones, if you just go down the list of where UN peacekeepers are right now, every single one of those conflict zones are conflicts that were instigated, or else perpetuated by The United States for the, purpose of benefiting them in their pocketbooks, in their bank accounts, in the bank accounts of the in defense sector, the arms industry, and so on, the military industrial complex. Every single one of those conflicts where they have, UN peacekeepers, they're over there, because America started those conflicts and is perpetuating those conflicts, and their actual job, because because America dominates the United Nations, their actual job over there is not to keep peace, but to keep peace from emerging. That's what their job is, to actually continue fueling those conflicts.

And anyone who lives in those conflict zones will tell you the same thing. Anyone who has actually had any experience with UN peacekeepers will tell you the same thing, that they're actually a bunch of criminals. And there's there's there's, endless allegations and accusations and actual criminal cases and convictions of so called peacekeepers, who have been, involved in sex trafficking, in human trafficking, in theft, in murder, in rape, and so on and so on and so on. They have used the UN peacekeepers, as part of a criminal organization. It's like a a a global organized crime syndicate under the auspices of the United Nations, under the dawn of The United States.

And that's all made possible by their money, by the way that they have the the disproportionate funding that they have been responsible for over the decades. Because the amount of money that they are contributing to the United Nations now is the lowest that it's ever been. If you remember, The United Nations was started right after World War two when all of the other economies in the world were devastated. All of the other economies in the world were, obliterated by World War two, whereas World War two was an economic boom for The United States. So they started, the United Nations as an organization, and they established the funding structure in such a way that they would have disproportionate power financially over the United Nations, and they did that, in the beginning, they had unparalleled, that no one was even close to the size of The US economy back in 1945, 1940, '7, 1948, and throughout the nineteen fifties was the the the the the biggest growth period for The United States economy and and not for anybody else.

So they were they were from the beginning and the inception of the United Nations and throughout the development of the United Nations, America's had disproportionate financial control over that organization. Now, as I said, they have the they they are providing the the smallest percentage of the UN budget than they than they ever have throughout history. Now I think China is is a very close second to them, and I think that just within a couple of years, China will outpace them and and will surpass them in terms of what they are spending to, fund the United Nations. So they've used this money to control the United Nations, and they use it, by extortion. They use it by, deciding who is gonna be placed in what position at the United Nations, how funding is gonna be distributed, to who, by who, what sort of aid, and so on, and who's gonna be in charge of this department of the United Nations, this organ of the United Nations, who's gonna be the secretary general, and so forth.

And they've always, used the policy of if you don't do it the way we want you to do it, then we won't give you the funding. They've always used their money, as a leverage, of control over the United Nations. So, there's no danger to the United Nations if they lose that money. And and, I was bringing up the conflict zones because that's where a lot of the money goes. That's where a lot of the UN budget goes, the peacekeeping, missions and related activities such as refugees and food programs and so forth.

Well, if The United States wasn't dominating the United Nations and wasn't able to use the the United Nations as an instrument for sowing conflicts all around the world, I think that you would see that the United Nations ended up having more money in their budget without that 22% from The United States than they have with that 22% because there would be a drastic reduction in conflicts around the world. There would be a drastic reduction, in human catastrophes caused by The United States, such as refugees, such as hunger, such as starvation and famine and so on. All of that would be drastically reduced because America's, capability to inflict those types of conflicts on the world would be drastically reduced. So I think that that no one would miss that 22% that The United States has been using all these years to bribe and blackmail the United Nations. I don't think anyone needs to be afraid of losing that dirty money, when that getting that money out of the United Nations is part of what will liberate the United Nations from American domination and control.

Can you tell us, how does American use of the United Nations impact global perception of justice and morality?

I think that we can't underestimate. And I I don't think that we can even accurately estimate the extent to which America's domination of the United Nations has had a corrupting influence on all of our perceptions of justice and our perceptions of government, our perception of law, our perception of even the possibility of power being used in a moral way. It has made everyone cynical. It's made everyone pessimistic. It's made everyone hopeless.

It's made everyone feel helpless. Because how else are you going to feel, when you see a drastic, and seemingly endless number of crimes being committed by The United States with no consequences. How else can you feel? You can see even by some of the questions that we get and some of the the frequently asked questions that we are attempting to answer here such as, well, you can't really practically remove The United States from the UN because of the money. Think about what you're saying.

If this is a rule, This is a rule of the United Nations. If you violate the principles of the charter, persistently, you should be removed. Because if you don't follow the rules, obviously, you should be removed. But everyone is taking it as, some kind of an acceptable position that as long as you've got money, the rules don't apply to you. Well, where did you learn that from?

If you're powerful enough, the rules don't apply to you. Where did you learn that from? If you're if you're, powerful enough, if you're strong enough, then you're above the law. Where'd you learn that from? You learned it from seven decades of American domination of the United Nations, which has enabled them to commit crimes from the North Pole to the South Pole, from the West, hemisphere to the East Hemisphere on every corner of the globe.

Horrific violations, horrific war crimes, horrific crimes against humanity, that they have been able to commit with impunity, And the, the institution that exists, as I've said, the one institution that exists that's supposed to hold nations accountable when they commit those types of crimes, has looked the other way because America controls it. So this has taught everyone. This has this has, taught all of us a very bad lesson, about the even possibility of international institutions operating according to morals and ethics and values and principles. So now we've all become cynical, about anything that we read that talks about justice, and anyone who talks about justice. When we talk about yeah.

Well, it's in the charter. There's a huge number of people who will say, yeah. But so what? It's America. It can never happen.

This defeatist mentality, this pessimistic cynical, mentality, as if the rules simply do not matter. You've all accepted, that might makes right because America has has beaten that lesson into your head. So I don't think it's possible for for us to even accurately estimate the extent of the psychological damage that that America's domination of the United Nations has caused to everyone on this planet. In so far as it has used that position of power. It has abused that position of power, in order for it to commit crimes, to commit atrocities, to commit, catastrophes and disasters across humanity with impunity, with no accountability whatsoever, and we've all just been normalized to that as if it's supposed to be okay.

We've all been normalized just like the American citizens themselves have had this horrific situation that you have domestically in your country. It's been normalized for you. Something like forty three thousand, people are murdered in that country just last year by gun violence alone. We're not even talking about other types of violence. Forty three thousand people, that's an an absolutely insane number.

And and the the the number of people who are killed on a daily basis, the number of people who were murdered, in targeted extrajudicial killings by the security forces in The United States, targeted killings. These are targeted, operations, by the security forces against so called minority groups in The United States. And when we talk about so called minority groups, why do I say so called? Because you're not a minority in any way whatsoever. You're part of the global majority that just happens to live in The United States, and only the fact that you consider yourself to be an American citizen above anything else, that's what makes you think of yourself as a minority when you're actually a part of the global majority.

So the security forces are are actively, systemically, and systematically targeting communities that are part of the global majority in The United States. It's it's it's exactly a part of the same colonizing imperialistic system that they use overseas. They're doing the exact same thing at home that they do overseas and targeting the same types of people. The same, as I said, you're part of the global majority. That means, black, brown, Asian, what have you, non white, non Christian, and so on.

You are targeted in your home countries, the countries of your origin or your parents' origin or your ancestors' origin, and you're targeted in your own country, and they look at you the same way. They look at you the same way if you were in Nigeria as they look at you when you're in New York. They look at you the same way when you're in Somalia as when they see you in Minnesota. They see you the exact same way. They see you the same way when you're in Gaza as they see you when you're in Chicago.

They look at you the same with the same imperialistic white supremacist mentality, and they treat you the same way, and they they employ their security forces at home the same way that they employ their security forces abroad. You're you're living in a a dystopian, horrific nightmare in that country, but you don't know it because it's all been normalized to you because you're punch drunk, and you're drunk on, propaganda and indoctrination. And so the the extent to which, this has, this this normalization of American violence, this normalization of might makes right, this normalization of the cynical pessimistic view of morality and values and principles and and virtue that that that those are all just things that we say in order to cover up our crimes because this has all been normalized. So this is also being normalized around the world, and it was already normalized. That's the only way that that society over there can even function in The United States, is if everyone just agrees to believe in this daydream, that they are actually living in some kind of a wonderful free democratic society when everybody's lived experience is the opposite.

They've normalized this to such an extent. The the the the degree to which this is unhealthy, the the the degree to which this dysfunction has been imposed upon humanity. This cognitive dissonance has been imposed upon humanity, and it's all been done by means of American domination of the United Nations. By means of the of The United States being able to undermine and sabotage the United Nations and circumvent the charter and never be held accountable for their actions, this has all taught us a very toxic lesson, that I think it's gonna probably take generations, for us to, mature beyond, for us to actually believe in the possibility of virtue, the possibility of powerful institutions operating according to principle. No one seems to believe that that's even possible.

I mean, even you hear it when people talk about, well, if you get rid of The United States from the UN, who is gonna be the next hegemon to dominate? Like there's no other way for things to function in the world except that there's one bully who has to control everything. This is a lesson that America taught you. It doesn't have to be like that. People can, countries can, governments can just operate in harmony with mutual benefit.

That's a thing that can happen. But America taught you otherwise, to to where your own view of reality is so warped and so bent and so twisted that you can't even conceive of the possibility that that that countries can just deal with each other in a peaceful non predatory manner. So I don't think it's even possible for us to estimate the extent to which America's domination of the United Nations has been detrimental to the understanding of all of us, to of all mankind with regards to issues like justice and morality when it comes to, the functioning of institutions and the functioning of governments. And I think that it's a it's an incredibly important step to actually say no. It doesn't matter how much money you have.

It doesn't matter how much money you pour into the United Nations. It doesn't matter how big your army is. It doesn't matter how much, power your corporations have. The rules are the rules, and they apply to everyone, for for for every country, large or small. And, if you have persistently and consistently and insistently violated the, principles of the United Nations Charter, the way that America has, then yes, you will be expelled.

I think that's going to be an epiphany moment for all of mankind and it will start a healing process that may take generations, but it that that healing process can never happen until, The United States is expelled from the United Nations, in my opinion.

Can I add to what brother Shahid said? Please. Please go ahead.

Please. Yeah. So, talking about what you said and the psychology of it all, I mean, the psychological aspect of it, the psychological hold that The United States has on its own population is what allows it to have the hold on its population. If people were to believe that The US is not invincible, then they would be more willing to stop it from being so invincible, stop it from having this exceptionalism and hegemony. They would be more willing to work together to be able to remove The US from the UN and stop its, exceptionalism, like I said, and stop its authority to be able to authorize its own war crimes.

So, by making people believe that it's too strong to defeat, people are Even even when The US is not too strong to, defeat, people are just gonna sit there and accept, yeah, no, they're not they're so strong, but that perception is not a real perception, it's what they fed to you. And it's something that we always talk about, how The US quite literally repackages the truth. I mean, the only way The US can manipulate words like freedom and rights is by doing the same with their opposites, with words like oppression and terrorism. So they do this to make their population believe that what The US has been doing for centuries is objectively morally correct. So essentially, they twist the truth in their favor, switching the definitions of good and evil, making their actions, those for freedom and the actions of any opposition, that of a terroristic nature.

So when people say, I am free in The United States, I am safe in The United States, especially when it comes from people of color, they are using the words that the government uses when in actuality the meaning of those words has been switched with the meaning of its antonym. So this is literally done with the intention of misleading their civilians and civilians of the world into believing that anybody who fights back against The United States and their hegemony is a group of terrorists who oppresses their own people, and we've seen this a multitude of times. Therefore, the definitions of freedom and rights are also changed, meaning that when The US goes on their endeavors to commit war crimes globally and domestically, they are seen as doing it out of the goodness of their hearts, delivering freedom to people worldwide rather than oppressing people worldwide and taking advantage of people worldwide. So this so called freedom comes in the form of genocides and ethnic cleansings, comes in the form of this war zone that we're seeing in The United States Of America that is not labeled as a war zone, it's labeled as the country of freedom, the land of the free.

The the reality is that The US has been the biggest oppressor of international populations and their own population by stealing resources and killing millions of people and forcing their own corrupted ideas of liberation upon the people in the entire world. And in the Quran, in Surat Al Baqarah, it says, in chapter two verse 11, it says, which directly translates to do not spread corruption. When they are told do not spread corruption in the world, they reply, we are only peacemakers. Indeed, it is they who are the corrupters, but they fail to perceive it. So, it's just like Isaac Herzog, who is the president of so called Israel and The US's biggest ally, said that the last thing that Israel is seeking in this region since its creation is to go to war.

We are seeking peace, We are peace seekers. That is the quotation that he used, which directly reflects what is said in the Quran, which shows you that history always repeats itself. And these people who believe that they can play God always fall, we have seen this time and time again. So with The US exercising this tyranny around the world for decades, since the very inception of the United Nations, and well, actually centuries, their hegemony has no place in this world. But it's never been questioned to the extent that it's questioned today.

It's all because of their brainwashing and promotion of uncritical irrational thinking. And just in the last ten months, eleven months of jesus ibn Gaza perpetrated by Israel and The United States, so these two subjugators, the world has turned their backs on them and we've seen this. So their psychological manipulation is a very big aspect in what gives them power. Because now that the people are breaking free from this psychological torture, the world is essentially turning its back on The United States Of America and essentially that causes them to turn their back against Israel. Seeing it it was Israel's fault that the entire expose of Zionism, the expose of the Western Hegemonian exceptionalism began.

Well, it began just before that. I mean, for the last three years, people have been turning their backs to the West. But just over the last eleven months, more damage has been done to the West than ever before. So before you think, well, I'm not going to sign this petition because it's not going to do anything, think about why this thought has crossed your mind. Why you want to say this.

Because ultimately, you are going to find that it's The United States Of America and the West as a whole, the g seven, that have battered these ideas into your brain. And you should start thinking for yourself. Start exploring ideas you've never explored before and you will find that you can break free from this psychological chain that you have, this mental cage that you have. You don't have to be stuck in this cage forever, which means that when you want to get out of it, you have to try to get The US out of the UN as well, because that's the only way they're gonna be able to lose their grip on everyone's minds, to lose their grip of the entire world.

Why is America's position, their stance on Palestine, a violation of the UN Charter? That's the question?

That's correct. Yes.

Well, the occupation is illegal by international law. The occupation of Gaza, the occupation of the West Bank is illegal. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. The use of white phosphorus, for example, and other weapons by Israel is illegal. The barrier wall is illegal.

It's illegal for for Israel to occupy Gaza and the West Bank, and it's similarly illegal for them to even try to prevent resistance against that occupation. Because the resistance is legal, and it's illegal for an occupying force to try to even prevent the occupied people from resisting them. That's actually in international law. That's in the Geneva Conventions. So Israel is in violation of international law at every level.

And American support for a a violator of international law at every level. I mean, was in the in fact, it was in the agreement from the beginning at the time inception of the United Nations that recognized Israel as a state, that was conditional upon the recognition and the establishment of a Palestinian state. So this has been in a state of illegality for the entire history of its existence, Israel. And therefore, any sort of support for that, is in and of itself a violation of the United Nations. It's a violation of international law, supplying weapons, supplying funding, arming, supporting politically and diplomatically, a a state that is accused of and is guilty of gross human rights violations, war crimes, and obviously crimes against humanity and genocide.

This is illegal. It's illegal in international law, and by the way, it's even illegal according to American law. So their support, for Israel is absolutely a violation, of the, United Nations Charter, and in fact, if you wanted to make a case for the persistent violations by The United States of the principles of the UN Charter, you wouldn't actually even have to look at any other actions that they have committed other than what they have done in support of Israel because it has all been illegal. It has all been in violation of international law, it has all it it all constitutes, persistent violations of the principles of the UN Charter. If you don't look anywhere else, if you don't look at any other American crimes around the world, if you don't even look at the, crimes that America commits against its own citizens, it's actually sufficient just to look at the history, of America's relationship with Israel, for you to have a dossier, that recounts and records, presents a full record that any objective person would regard as proof of persistent violations of the principles of the UN Charter.

Why is The United sorry, United States Of America's influence and the veto power? Why is it an issue? I mean, all other members or the the the permanent permanent members have veto powers. Why is America's use any different?

The way that the United Nation the way the way that The United States has typically used their veto power. They have used their veto power to overrule the global consensus. When, Russia or China, for example, have ever used their veto power, it is to overrule The United States in favor of the global consensus. This is the difference. America has used the veto power to overrule the rest of the planet.

And Russia and China have used their veto power to overrule America, on the side of the rest of the planet. So there's a significant difference in their intention, and the reasons why those vetoes have ever been invoked. And America has only ever done it for their own interests against the interests of the global consensus, against the interests of the rest of the people of the world.

With that said, how will the implication of article six really affect the average Americans?

Who are you asking?

You, but I'm a shade.

Ah, okay. Well, as I've said, I think that the average American citizen is deeply in a stupor about the reality that they're living in, to where they don't understand even what their rights are under international law. And if The United States was expelled from the United Nations, they might have recourse to the United Nations, they might have recourse to international law, and some of these, as I say, dystopian catastrophic problems that you have in The United States might be dealt with. America might be held responsible, and held accountable for their actions that they commit against you, yourselves, the American people. On a more macro level, I'll say, that because of the fact that the American economy has been driven, for decades since World War two, since the throughout the entire lifespan of the United Nations, the American economy has been driven by the military industrial complex.

And the United Nations and domination and control of the United Nations has been a central part of how that engine has run because they've been able to use as I said before, they've been able to use the United Nations as an instrument to enable America to sow conflicts all around the world, which are profitable for their weapons sector, which are profitable for the Pentagon and the military industrial complex. So if that device is removed from their hand, and they're no longer able, to sow conflict all around the world for, profit reasons, then that will be, that will cause problems for the American economy. The American economy will suffer to one degree or another. So there will be consequences for the average, American citizen, related to that, a potential economic contraction. But I would go further and say that the American people will most likely you will most likely see because this is the logical process.

If America is gonna get expelled for persistent violations, then the next logical step is that America then will be held accountable for those violations. Meaning, they will have punitive rehabilitative measures imposed against The United States by the United Nations in order to get them to stop committing those violations. Like, for example, the violations that they commit against the American people themselves. That could most likely would take the form of economic sanctions that would be imposed by the United Nations. Now America operates in a trade deficit every year.

It means that they import, more than they export. Means they're buying more than they're selling, internationally. Roughly a trillion dollars a year. They import roughly a trillion dollars a year more in goods and services than they export. So that's a trillion dollars that would almost instantly be removed from the American economy if they were to have sanctions imposed upon them by their major trading partners and by the other 190 something countries in the world.

That would be devastating to the American economy. The dollar would plummet, The stock market would plummet. The economy would contract. Inflation would skyrocket. That's a reality.

But the good news about that is that it would also be, and it probably is one of the only, if not the only, practical steps that can be taken to actually free the American people from corporate domination, from corporate control. Because if America were to suffer economic sanctions, they can't survive. Those corporations can't survive, and they will I'm not saying that they that the corporations themselves won't survive, but they won't survive inside America. And they will lose their interest in trying to dominate America, and not to mention lose their ability to do so because they their profits are gonna dry up. So many of those companies, if they decide to stay in America, their profits will dry up, and they won't be able to buy off congress anymore.

They won't be able to fund millions and millions, if not billions of dollars into political campaigns to control your government. This is actually it may be a somewhat painful, it may be a somewhat difficult sacrifice to make, a struggle to go through. But I think that it's a necessary struggle that the American people would need to go through and a necessary sacrifice that they'll have to make to actually free themselves from corporate domination. Because if you don't know, corporations are controlling every single aspect of your life from start to finish, from the time you wake up in the morning to the time you go to to bed at night. Even they determine what time you get up in the morning and what time you go to bed at night.

They even decide how much sleep you get, how much sleep you're allowed to get. They control everything in your life. And getting The United States out of the United Nations and allowing the United Nations to have the freedom to actually impose consequences on The United States would actually, in the long term, be, I think, the most practical mechanism, that I can think of, that would actually, free the American people from, that type of corporate domination. So I think ultimately it's a very good thing, but that's just talking about economically and quality of life. But I have very bad news for my American listeners and viewers, which is that the future looks grim either way.

The future of the American economy looks grim either way because, as I've talked about before, one of the reasons is just the pure demographics. Just demographics. It's like if you have a if you have a shop in a in a neighborhood where there's not that many people and you don't have that many customers and you don't have that many, people to even, as a labor pool to hire from, well, eventually, you're gonna have to close your shop and move it somewhere else. And that's the case with the West. That's the case with America, and that's the case with Europe.

There's just not enough people to serve the the profit demands of the private sector as compared to the global South. Now if the global South didn't exist, it would be a different story, but the global South exists and they have a robust demographics. They have robust demographics numbers as compared to the West, as compared to The United States. So there are large segments of the private sector that are already in the process of upping stakes and moving to the global South in terms of their focus. So I think that The United States already anyway has a bit of a grim economic future.

But, the as I was talking about earlier, the other positive thing about it is that you might, finally be able to get some of your rights under international law defended and protected. Because, as it is now, the way they've set up the the way they've set up that system over there, with the the brainwashing, particularly with the brainwashing to where you think, that, that the only person that you can go to to complain about your rights being violated is to the one who's violating your rights. They've they that's the way they've set up the system over there, and you, are so brainwashed and to think that it's normal and it makes sense somehow. But, actually, what you're supposed to be able to do when your human rights are being violated is to take that to an international body that is responsible for the enforcement of the protection of human rights and the enforcement of human human rights law, international law. That's what you're supposed to be able to do.

Now, even if you know about it, even if you know what your rights are under international law, there's nothing you can do about it. Because if you even try, to bring, your issue to the United Nations, America will shoot it down. So, once America gets expelled from the United Nations, then the United Nations, will be able to actually address, and give redress, to the grievances of the American people if and when they ever learn what their rights are under international law. And understand that, for example, when their communities are being targeted, so called minority communities, members of the global majority are being targeted by extrajudicial killings by the security forces, you'll understand that that's not something that you're supposed to now take that one single police officer to court and have him tried by a a jury of his peers in Kansas or in Minnesota or in Missouri or in California or what have you. No.

He's part of a system that is guilty of what amounts to a form of ethnic cleansing, and he needs to be taken. And the police commissioner needs to be taken, and the police chief needs to be taken, and all of the officers involved, and probably people on the city council and the mayor, need to be taken actually to The Hague. They need to be taken to the ICC, for crimes against humanity. Because this isn't a joke. But you think that this is that you that this may sound very dramatic and hyperbolic to American ears, but that's because you've been so normalized to your own oppression that you don't recognize it when it's happening to you.

So for the average American citizen, I think that there may be, some economic hardship, but that's something that's gonna be happening to you either way. But on the more positive note, I think that ultimately expelling The United States from the United Nations is a step that will help to liberate you from corporate domination, and it is a step that will help to liberate you from the oppression of your own government against you because they will be held accountable for their actions, whether they're committed overseas or in The United

States. Sometimes these things take more time than we'd like, and that's the that's the grown up truth about it. Because we have to get all we have to get the money right. We have to get the resources right. We have to get everything right to have less casualties around the world.

Because at the endgame, it's not, you know, just Benjamin Netanyahu wanting, you know, this little age group. He wants everything. And if we play to his rules, we will lose. And that long game is long suffering, which is unfortunate, but we have to stay the course. And we and staying the course as somebody in the diaspora, you know, I can't have a direct influence over bricks, but I can educate people about bricks.

I don't have a direct influence about international policy, but I can tell people to go sign this petition. And I can tell them the most important thing, especially for Americans, because on average, we read in the fourth grade level. We don't like to read books. We don't like to educate ourselves, but I'm seeing that shift happen now because it's more concerning. So do you my question is, do you believe that it is in the right strategic move to get control over all of the resources that make the weapons because they're gonna run out, get control of the money which you already agree, and that the other countries aren't moving fast because they have a long game?

I think definitely. The the the other countries aren't, aren't moving fast because they're playing the long game. And I think that they're also aiming at a more important objective. As you said, we, just the average person, we see what's happening in Gaza, and we want, instant moral gratification. We wanna see instant, we want it to to to stop instantly, and we wanna see the perpetrators punished instantly.

And this, even as you can say, is part of a colonized mentality of of the West because they're very superficial and they and they and they they operate in a in a very sort of instant gratification materialistic manner that they can't think very far ahead. But, you know, I I I I compare it to you know, there's a there's an old story you may have heard. There's a there's the the story goes that there's a river, and there's a man walking past the river, and he sees a baby floating down the river who's gonna drown. And then he sees another one, and then he sees another one, and another one, and another one. So he goes into the river and starts trying to save the babies.

While he's doing that, another man comes along by the river and sees what's happening, and then he starts to walk away. And the man who's in the river starts shouting at him, where are you going? We have to save these babies. And he said, that's what I'm doing. I'm going to where they're coming from.

I'm going to where those babies are being put in the river in the first place so that we can solve the the actual core problem. And that's what the the Arab states are doing because they have identified just as we have with our petition. Because some people might say, well, what does this petition have to do with Gaza? Because we have identified that the genocide is a genocide by veto. The genocide is an American genocide.

The genocide has been enabled by American control of The United Nations because there would have already been a cease fire, and in fact, the entire Israeli Palestinian conflict would have been resolved before I was even born if America didn't dominate the United Nations. This problem even wouldn't even be happening now, and it would have been happening my entire life, and even potentially even my mother's life. It would have already been resolved if America didn't, control and dominate the United Nations. So the Gulf States and the Arab States have identified that their problem isn't Israel, their problem is American hegemony. So they're making all of the moves that they need to make to free themselves from American hegemony and to isolate The United States as much as possible from their region and from the rest of the planet, And I think we should all thank them for that.